Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could Bush be elected again? (VANITY)

Posted on 11/10/2004 12:16:38 PM PST by republicanbob1

Something I was thinking today. Could bush be elected again? I was thinking he was appointed by the Supreme Court in 2000 and this time he was elected. So technically he was only elected once. So could he run again? Im sure Bush wont run again Im not saying that at all. Just something I was curious about.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bush; idiot; trollbait; turd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-197 next last
To: republicanbob1
I believe he won the election but the supreme court had the final say in the election or am I wrong?

He was elected. The Supreme Court did not have the final say on the "election. It had the final say on whether or not the Florida Supreme Court overstepped its bounds by ordering the recounts to continue. If the Court had not acted, the voting still would have resulted in George W. Bush being certified the winner of Florida's electoral votes. The media follow-up counts proved that, ad nauseum.

81 posted on 11/10/2004 12:33:08 PM PST by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Pajama Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
>>You could enrage lefties who insist Bush was not elected in 2000. Say, when he runs again in 2008 it's ok with you right?<<

I'm going to start using this... I think it will work with some of the DIM witted lefties I know.

But first you need to get them a little enraged with the argument that he was properly elected and then, once the hook is set... go with the "Then you wouldn't mind...
82 posted on 11/10/2004 12:33:11 PM PST by ChicagoRighty (Surrounded by libbies and damn tired of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Then why would I have conservative blog if I was liberal. I cant believe this post caused so much of an issue. ha. It was just something I was thinking about. Sorry I misuderstand I thought The supreme Court had the final say in the 2000 election. I think I got my answer.


83 posted on 11/10/2004 12:33:13 PM PST by republicanbob1 (http://markedmanner.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: republicanbob1
The Supremes only said if one county was recounted they all would be recounted in Florida.


84 posted on 11/10/2004 12:33:26 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (America Wins! Kerry and the loony left suffer bitter defeat. God Bless America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: republicanbob1
I have a great suggestion for you.

Read more. Post less.

85 posted on 11/10/2004 12:33:32 PM PST by Hat-Trick (Do you trust a government that cannot trust you with guns?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicanbob1
Im not saying bush was appointed.

Then what was your original question again?

86 posted on 11/10/2004 12:34:33 PM PST by Gumption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: republicanbob1
I may be being naive, but you don't sound like a troll to me. Of course, it always helps to read the entire thread.
87 posted on 11/10/2004 12:35:28 PM PST by leadpencil1 (If a miserable failure defeated the libs, what does that make the libs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: republicanbob1

Contrary to what democrats believe, the US Supreme Court told the Florida Supreme Court that Florida had to abide by the rules that were in place when the election was held.

The democrats wanted to recount only certain very democratic counties until they were able to manufacture enough votes to call Gore the winner.

That was against Fla. own election laws and the US SC made them stop.

Got it now? It's really not that difficult to understand.


88 posted on 11/10/2004 12:35:55 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy; republicanbob1
The answer is "no", republicanbob1.

Sean Hannity had an hour on his show yesterday or Monday, inviting Libs to call in and they had 30 seconds in which to "get it all out", so maybe they could get over losing.

One of the knuckleheads called him and said that Bush could actually run again in 2008 because he was "selected, not elected" in 2000. He was a raving lunatic, too, I tell ya. Wow!


89 posted on 11/10/2004 12:36:04 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: republicanbob1

"Then why would I have conservative blog if I was liberal."

You have conservative blog. I have warts on my hands. Who cares. If your blog is no more well-informed than this post, it's useless.

You're speaking in DU talking points. Don't be silly. I don't care what you do. When you use DU talking points, you're a troll.


90 posted on 11/10/2004 12:36:22 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: republicanbob1
What's it got in it's pocketses? -Gollum
91 posted on 11/10/2004 12:36:44 PM PST by CAluvdubya (From the RED part of California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: republicanbob1

I agree with you. The mantra that "Bush was Selected not Elected" means that he can be elected in 2008. Good.


92 posted on 11/10/2004 12:36:54 PM PST by rface (Ashland, Missouri - Monthly Donor / Bad Speller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicanbob1
Not a real smart question. Only two people dumber than you and I haven't met either one of them yet.
93 posted on 11/10/2004 12:37:07 PM PST by vetvetdoug (In memory of T/Sgt. Secundino "Dean" Baldonado, Jarales, NM-KIA Bien Hoa AFB, RVN 1965)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
m curious about the life of trolls. What do you eat? Where do you shop for clothes? Who does your hair?

ROFLMAO!

94 posted on 11/10/2004 12:37:25 PM PST by Bella_Bru (Proud member of La Kosher Nostra and the IZC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tiamat; republicanbob1

I think we had a poorly worded post by a newbie. Check #70. He is trying to dig out. If he survives he will be stronger for it.


95 posted on 11/10/2004 12:37:52 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (America Wins! Kerry and the loony left suffer bitter defeat. God Bless America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoRighty
But first you need to get them a little enraged with the argument that he was properly elected and then, once the hook is set... go with the "Then you wouldn't mind...

Exactly. I've used it a couple times already and it has cased alot of hemmin and haawin.

96 posted on 11/10/2004 12:37:57 PM PST by leadpencil1 (If a miserable failure defeated the libs, what does that make the libs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: republicanbob1; Neets; Darksheare; scott0347; timpad; KangarooJacqui; The Scourge of Yazid; ...
"appointed by the Supreme Court"

I think there is a storm brewing, you might want to grab onto something

97 posted on 11/10/2004 12:38:16 PM PST by scott0347 (Commander of the 0347th Lancer Brigade, Operator of the Immaculate Steamroller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicanbob1

You may not be a troll, rb1. But unfortunately you signed up and right off displayed troll-like behavior. So of course the kitties are waking up and coming over to see what the commotion is about. If you're legit, and not a disruptor, hang in there. If you're not, well, KITTY WANTS TO PLAY WITH YOU!!!!

:-)


98 posted on 11/10/2004 12:38:40 PM PST by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Pajama Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Lady Jag

whazzzzzzup


99 posted on 11/10/2004 12:38:52 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (America Wins! Kerry and the loony left suffer bitter defeat. God Bless America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: republicanbob1
Im not saying bush was appointed. I believe he won the election but the supreme court had the final say in the election or am I wrong?

I think you are wrong. Even if the Supreme Court ruling to stop the recounts had gone against Bush, the US House of Representatives was preparing to put an end to the charade. The US House must 'certify' the Electoral Count Vote. If there were 2 results (2 different sets of electors coming out of Florida), the House, being controlled by republicans, would have selected the Republican slate of electors from Florida. End of story.

100 posted on 11/10/2004 12:38:53 PM PST by Tallguy (Don't disturb me with talk of Hillary08!..I'd just like to bask in the afterglow for a while longer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson