Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: darbymcgill

Video of the first DNA defense press conterence:

http://www.wral.com/news/8600601/detail.html


425 posted on 05/26/2006 7:39:39 AM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies ]


To: GAgal

Yep, it's like I remembered. Cheshire is very specific about there being no DNA on or in her that would indicate that CGM had sex. Thus the boyfriend's DNA was not found by the SBI.


426 posted on 05/26/2006 7:53:50 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies ]

To: GAgal
Video of the first DNA defense press conterence:

Thanks for the link.. I guess my recall is not as good as I thought..

In the first DNA press conference he says basically "there was nothing found in the vaginal swab to indicate she had any sex with anyone"

In the press conference for the 2nd DNA result when asked if there was DNA from others besides the BF, he states "on the vaginal, rectal and oral swabs there was no other genetic material that was matched to anyone, anywhere"

So, IMO the lawyers either misspoke in the first press conference or the report was incomplete... There would be no other reason to seek a second test.

476 posted on 05/26/2006 12:06:43 PM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson