Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jeb Bush: I'd love to help, but I can't
WorldNetDaily ^ | March 27, 2005 | WorldNetDaily.com

Posted on 03/28/2005 8:02:29 AM PST by FR_addict

Florida governor says he doesn't have power from Constitution to intervene

Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, the man said to be the last hope for Terri Schiavo, says he's powerless to help the brain-injured woman who has been without nourishment for more than nine full days.

"I cannot violate a court order," Bush told CNN following Easter church services. "I don't have powers from the United States Constitution or – for that matter from the Florida Constitution – that would allow me to intervene after a decision has been made."

To Terri's parents, Bush said, "I can't. I'd love to, but I can't."

Speaking to the media for the first time in three days, the governor added, "I'm sad that she's in the situation that she's in. I feel bad for her family. My heart goes out to the Schindlers and, for that matter, to [her husband] Michael," Bush said. "This has not been an easy thing for any, any member of the family. But most particularly for Terri Schiavo."

Meanwhile, protests have continued outside the hospice where Terri is being cared for. With security having been doubled, five people were taken into custody as pastors tried to bring Schiavo Easter communion.

A handful of people in wheelchairs got out of them and shouted, "We're not dead yet!" as they lay in the driveway.

Larry Klayman, founder of the legal watchdog group Judicial Watch, said Bush has the power to grant her clemency, just as he would in a death-row case.

"We're asking the governor for a stay of execution on Easter Sunday, a day of mercy,'' Klayman said. "For Jeb Bush not to act would be a dereliction of his duty to the people of the state of Florida.''

Terri has been the subject of worldwide attention since Florida Judge George Greer ordered her feeding tube removed March 18, and courts have upheld his decision not to have the tube reinserted.

An attorney for Terri's parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, painted a grim picture of the situation on CBS' "Face the Nation."

"Terri is declining rapidly," Schindler attorney David Gibbs said. "We believe at this point she has passed where physically she would be able to recover."

But Randall Terry, a pro-life activist speaking for Terri's parents, called Gibbs' description "absolutely untrue."

George Felos, the attorney for Michael Schiavo says Terri's breathing has been regular, and her death does not appear imminent. He told reporters her remains would be cremated and buried in a family plot in Pennsylvania.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: allterri; allthetime; bush; bushsucks; bushwasheshishands; frdeathcultists; insaneterribots; jeb; jebbush; klaymanklown; pontiuspilate; schiavo; schindler; smearjeb; terri; terri247; terripalooza
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 401-402 next last
To: tfecw
Typical Thanks for showing your true colors.

And thank you for showing yours. Just hide behind that party label when the going gets tough and the consequences of doing the right thing are inconvenient for future elections.

201 posted on 03/28/2005 10:30:03 AM PST by GOPcapitalist ("Marxism finds it easy to ally with Islamic zealotism" - Ludwig von Mises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn
If it is idiocy to say Bush is wrong for doing nothing then the United States owes a number of apologies to the families of Nazi officials we put to death because they did nothing to stop the Holocaust.


202 posted on 03/28/2005 10:30:38 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Amen, dear Saundra ... Amen


203 posted on 03/28/2005 10:30:46 AM PST by Pegita ('Tis so sweet to trust in Jesus, just to take Him at His Word ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: GOPcapitalist

Sure happy to help you out on that.


204 posted on 03/28/2005 10:32:56 AM PST by tfecw (Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn
... I contend that killing this woman is wrong. ...

And I contend that allowing this woman to pass is right. I further contend that in your disruption you pretend not to distinguish killing from dying, nor the function of war.

Got anymore phoney analogies which you can use to stimulate the stupid?

205 posted on 03/28/2005 10:33:34 AM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: drjimmy

I'm not physicaly leaving - my statement was meant to convey the idea that the America created by our founding fathers is now truly dead. The only leaving I would do is to any state that has the courage to secede and return to the constitutional republic we were actually founded upon.


206 posted on 03/28/2005 10:39:11 AM PST by Conservative_Rob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

Amazingly ghoulish parsing there, characterizing a specious execution of a disabled woman as 'allowing her to pass'. I suppose you're one of those self-blinded folk who claim she's been gone for fifteen years also. Nice closed loop you've construct to protect your mind from truth or even rational weighing of facts. But then we don't expect much from your ilk, just doing your best to further culture of death. Good job.


207 posted on 03/28/2005 10:40:02 AM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: badbass
Evidently, the law doesn't matter, just who is in charge at any given moment in time, and how willing they are to ignore the law.

Alas, Jeb Bush is NOT willing to ignore what he imagines to be the "law". Right about now we need some holy lawlessness ("obey God rather than men"), but what we're getting is the other kind.

the only issue I'm "fanatical" about is being anti-gun control. Truly, they are your last line of defence, because all of this other crap will fail you at some point.

Ditto.

208 posted on 03/28/2005 10:41:26 AM PST by Rytwyng (we're here, we're Huguenots, get used to us...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: OMalley
If you believe that Judges are "The Law" then you are wrong. If you believe that every Judicial Order is lawful -- then you are wrong. If you believe that every Judicial Order reveiwed and not struck down by appealate courts up to the Supreme Courts is lawful -- you are wrong.

It is the Judicial Order by Greer that is illegal. The Governor or the President can and should rescue this woman from her murderers -- to not do so is to fail at their resposibility to The Law. The real Law.

And there is plenty of room within all the nuances of the state and federal laws for them to act boldly.

209 posted on 03/28/2005 10:42:05 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: drjimmy
"no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law..." (emphasis added)

Are you insinuating Terri isn't a 'person'? I honestly confused by your statement.

Anyway, in the matter of due process..:

"No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, property or of any right granted him by statute, unless matter involved first shall have been adjudicated against him upon trial conducted according to established rules regulating judicial proceedings, and it forbids condemnation without a hearing,
Pettit v. Penn., La.App., 180 So.2d 66, 69."
Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 500.

"Due Process of law implies the right of the person affected thereby to be present before the tribunal which pronounces judgement upon the question of life, liberty, or property, in its most comprehensive sense; to be heard, by testimony or otherwise, and to have the right of controverting, by proof, every material fact which bears on the question of right in the matter involved. If any question of fact or liability be conclusively presumed against him, this is not due process of law."
Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 500.

THAT means a persons life CANNOT be forfeit unless;
1. They have been charged with a crime, and 2. They have been judged guilty by a JURY!

Anything else is ultra vires, or beyond the legal scope and power of government.

Again, this *judicial fiat* is contrary to the laws of our country as well as the oaths sworn by ALL public or elected officials to uphold the respective Constitutions and the principals for which they stand.

210 posted on 03/28/2005 10:42:11 AM PST by MamaTexan (I am NOT a *legal entity*, nor am I a 'person' as defined by law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: badbass

"I did just send him an email, stating that the point of law needing to be reviewede is why Terri hasn't been granted a divorce from Michael Schiavo because of adultery..."

Mt assumption would be because she didn't ask or file for it???


211 posted on 03/28/2005 10:42:45 AM PST by Hand em their arse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan
principals = principles

Goofy spell-checker!

212 posted on 03/28/2005 10:45:15 AM PST by MamaTexan (I am NOT a *legal entity*, nor am I a 'person' as defined by law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
After 10 days, doesn't it seem quite obvious she is not being allowed to pass, but forced to? For God's sake...
213 posted on 03/28/2005 10:45:19 AM PST by workerbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

Denying food and water to someone is "letting them die".

There's a job waiting for you as Propaganda Minister to the People's Republic of China.

They won't execute people anymore...they'll just 'let them die'.

Maybe your children will 'let you die' someday and then you can experience how pleasant it is to die of dehydration and starvation.

Ah, but your children will be 'letting you pass'.

That sounds so much nicer than MURDER.


214 posted on 03/28/2005 10:45:43 AM PST by PeterFinn ("Tolerance" means WE have to tolerate THEM. They can hate us all they want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan
Don't get upset when liberals assassinate a Republican President when they don't like the outcome of an election. Anarchy is a two edged sword and applies to BOTH parties. We are a country of law and order. The positive action would be to have laws speak up for those that can't when there is doubt. In this situation there is doubt.
215 posted on 03/28/2005 10:46:08 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
... I suppose you're one of those self-blinded folk who claim she's been gone for fifteen years also.

Nah, she's right there, just nothing happenin' upstairs. Doesn't matter, anyway, judicial ilk has found and religious ilk is outta luck. Tear the hair from you head, blame the evil republicans and move to a mountaintop. You'll be safe until Rome builds a road.

216 posted on 03/28/2005 10:46:12 AM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Hand em their arse

I'm pretty sure her parents did.


217 posted on 03/28/2005 10:47:09 AM PST by badbass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

WHY did people elect someone like Greer as their Judge?

My understanding is that HE is what they people wanted.

Maybe it takes Terri's death to wake them up and laws need to be changed to protect those when there is doubt.


218 posted on 03/28/2005 10:47:39 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

Dear 68 grunt,

Well, initially the Germans thought to starve to death concentration camp occupant St. Maximillian Kolbe. Eventually, they decided he was taking too long to die, and killed him with an injection of carbolic acid.

So, I guess to escape punishment, the folks who ran the concetnration camps should have just withheld food and water from all the folks in the camps, huh? Woulda been a lot cheaper, too.

Then they would have just been letting all those people pass. Wouldn't be killing, huh?


sitetest


219 posted on 03/28/2005 10:48:27 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Mad Mammoth
Governor Reagan in California, and later, President Reagan, would have rejected that whining 'oh I've done all I can do' crapola, the Gipper would have had State National Guard troops and/or federal marshalls rescuing Terri Schiavo and would have had his Attorney General place that scumbag Greer under arrest for leading an insurrection.

Ronald Reagan actually BELIEVED in upholding the Constitution

I believe that he would have called out the troops also.

220 posted on 03/28/2005 10:48:34 AM PST by pollywog (Psalm 121;1 I Lift my eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 401-402 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson