Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jeb Bush: I'd love to help, but I can't
WorldNetDaily ^ | March 27, 2005 | WorldNetDaily.com

Posted on 03/28/2005 8:02:29 AM PST by FR_addict

Florida governor says he doesn't have power from Constitution to intervene

Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, the man said to be the last hope for Terri Schiavo, says he's powerless to help the brain-injured woman who has been without nourishment for more than nine full days.

"I cannot violate a court order," Bush told CNN following Easter church services. "I don't have powers from the United States Constitution or – for that matter from the Florida Constitution – that would allow me to intervene after a decision has been made."

To Terri's parents, Bush said, "I can't. I'd love to, but I can't."

Speaking to the media for the first time in three days, the governor added, "I'm sad that she's in the situation that she's in. I feel bad for her family. My heart goes out to the Schindlers and, for that matter, to [her husband] Michael," Bush said. "This has not been an easy thing for any, any member of the family. But most particularly for Terri Schiavo."

Meanwhile, protests have continued outside the hospice where Terri is being cared for. With security having been doubled, five people were taken into custody as pastors tried to bring Schiavo Easter communion.

A handful of people in wheelchairs got out of them and shouted, "We're not dead yet!" as they lay in the driveway.

Larry Klayman, founder of the legal watchdog group Judicial Watch, said Bush has the power to grant her clemency, just as he would in a death-row case.

"We're asking the governor for a stay of execution on Easter Sunday, a day of mercy,'' Klayman said. "For Jeb Bush not to act would be a dereliction of his duty to the people of the state of Florida.''

Terri has been the subject of worldwide attention since Florida Judge George Greer ordered her feeding tube removed March 18, and courts have upheld his decision not to have the tube reinserted.

An attorney for Terri's parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, painted a grim picture of the situation on CBS' "Face the Nation."

"Terri is declining rapidly," Schindler attorney David Gibbs said. "We believe at this point she has passed where physically she would be able to recover."

But Randall Terry, a pro-life activist speaking for Terri's parents, called Gibbs' description "absolutely untrue."

George Felos, the attorney for Michael Schiavo says Terri's breathing has been regular, and her death does not appear imminent. He told reporters her remains would be cremated and buried in a family plot in Pennsylvania.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: allterri; allthetime; bush; bushsucks; bushwasheshishands; frdeathcultists; insaneterribots; jeb; jebbush; klaymanklown; pontiuspilate; schiavo; schindler; smearjeb; terri; terri247; terripalooza
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 401-402 next last
To: PeterFinn
restore our elected leaders to control of our country

They don't want it.

101 posted on 03/28/2005 9:05:27 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texas Deb
He rescues her -- she shows life and a will-to-live. She may in fact die in custody -- but just to have her in loving non-murderous hands would be worth it to her and to all who love life.

The likelyhood, imo, is that her intentions will be evident and will be recorded by video, audio and more reliable witnesses than the evil Greer has allowed.

Trust in Providence.

102 posted on 03/28/2005 9:05:43 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: glennaro

folks I think we need to keep this in perspective as a process. We must keep evolving our conservative candidats and our majority. A lawton chiles would NEVER have even participated in this. A president clinton would have shed a crocodile tear and felt her pain. A majority leader Dashel would have been "very disappointed".

Would democrats ahve defied push polls? (formulated to give them cover in any scenario)

What did Texans do after the Alamo?
What did Americans do after Pearl Harbor?
What did Citizens do after the Masss Supreme Court attacked marriage?

Instead of whining, about J. Bush who is term limited out of the governorship in 2006 we should be wondering who will be out next governor? Who is going to run agains Nelson (d)?

How are we going to get more NONwacko judges into office?

2006 is not far away folks.


103 posted on 03/28/2005 9:05:49 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn; Howlin; Peach; DCPatriot
You really have your head up your a$$, don't you?

Here's what passes for debate on these threads.

If GWB doesn't have the balls to tell the courts to go pound sand then what happens when he has to face a REAL enemy like China?

He's also longing for a dictator. IOW, he wants us to adopt the Chinese governing model, whom he hates.

104 posted on 03/28/2005 9:05:55 AM PST by sinkspur (I'm in the WPPFF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Unfortunately there is nothing I can do legally for Terri. And unfortunately Jeb could have acted legally and reigned in runaway courts all in one swoop.

He's not king, he's not God. He can do what you can do -- barge in -- nothing more.

105 posted on 03/28/2005 9:06:05 AM PST by AmishDude (The Clown Prince-in-a-can of Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain; jpsb

"You get it and a few others get it."


But only because you registered before Sir Gawain.


106 posted on 03/28/2005 9:06:54 AM PST by tfecw (Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Mad Mammoth

I do have strong admiration for both Jeb and President Bush, I have for both for years. I don't give a rat's behind what you want to call me. However, I think your misguided anger is directed in the wrong place.

I know Jeb and President Bush did all they could other than to be arrested. If by doing that you would have Saved Terri.. I would be suprised. Because they were stopped by Court Order. As I said.. your not a conservative. Start your own party... but you are not one of us.


107 posted on 03/28/2005 9:07:44 AM PST by JFC ( President Bush, You are being prayed for along with our country daily, by millions of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict; Admin Moderator

Much better! Thanks AM!


108 posted on 03/28/2005 9:08:07 AM PST by freedumb2003 (First you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women (HJ Simpson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn
An unjust law and unjust court rulings are no law at all.

I am in total agreement. You are a very wise person.

109 posted on 03/28/2005 9:08:13 AM PST by Renatus (C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

Where are you loonies coming from?


110 posted on 03/28/2005 9:08:42 AM PST by JFC ( President Bush, You are being prayed for along with our country daily, by millions of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Has it come to this? Is it now the position of the right-to-life movement that divorce ought to be granted automatically under some circumstances, without the spouse even asking for it?

If I'm not mistaken, there was a request for divorce filed by the parents. Our hero, that great font of wisdom and knowledge, Judge Greer dismissed it.

I ask you this, is it now the position of the death cult(ure)that a person should be killed by the state without knowing for a fact that there is no hope? Or that this POS called a "husband" might possibly be responsible for her injuries in the first place; and, knowing that he is an adulterer, at the very least, might possibly have an ulterior motive for wanting his actual WIFE's death.

I'll err on the side of life everytime, given these circumstances. To do otherwise is just not right, and I don't care what you, some stupid judge, or anyone else says about it. Justice must be served. If the law conflicts with justice, then the law be damned. History shows lots of laws that were in retrospect, null, because they conflicted with justice.

The evidence is, the man is an adulterer, and thus has given up any right to control his wife's affairs, especially whether she should live or die. Facts are facts, and they're very hard to get away from. This POS MICHAEL SCHIAVO IS AN ADULTERER. There are 2 living, breathing children as proof. Ex-husbands should not have the right of life and death over ex-wives. In the eyes of God (and every State Law I've ever heard of), an adulterer can be considered an ex-spouse. Just because she is unable to file the papers, or some asinine potentate of a judge is too stupid to see it, doesn't make it any less right.

111 posted on 03/28/2005 9:08:45 AM PST by badbass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JFC
Because they were stopped by Court Order.

You type it, but you don't really understand the importance of it.

112 posted on 03/28/2005 9:08:47 AM PST by Sir Gawain (Jeb Pilate and the Republican Congress: Standing by while someone dies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
What is it with these noobs who keep telling me to leave? You don't represent the opinion of FR so you're wasting your time.

Exactly. These chowderheads can't stand the fact that the President and Governor Bush have sadly failed to uphold their respective oaths to defend the Constitution of the United States from 'all enemies, foreign and domestic'. Anyone who dares to point out such failure is automatically labeled 'not a conservative'. A TRUE conservative President and/or Governor would have refused to knuckle under to a pipsqueak probate judge in some backwater county in Florida.

The fact is, I have supported our President (and Jeb Bush) through thick and thin, but when it came down to defending our Republic and our Constitution, they both failed to 'stand and deliver'.

I stand with the Constitution. I will not stand with someone who is unable to defend that sacred Document.
113 posted on 03/28/2005 9:09:37 AM PST by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

One day... perhaps.. I will become as smart as you are.


114 posted on 03/28/2005 9:10:17 AM PST by JFC ( President Bush, You are being prayed for along with our country daily, by millions of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: johnmilken

Amen.


115 posted on 03/28/2005 9:10:25 AM PST by PeterFinn ("Tolerance" means WE have to tolerate THEM. They can hate us all they want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JFC
The law is the law and what good would it do for Jeb to break the law? He wanted to do more, but his hands are tied.

Which law are these people asking Jeb Bush to break?

Please cite any law-any bill passed by both houses of the Florida Legislature, and signed by a governor (that's what a law is)-that Jeb Bush would be breaking by rescuing Mrs. Schiavo from court-ordered death.

116 posted on 03/28/2005 9:11:59 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Dear Jim Noble,

I thought the JUDGES made the laws.


sitetest


117 posted on 03/28/2005 9:13:37 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: glennaro
We're contrasting violating a judge's ruling to stop the court-ordered starvation of a young, innocent, disabled woman to violating a state law in order to subvert a 5000-year-old institution.

Just want to make sure that you see there is a distinction here.

Indeed, there is a distinction. It is, however, important the way we behave when we express our beliefs and wishes in both issues. If we all start acting like Islamofacists or Peaceniks or people from Moveon.org, instead of the informed, intelligent, decent people who comprise the majority of the people on this forum, we seriously damage our cause.

118 posted on 03/28/2005 9:14:02 AM PST by Uncle Vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

So when the courts rule that it is not your place to interfere in a 'loving relationship' between a sixty-year old man and your eight year old boy you'll respectfully obey the decision of the courts?

Is there a court decision you won't obey?

Would you have been okay with slavery when the courts ruled it was okay?

If killing the mentally ill is ruled legal in the USA same as it has been ruled in the Netherlands (remember the USSC is now citing foreign court precedent in its own decisions) will you sit idly by while the mentally retarded are killed?

Hitler LOVED people like you.


119 posted on 03/28/2005 9:14:34 AM PST by PeterFinn ("Tolerance" means WE have to tolerate THEM. They can hate us all they want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Conservative_Rob
Good-bye USA. I will now prepare my family for the presecution to come - there is no stopping it.

Say hello to Alec Baldwin for us while you're there (wherever the "there" is that you intend to leave the USA for).
120 posted on 03/28/2005 9:14:46 AM PST by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 401-402 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson