To: birbear
Marino would be my pick as the #1 quarterback of all time. Anyone who thinks championships are an accurate indicator of a QBs talent and value to his team should consider this: John Elway won two Super Bowls with the Broncos long after he had passed his prime -- and at a time when his contribution to the Denver team were secondary at best.
121 posted on
09/14/2005 3:00:55 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
To: Alberta's Child
"Anyone who thinks championships...."
Wins and losses, baby...that is a QB's measuring stick...
143 posted on
09/14/2005 3:08:32 PM PDT by
dakine
To: Alberta's Child
Marino has the stats, but not the rings. His QB rating was not that great either.
207 posted on
09/14/2005 3:32:34 PM PDT by
kabar
To: Alberta's Child
Marino would be my pick as the #1 quarterback of all time. Anyone who thinks championships are an accurate indicator of a QBs talent and value to his team should consider this: John Elway won two Super Bowls with the Broncos long after he had passed his prime -- and at a time when his contribution to the Denver team were secondary at best.
I dunno. I'd have a hard time picking between Marino and Montana. I think Marino had more raw talent as a QB than most other QBs...but Montana had such a light touch that ANYBODY could catch his passes.
Thus, I think Marino is only "great" if he has experienced receivers catching for him. But Montana becomes "great" with lesser receivers.
Which begs the question... would Montana (and Young) have the numbers they had if they weren't throwing to Jerry Rice?
Would Jerry Rice be as great if he were catching throws from a second rate QB?
hmmmmm
229 posted on
09/14/2005 3:57:15 PM PDT by
birbear
(Admit it. you clicked on the "I have already previewed" button without actually previewing the post.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson