Skip to comments.
"Man Creates Engine That Consumes No Fuel;
The National Tattler ^
| 7/1/73
| Tom Valentine
Posted on 04/22/2006 2:09:18 AM PDT by BlueSky194
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-131 next last
To: maineman
I once did the software for one of those.
81
posted on
04/22/2006 5:21:02 AM PDT
by
Erasmus
(Eat beef. Someone has to control the cow population!)
To: Drango
...I got some beachfront property in Arizona that you might be interested in. Do you take Paypal?I'll have you know... we have beach front property in Arizona.
82
posted on
04/22/2006 5:21:36 AM PDT
by
quin
(when running naked in the desert, ya gotta watch out for the pricks)
To: RavenATB
Me too. But, I built my first house in 1989, for $52 a square foot, including the lot. I build my fourth home two years ago, for $135 a square foot, and that house is currently worth about twice what I paid for it...or, about $270 a square foot. BTTT
Now, do the same math with food, clothing, medical costs, insurance, taxes, wages, popcorn, telephones, water, etc. etc.
The whole thing is another silly "created" crisis to get the media and politicians through the long boring summer months.
To: Pusterfuss
While we are at it, make the highways out of rubber so neither they nor your tires would wear out.:) Now there's a use for all those discarded old tires!Arizona uses old tires to rubberize it's metro freeways... it's fracken awesome.
84
posted on
04/22/2006 5:25:32 AM PDT
by
quin
(when running naked in the desert, ya gotta watch out for the pricks)
To: peyton randolph
"I thinkd Colonel Sanders was in on it.
Darn. Forgot him...and Elvis too."
And Bruce Lee. Don't forget Bruce Lee.
85
posted on
04/22/2006 5:30:39 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(To Serve Man......It's a cookbook!)
To: BlueSky194
There are suckers born every minute.
86
posted on
04/22/2006 5:30:42 AM PDT
by
BadAndy
(Islam is a religion of submission. YOUR submission.)
To: EQAndyBuzz
And Bruce Lee. Don't forget Bruce Lee.
That's right. He provides the security that prevents the evil oil companies from stealing the invention. ;-)
87
posted on
04/22/2006 5:35:44 AM PDT
by
peyton randolph
(Time for an electoral revolution where the ballot box is the guillotine)
To: Slump Tester
You forgot the Illuminati.He didn't forget.....everytime he typed it, it suspiciously disappeared off his screen..................
88
posted on
04/22/2006 5:46:11 AM PDT
by
Onelifetogive
(* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
To: uglybiker
I'm tempted to put my life savings into this invention but I'm holding off for now.
You see, my neighbor is working on special eyeglasses that enable the wearer to see through women's clothing. Apparently, it works by splitting polarized light into it's three major components which effectively makes material objects, such as clothing, transparent.
He tells me that has big money behind him, including a consortium headed by Bill Clinton, but I'm still hoping he'll let me invest.
89
posted on
04/22/2006 5:53:49 AM PDT
by
finnigan2
(OUS)
To: ketelone
Wow... and thats why its being reported in the "National Tattler"LOL! Yeah, but how does Bat Boy figure into all this?
90
posted on
04/22/2006 5:55:24 AM PDT
by
yankeedame
("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
To: uglybiker
91
posted on
04/22/2006 6:10:35 AM PDT
by
Mojave
To: Kozak
Anyone who did dropped 10 IQ points right there.... LOL!
92
posted on
04/22/2006 6:12:13 AM PDT
by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: BlueSky194
Stories about revolutionary dicoveries about auto engines or energy sources appear every six months or whenever there is a spike in oil prices.
Have you ever seen one of these products come to market? The Oil companies buy them off and kill the project?
Surely there is ONE inventor out there who will be true to his patent and make his own millions. Or maybe ONE automaker that can see a ripe plum in new technology?
Or maybe the tabloid press will find a new inventor in six months.
93
posted on
04/22/2006 6:15:15 AM PDT
by
wildbill
To: BlueSky194
94
posted on
04/22/2006 6:25:55 AM PDT
by
Kay Ludlow
(Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
To: BlueSky194
I want Discovery Channel's Mythbusters program to look at this engine and see if they can actually make it work.
To: BlueSky194
I got as far as "...former Volkswagen mechanic..."
To: coconutt2000
"There are positive particles in the wiring and all mass for that matter, and the configuration of the electron shell determines a material's conductivity, but electricity is the movement of electrons, which are purely negative." True. I caught that part as well. A number of capacitors in series, however, might be more efficient for generating power from a given potential than a steady stream of electrons using a standard brush-style motor. I can't recall enough electrical theory to work it out.
97
posted on
04/22/2006 6:56:11 AM PDT
by
CowboyJay
(Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
To: BlueSky194
98
posted on
04/22/2006 7:06:43 AM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: PeteB570
The wankle engine is a darn efficient design. It is NOT a perpetual motion machine. It is an engine.
Further, it is a production engine in Mazda cars. At one point there were aircraft engines as well.
The problem with the rotary engine is sealing. It is a highly effective use of motion and the moving parts are limited, but the area of sealed surfaces is very high.
99
posted on
04/22/2006 7:10:57 AM PDT
by
laxcoach
To: BlueSky194
LOL! Is this an April Fool's joke? Or just another of the Fools who have been "had" by con-men claiming perpetual motion machines since the Middle Ages.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-131 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson