To: Coyoteman
You all just go ahead and ignore the data. You wouldn't believe it anyway, so you might as well go on back to sleep.How CAN they believe it? How can they believe that a skull can be 500,000 years old when they KNOW that the world has only been around for 6,000 years?
Remember - all the dinosaurs lived together with the humans in Bedrock, along with Fred, Barney, BamBam and Dino.
15 posted on
03/24/2006 12:08:01 PM PST by
Tokra
(I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
To: Tokra
Gee, only a 300,000 year gap between the
assumed date of the skull.
And the skull is assumed to be a hominid, something that cannot even be proven to have existed.
What great science.
To: Tokra
How can they believe that a skull can be 500,000 years old when they KNOW that the world has only been around for 6,000 years?
Stereotyping isn't a very scientific method.
65 posted on
03/24/2006 2:32:14 PM PST by
Fawnn
(Canteen wOOhOO Consultant and CookingWithPam.com person - Faith makes things possible, not easy.)
To: Tokra
PROOF!
394 posted on
03/26/2006 12:03:39 AM PST by
sully777
(wWBBD: What would Brian Boitano do?)
To: Tokra
I think the problem is that they look at the Bible too literally. I see no problem between religion and science (which just explains the world around us -- every time science moves into the what-ifs, it takes on the aspects of religion and philosophy).
421 posted on
03/26/2006 8:17:38 PM PST by
Cronos
(Remember 9/11. Restore Hagia Sophia! Ultra-Catholic: Sola Scriptura leads to solo scriptura.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson