But the quote from the second meeting does not say there wasn't DNA material, it says there was no match.
I guess I should catch up and figure out what we are really talking about here. Sorry if this is a distraction.
Well, you can find both sorts of quotes. It's a bit odd.
Not a problemo...
I know that's what he said and I've seen him say it twice myself.. But when I looked at the news conference on the 12th after the 2nd DNA test, the way he said it then left the impression that there really wasn't any other DNA. He said it like "there was no other genetic material that would (or could... my term) match anyone anywhere"...
Now if he said it that way and it seemed very extemporaneous, but he really meant something else, then he is really good.
I have read a couple articles previously and today that insinuated that there was evidence of at least three donors, of which only one was matched. But I can't get that from the defense guy's statements.
Let me add this... If there is other genetic material on the 2nd DNA report retrieved from the AV that does not match any of the Duke players or her BF and neither of the 2 drivers she named, then she is again proved to have deceived the DA. If that is the case, I cannot understand why the defense wouldn't be making that known, instead of trying to pretend it's not there.