Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PeterFinn
... I contend that killing this woman is wrong. ...

And I contend that allowing this woman to pass is right. I further contend that in your disruption you pretend not to distinguish killing from dying, nor the function of war.

Got anymore phoney analogies which you can use to stimulate the stupid?

205 posted on 03/28/2005 10:33:34 AM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]


To: 68 grunt

Amazingly ghoulish parsing there, characterizing a specious execution of a disabled woman as 'allowing her to pass'. I suppose you're one of those self-blinded folk who claim she's been gone for fifteen years also. Nice closed loop you've construct to protect your mind from truth or even rational weighing of facts. But then we don't expect much from your ilk, just doing your best to further culture of death. Good job.


207 posted on 03/28/2005 10:40:02 AM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

To: 68 grunt
After 10 days, doesn't it seem quite obvious she is not being allowed to pass, but forced to? For God's sake...
213 posted on 03/28/2005 10:45:19 AM PST by workerbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

To: 68 grunt

Denying food and water to someone is "letting them die".

There's a job waiting for you as Propaganda Minister to the People's Republic of China.

They won't execute people anymore...they'll just 'let them die'.

Maybe your children will 'let you die' someday and then you can experience how pleasant it is to die of dehydration and starvation.

Ah, but your children will be 'letting you pass'.

That sounds so much nicer than MURDER.


214 posted on 03/28/2005 10:45:43 AM PST by PeterFinn ("Tolerance" means WE have to tolerate THEM. They can hate us all they want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

To: 68 grunt

Dear 68 grunt,

Well, initially the Germans thought to starve to death concentration camp occupant St. Maximillian Kolbe. Eventually, they decided he was taking too long to die, and killed him with an injection of carbolic acid.

So, I guess to escape punishment, the folks who ran the concetnration camps should have just withheld food and water from all the folks in the camps, huh? Woulda been a lot cheaper, too.

Then they would have just been letting all those people pass. Wouldn't be killing, huh?


sitetest


219 posted on 03/28/2005 10:48:27 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

To: 68 grunt

".. I contend that killing this woman is wrong. ...

And I contend that allowing this woman to pass is right. I further contend that in your disruption you pretend not to distinguish killing from dying, nor the function of war."

Anyone who contends that starving someone to death is NOT killing them is pretty close to brain-dead themselves.


247 posted on 03/28/2005 11:09:30 AM PST by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

To: 68 grunt

She is not being "allowed to pass". She is being murdered. She is being denied the most basic needs of survival. That is just plain wrong!


286 posted on 03/28/2005 12:03:53 PM PST by Scarlet Pimpernel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson