Posted on 04/20/2006 6:54:31 AM PDT by mlc9852
With all due respect, I will have to disagree with you on that one. You fail to realize the subculture of these professions. There is drug addiction, "white slavery", physical threats to consider. Not making any excuse for a bald faced liar with a drug/alcohol problem, but it's an ugly world at the bottom of the food chain. Many do not choose to do these things. They're the ones who don't get noticed until they're dead.
Thanks !!
I was pretty sure that's what you meant, but the timeline keeps changing so I thought maybe something new happened while I was out. LOL
The first call at 12:53 Kim, pretending to be a passer-by, called 911 to report racial slurs.
The second call at 1:22 was made from Kroger's.
freepmail
see post #22.
You know I think that you are guilty of trying to put words into mouth's. that might disagree with you.
In any serious confrontation between black and white racial slurs will almost always be uttered. Only the white person will be held responsible.
That's what I remember. So we don't know where she made that first call from, although I'm remembering that in the very beginning there were posts that she says she drove around the block and was parked in front of the house when she made that first call.
And well all said if she was frightened, why would she drive around and then park in front of the house again.
see post #22. Ann Coulter writes quite a compelling article.
you may certainly think whatever you like, but i have kept up with the Duke threads since this story broke and i have seen those sentiments expressed. one does not need to defend these boys on moral grounds, or even to LIKE THEM personally or their "type", in order to be outraged by a false claim of rape.
Then you missed Susan Filan on Abrams yesterday, who suggested the boys may have put their coats on before they raped the stripper.
No kidding.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12405242/
This woman was in the Navy and is a college student. That hardly sounds like the bottom of the food chain.
Very well stated, xsmommy. Bravo!
The issue here is GUILT or INNOCENCE in a Rape and Kidnapping case
GUILT or INNOCENCE
Not Bad taste or vulgarity or what may offend some
The point has been made that they could've done things differently.
This is a miscarriage of justice and it's entirely different than offending someone senses. Hell, they shouldn't drink either .. What are our chances of getting 18-20 year olds to stop drinking by just telling them?
She admitted early on in interviews she did about 3 one-on-ones a week. That's not very high on the food chain.
And having two children from another man while still married isn't terribly impressive either. Neither is stealing a car and running over a policeman.
i read ann coulter's article and while her point may be valid it is quite separate and apart from the issue of a false claim of rape. while the "victims" (rich white privileged whoremongering college boys) may not be likeable or defensible on moral grounds, they do not remotely merit having their lives ruined by a false charge of rape, any more than a virtuous, straight arrow of a male, who could have the same false charge made against him, in completely different circumstances.
And, when it is proved that they were falsely accused, I will be just as outraged.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.