If anyone wants to see how credable GE is check this out
New poster on the board. Have to catch them up on what's been going on...
Golden Eagle is a pathological liar and hypocrite. Here are examples:
Here, he complains that Cedega's not free: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1591595/posts?page=115#115
and then, mocks another user for suggesting that Cedega be free: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1591595/posts?page=134#134
then complains that Linux is free: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1530486/posts?page=40#40
and here he is, recommending free Solaris: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1490554/posts?page=21#21
Here he is, criticizing Linux because it doesn't run Windows apps: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1591595/posts?q=1&&page=101#115
and copping out when challenged about Windows inability to run Linux apps: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1591595/posts?page=118#118
Here he is, recommending Solaris, which doesn't run Windows apps: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1490554/posts?page=21#21
...and Apple, which doesn't either: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1573697/posts?page=9#9
Here, he's criticizing others for namecalling: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1584107/posts?page=29#29
And here he is, namecalling: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1583531/posts?page=61#61
Here's where he refers to Dell "systems": http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1585665/posts?page=35#35
Then denies his own words: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1585665/posts?page=137#137
then blames me for it all, saying I should have reminded him of his own words: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1585665/posts?page=165#165
Then, here's where he makes more false accusations of ME: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?page=90#90
and here's where I ask him to prove I said the things he accused me of: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?page=92#92
And refuses to provide a link to MY posts (he just linked to my history instead): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?page=95#95
And fails again to prove what he says: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?page=99#99
And yet again, repeating the accusations, but failing to provide proof: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?page=122#122
And now, where his "proof" is something I didn't even post: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=125#125
and where he has the nerve to ask another poster to back up what they say with specific examples, despite the fact that he refused to do so for me: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=255#255
and here is where he demands that yet someone ELSE provide a link to prove what THEY said: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1568848/posts?page=68#68
and here is where he claims he will admit mistakes, despite the fact that he hasn't admitted this one: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592494/posts?page=43#43
Here he is claiming that Red Hat has a couple of hundred Linux kernel developers: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1527263/posts?page=49#49
And here he is claiming no one knows how many kernel developers work for Red Hat: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1527263/posts?page=77#77
and yet, he denies that he said hundreds, yet again (21st paragraph): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=131#131
And here he is getting nailed for it yet again:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=132#132
and again: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=137#137
and claiming that I never proved that he was wrong about the number of kernel developers at Red Hat: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=134#134
Here's where he hijacked the Open Source Ping List, and the ensuing discussion: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1571222/posts?page=8#8
Here he is ridiculing another poster for using bold fonts to make a point: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1493462/posts?page=130#130
And here he is using bold fonts to make a point: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=106#106
Here he is defending Microsoft's contributions to Planned Parenthood: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1492595/posts?page=22#22
And here he is defending Planned Parenthood itself: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1601565/posts?page=35#33
and again: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1601565/posts?page=40#40
Here is a Linux thread with only one post by GE (notice how pleasant and peaceful): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1500664/posts?q=1&&page=1
Here is a Linux thread where GE stayed and trolled (well beyond 280 posts, totally off the topic. No insults before he showed up, as with many of his threads. He has stated multiple times that he was leaving, yet he keeps posting, because he's a last word freak): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?q=1&&page=1#1
Here's where GE says Stallman is a whacko leftist: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1601565/posts?page=24#24
Here's where I agree: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1601565/posts?page=30#30
And here's where he disagrees that I agree: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1601565/posts?page=30#31
Here he is saying that he's leaving the thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=127#127
and here he is, many days and over 100 posts later, still posting: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?q=1&&page=281#284
he complains that Cedega's not free
How is that a lie?
complains that Linux is free
Because as I said in that post foreign governments get to make free copies and run their computers on it. How is that a lie?
recommending free Solaris
How does that make me a liar? Solaris doesn't use the Free Sofware Foundation license put out by that radical leftist Stallman. Plus it's bonafide American Unix, not a foriegn fake like Linux.
criticizing Linux because it doesn't run Windows apps
Go back and actually try to read, I was criticising it for not having much "commercial software", since most of its users want everything for free. Still not a lie.
Solaris...Apple...
Good ole American Unix, not related to that leftist whacko Stallman you parrot all the time.
he's criticizing others for namecalling
Rightfully so, its what most of you do as soon as I start debunking your BS. Now you're saying I lied repeatedly but you haven't shown one yet.
refuses to provide a link to MY posts (he just linked to my history instead)
Hysterical! How is that a lie? And of course, FLAMMING DEATH has been posting on all the linix lie threads too, just as his history shows.
where he refers to Dell "systems"
Follow my links, those companies made it almost impossible for those callers to buy a Linux system from them. Not impossible, almost impossible, which is why they were complaining. How is that a lie? Looks like you're the one that's actually been caught lying again, doesn't it.
here is where he claims he will admit mistakes
As I just did on this very thread. How is that a lie? You're still the only one lying, and still haven't admitted it, just attack me for pointing it out to everyone like usual.
claiming that Red Hat has a couple of hundred Linux kernel developers
Which still hasn't been disproven. And the original point remains intact anyway, that programmers for US companies are giving free software to the Russian, Chinese, Cuban, Iranian, North Korean, and you name it governments for free. Which of course is not a lie, is it.
claiming that I never proved that he was wrong about the number of kernel developers at Red Hat
No one has shown how many they have, all we have is my like claiming there are more at Red Hat than anywhere, so obviously again I'm not the one lying.
where he hijacked the Open Source Ping List
Hilarious! The lie was obviously that the list was open source to begin with. If I can't use it, it's not open source, so it is just another lie by newbi3 when he claims it is.
defending Planned Parenthood
How is that a lie, and free condoms for aids infested areas of Africa as I specifically mentioned is a worthwhile program.
GE says Stallman is a whacko leftist
You call this a lie? The man with his own "Manifesto" to charge everyone taxes for their "free" software, and invented the term "copyleft" verses the normal "copyright". You're saying Stallman isn't a "whacko leftist"? Check his own website then, especially his political articles www.stallman.org Here he is saying that he's leaving the thread
Yeah I did go back on what I said there. But only after this exact same list of BS was posted about me, in a failed attempt to smear.
You call your list proof of MY lies newbi3? That's obviously just another long list of yours.
he complains that Cedega's not free
How is that a lie?
complains that Linux is free
Because as I said in that post foreign governments get to make free copies and run their computers on it. How is that a lie?
recommending free Solaris
How does that make me a liar? Solaris doesn't use the Free Sofware Foundation license put out by that radical leftist Stallman. Plus it's bonafide American Unix, not a foriegn fake like Linux.
criticizing Linux because it doesn't run Windows apps
Go back and actually try to read, I was criticising it for not having much "commercial software", since most of its users want everything for free. Still not a lie.
Solaris...Apple...
Good ole American Unix, not related to that leftist whacko Stallman you parrot all the time.
he's criticizing others for namecalling
Rightfully so, its what most of you do as soon as I start debunking your BS. Now you're saying I lied repeatedly but you haven't shown one yet.
refuses to provide a link to MY posts (he just linked to my history instead)
Hysterical! How is that a lie? And of course, FLAMMING DEATH has been posting on all the linix lie threads too, just as his history shows.
where he refers to Dell "systems"
Follow my links, those companies made it almost impossible for those callers to buy a Linux system from them. Not impossible, almost impossible, which is why they were complaining. How is that a lie? Looks like you're the one that's actually been caught lying again, doesn't it.
here is where he claims he will admit mistakes
As I just did on this very thread. How is that a lie? You're still the only one lying, and still haven't admitted it, just attack me for pointing it out to everyone like usual.
claiming that Red Hat has a couple of hundred Linux kernel developers
Which still hasn't been disproven. And the original point remains intact anyway, that programmers for US companies are giving free software to the Russian, Chinese, Cuban, Iranian, North Korean, and you name it governments for free. Which of course is not a lie, is it.
claiming that I never proved that he was wrong about the number of kernel developers at Red Hat
No one has shown how many they have, all we have is my like claiming there are more at Red Hat than anywhere, so obviously again I'm not the one lying.
where he hijacked the Open Source Ping List
Hilarious! The lie was obviously that the list was open source to begin with. If I can't use it, it's not open source, so it is just another lie by newbi3 when he claims it is.
defending Planned Parenthood
How is that a lie, and free condoms for aids infested areas of Africa as I specifically mentioned is a worthwhile program.
GE says Stallman is a whacko leftist
You call this a lie? The man with his own "Manifesto" to charge everyone taxes for their "free" software, and invented the term "copyleft" verses the normal "copyright". You're saying Stallman isn't a "whacko leftist"? Check his own website then, especially his political articles www.stallman.org. Or have somebody else do it, that we can trust.
Here he is saying that he's leaving the thread
Yeah I did go back on what I said there. But only after this exact same list of BS was posted about me, in a failed attempt to smear.
You call your list proof of MY lies newbi3? That's obviously just another long list of yours.
You're not up to date.
The Current Golden Eagle Lie List:
(Now includes hypocrisy!).
Here, he complains that Cedega's not free: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1591595/posts?page=115#115
and then, mocks another user for suggesting that Cedega be free: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1591595/posts?page=134#134
then complains that Linux is free: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1530486/posts?page=40#40
and here he is, recommending free Solaris: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1490554/posts?page=21#21
Here he is, criticizing Linux because it doesn't run Windows apps: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1591595/posts?q=1&&page=101#115
and copping out when challenged about Windows inability to run Linux apps: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1591595/posts?page=118#118
Here he is, recommending Solaris, which doesn't run Windows apps: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1490554/posts?page=21#21
...and Apple, which doesn't either: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1573697/posts?page=9#9
Here, he's criticizing others for namecalling: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1584107/posts?page=29#29
And here he is, namecalling: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1583531/posts?page=61#61
Here's where he refers to Dell "systems": http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1585665/posts?page=35#35
Then denies his own words: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1585665/posts?page=137#137
then blames me for it all, saying I should have reminded him of his own words: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1585665/posts?page=165#165
Then, here's where he makes more false accusations of ME: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?page=90#90
and here's where I ask him to prove I said the things he accused me of: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?page=92#92
And refuses to provide a link to MY posts (he just linked to my history instead): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?page=95#95
And fails again to prove what he says: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?page=99#99
And yet again, repeating the accusations, but failing to provide proof: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?page=122#122
And now, where his "proof" is something I didn't even post: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=125#125
and where he has the nerve to ask another poster to back up what they say with specific examples, despite the fact that he refused to do so for me: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=255#255
and here is where he demands that yet someone ELSE provide a link to prove what THEY said: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1568848/posts?page=68#68
and here is where he claims he will admit mistakes, despite the fact that he hasn't admitted this one: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592494/posts?page=43#43
Here he is claiming that Red Hat has a couple of hundred Linux kernel developers: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1527263/posts?page=49#49
And here he is claiming no one knows how many kernel developers work for Red Hat: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1527263/posts?page=77#77
and yet, he denies that he said hundreds, yet again (21st paragraph): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=131#131
And here he is getting nailed for it yet again:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=132#132
and again: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=137#137
and claiming that I never proved that he was wrong about the number of kernel developers at Red Hat: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=134#134
Here's where he hijacked the Open Source Ping List, and the ensuing discussion: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1571222/posts?page=8#8
Here he is ridiculing another poster for using bold fonts to make a point: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1493462/posts?page=130#130
And here he is using bold fonts to make a point: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=106#106
Here he is defending Microsoft's contributions to Planned Parenthood: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1492595/posts?page=22#22
And here he is defending Planned Parenthood itself: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1601565/posts?page=35#33
and again: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1601565/posts?page=40#40
Here is a Linux thread with only one post by GE (notice how pleasant and peaceful): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1500664/posts?q=1&&page=1
Here is a Linux thread where GE stayed and trolled (well beyond 280 posts, totally off the topic. No insults before he showed up, as with many of his threads. He has stated multiple times that he was leaving, yet he keeps posting, because he's a last word freak): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1592292/posts?q=1&&page=1#1
Here's where GE says Stallman is a whacko leftist: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1601565/posts?page=24#24
Here's where I agree: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1601565/posts?page=30#30
And here's where he disagrees that I agree: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1601565/posts?page=30#31
Here he is saying that he's leaving the thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?page=127#127
and here he is, many days and over 100 posts later, still posting: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1592292/posts?q=1&&page=281#284
Here is where GE masters time travel and brags that he's been a Freeper since '95: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/950193/posts?page=285#285
Here's where Jim Robinson tells about creating Freerepublic in '96: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1011545/posts