Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duke rape accuser's records demanded
MSNBC ^ | Updated: 4:51 p.m. ET April 24, 2006 | staff

Posted on 04/24/2006 2:16:50 PM PDT by Perdogg

DURHAM, N.C. - The attorney for one of two Duke lacrosse players charged with raping a stripper demanded on Monday that prosecutors turn over the accuser’s medical, legal and education records for use in attacking her credibility.

Kirk Osborn, who represents player Reade Seligmann, said the material will provide “rich sources of information for impeaching the complaining witnesses.”

Osborn also asked a judge to hold a pretrial hearing to “determine if the complaining witness is even credible enough to provide reliable testimony.”

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Local News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; durham
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-292 next last
To: Howlin

I just got back here but had it on while cleaning up from dinner.

Essence magazine reporter has talked with accuser's family and they say the stripper is thinking about pulling out of the case because of stress on her family. (Yeah - right)

Defense lawyer asking for stripper's medical records going back to high school and something mentioned in the brief that she has had mental health, drug and truthfulness problems dating back to high school.


21 posted on 04/24/2006 3:17:33 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SouthernFreebird

LOL


22 posted on 04/24/2006 3:48:17 PM PDT by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Additionally, J. Kirk Osborn, who represents 20-year-old Reade Seligmann, surmises that there is a "good chance" that the accuser "may have been committed, at least once, to a hospital or drug treatment program." As such, Osborn wants material documenting the woman's supposed "drug abuse history," according to a discovery motion filed this afternoon in Durham's Superior Court. The motion, a copy of which you'll find below, also seeks the 27-year-old dancer's criminal history, probation, and education records. The material sought, Osborn argues, provides "rich sources of information for impeaching the complaining witness."

Here is this case in a nutshell:

1. Some college boys drinking one night call an escort service for some strippers to perform.

2. Two strippers show up, and one of them is drunk out of her mind, and the other one is full of anger and attitude. They perform for 4 minutes.

3. The college boys are ticked off, and demand their money back.

4. Racial slurs are thrown on both sides, a heated argument ensues.

5. The strippers leave, and the semi-sober stripper attempts to dump the passed out stripper at a Kroeger supermarket parking lot. Meanwhile, the second stripper makes a phoney 911 call saying she and her "girlfriend" were just walking buy a house and were called "_iggers."

6. The drunk stripper wakes up and yells rape, while the second stripper (who may or may have not taken her share of the $800 while she was passed out) e-mails a PR firm and asks for help on how she can profit from this.


23 posted on 04/24/2006 3:54:08 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
You seem to know a lot ~ question, if the fellow(s) who hired the escort company to send strippers paid the escort company, did the escort service pay the strippers before they stripped?

Does anyone really want any of us to believe that in this racket the actors get paid first?

24 posted on 04/24/2006 5:08:23 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane; All

too late ;)
You all are doing such a great job on this case.Just wanted to say "thanks"


25 posted on 04/24/2006 5:42:13 PM PDT by ozaukeemom (Nuke the ACLU and their snivel rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I think you pretty much nailed it except you forgot about the race-baiting DA who sees this as his ticket to reelection.


26 posted on 04/24/2006 5:46:02 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
CHILDREN PROTECTIVE SERVICE. In the beginning, due to her problems with CPS, we thought she devised this story to cover her arse from CPS. Is she on probation with CPS, due to her drinking and drugging problems?
27 posted on 04/24/2006 5:50:09 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc. 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Wasn't that a hit at Nifong when Osborn wrote that he would be presenting an alibi defense with witnesses "who should be known to the DA"... kinda like "A competent DA would have known of these exculpatory evidence/witnesses and would not have charged my client."


28 posted on 04/24/2006 6:52:14 PM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane

ping


29 posted on 04/24/2006 6:54:19 PM PDT by maggief (And the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: All

Does anyone else find it interesting that they are asking for documents from Victims' Advocacy Agencies or Organizations? IMO that is where the real smoking gun will be found.


30 posted on 04/24/2006 6:59:29 PM PDT by vikingvx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I think the Defense Team needs to call in Charlie Sheen as an expert witness on the definitions of 'escort service'....'stripper'...and.....'exotic dancer' ....LOL!


31 posted on 04/24/2006 7:02:41 PM PDT by BossLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I thought that was a typo and they mean to say "CRS",,,


32 posted on 04/24/2006 7:04:19 PM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Good evening, and thanks for the ping.


33 posted on 04/24/2006 7:11:27 PM PDT by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks. I read that, but I was looking for something that said that Crystal had made false accusations in the past. No question that there's a mountain of stuff to impeach her credibility. Ya think?

What happened to our thread? Flame war? (Whenever I leave the puter, something happens!)


34 posted on 04/24/2006 7:11:54 PM PDT by Mad-Margaret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

On one of the shows it was mentioned that it does not take this long for the DNA results to be completed, that the DA wants them after the election.


35 posted on 04/24/2006 7:12:51 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

Are we all over here now? Is this the thread?


36 posted on 04/24/2006 7:14:33 PM PDT by Mad-Margaret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mad-Margaret

I think those false accusations will be found in the documents that the defense is requesting from Victims' Advocacy Agencies or Organizations. IMHO.


37 posted on 04/24/2006 7:15:29 PM PDT by vikingvx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mad-Margaret

I don't know....I was gone for a few minutes and poof!


38 posted on 04/24/2006 7:18:24 PM PDT by Jrabbit (Scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: vikingvx; Jrabbit

Thanks!

Tuned in late to Greta (11:16). Has this been All Aruba? Or did she give some time to Duke?


39 posted on 04/24/2006 7:20:30 PM PDT by Mad-Margaret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jrabbit

What the heck happened?


40 posted on 04/24/2006 7:23:16 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-292 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson