Skip to comments.
For ABC News, Unnamed Sources are Questionable. Sometimes.
NewsBusters.org ^
| 3/17/2006
| NewsBusters
Posted on 03/17/2006 8:35:49 AM PST by Mike Bates
ABC News' Internet site yesterday reported on summaries of four Iraqi documents from Saddam Hussein's government that were released by the U.S. government Wednesday. The first is an Iraqi intelligence service document tracing a relationship between Osama bin Laden and Hussein's government. ABC News then added an "Editor's Note," which in part states:
"While the assertions contained in this document clearly support the claim (of a bin Laden-Hussein connection), the sourcing is questionable i.e. an unnamed Afghan 'informant' reporting on a conversation with another Afghan 'consul.' The date of the document four days after 9/11 is worth noting but without further corroboration, this document is of limited evidentiary value."
Oh, OK, ABC News considers unnamed sources questionable. A valid position, if it were consistent. But ABC News isn't, and regularly quotes unnamed sources without going out of its way to highlight their questionability.
Only last month the networks Internet site carried a story titled, "Cheney Controversy Persists." According to the article's second paragraph:
"Sources told ABC News that the vice president's team had debated issuing a statement early Sunday morning per the White House's request. But sources said Cheney's team decided it would be more credible to allow ranch owner and witness Katharine Armstrong to make the information public."
The piece should have included a warning to readers that, since the sources used are unnamed, their assertions are questionable and of limited value. I'm sure not adding that was merely an oversight on the part of ABC News.
TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: abcnews; fakebutaccurate; iraqiintelligence; prewardocs
To: Mike Bates
2
posted on
03/17/2006 8:36:53 AM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: Mike Bates
Probably because their unnamed sources don't have names (as in don't exist).
3
posted on
03/17/2006 8:59:18 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(There are good terrorists.............. DEAD ONES.)
To: Mike Bates
MSM - a little bit of fact, a little bit of gossip.
4
posted on
03/17/2006 9:10:28 AM PST
by
Millee
(Don't make me get out my voodoo doll out!)
To: Mike Bates
To: Mike Bates; Chena; Valin; M. Thatcher; DocRock; Calpernia; Madame Dufarge; Txsleuth; Peach; ...
For ABC News, Unnamed Sources are Questionable. Sometimes.Release of Classified PreWar Docs ping. If you want to be added or removed to the ping list, please Freepmail me.
Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents
To: Mike Bates
"While the assertions contained in this document clearly support the claim (of a bin Laden-Hussein connection), the sourcing is questionable i.e. an unnamed Afghan 'informant' reporting on a conversation with another Afghan 'consul.' The date of the document four days after 9/11 is worth noting but without further corroboration, this document is of limited evidentiary value." LOL, they are getting nervous.
7
posted on
03/17/2006 9:57:55 AM PST
by
tiredoflaundry
(I'll admit it , I'm a Snow Flake !(Snoq) The rest of my tagline redacted by court order.)
To: eyespysomething
8
posted on
03/17/2006 10:33:07 AM PST
by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
To: Millee
Is that like a little bit country, a little bit rock & roll?
9
posted on
03/17/2006 10:41:28 AM PST
by
Mike Bates
(Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
10
posted on
03/17/2006 10:44:21 AM PST
by
Mike Bates
(Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
To: eyespysomething
11
posted on
03/17/2006 10:48:29 AM PST
by
Mike Bates
(Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
To: eyespysomething; DAVEY CROCKETT; justche; Pepper777; Calpernia; Velveeta; Honestly; ...
12
posted on
03/17/2006 11:27:12 AM PST
by
nw_arizona_granny
(TODAY WOULD BE A GOOD DAY FOR LOTS OF HEAVY PRAYING, THE WORLD NEEDS YOUR PRAYERS.)
To: Mike Bates
I'm finally starting to realize why the Bush Admin. has been so closed-mouth on these issues. Between the Libs and MSM telling falsehoods to the American people and calling Bush a liar everyday, any attempt to refute these allegations would be like ramming your head into a concrete wall, a complete waste of energy. I suspect the timing of the release of these documents (during an election year) will leave a lot of Libs with mud on their faces and much explaining to their constituents.
To: wolfcreek
A majority of lefties will still mouth the same platitudes, e.g., "Bush lied people died." Remember, truth to a leftie is like garlic to a werewolf.
14
posted on
03/19/2006 1:53:41 PM PST
by
attiladhun2
(evolution has both deified and degraded humanity)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson