Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: darbymcgill
If she had recent sex with three men, then there should be three separate DNA's. If two were protected, which they obviously were, then she knew all along which one it was.

So why did she even admit to 3 possibilities. Something isn't quite right.

105 posted on 05/25/2006 10:11:04 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau; ladyjane
So why did she even admit to 3 possibilities. Something isn't quite right.

Please note several of l.j. posts.. She's been trying to make the point for a long time that just because they only found one match doesn't mean that there wasn't other DNA found that they couldn't match...

I agreed with her some time back that they didn't say there wasn't any other DNA found in her. They have only said there was a match found to a single male source

Many, self included initially ran with that as they only found evidence of DNA in the vaginal swab to one DNA and one SOURCE... They really haven't said that... exactly...

108 posted on 05/25/2006 10:17:24 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

Not necessarily. There are several reasons why the other two guys' semen wasn't picked up.


208 posted on 05/25/2006 3:09:15 PM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson