Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Scott from the Left Coast
Awesome, yes. Conveys great awe. And awful - awe-full, rather. Also wonderful - fills me with wonder. Words sometimes don't have the right means. Sometimes a picture can help.
12,567 posted on 03/06/2004 6:01:10 PM PST by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12559 | View Replies ]


To: Professional Engineer
Hey... what about this stroller? Just pop in the seat, and voila.

http://www.babytrend.com/Strollers/stroller1308.htm
12,568 posted on 03/06/2004 6:03:38 PM PST by msdrby (US Veterans: All give some, but some give all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12567 | View Replies ]

To: All
I'll be back in a few! I want to free up my phone line for a bit.

Stinkin' lousy dial-up! :-)
12,572 posted on 03/06/2004 6:04:41 PM PST by RMDupree (HHD: Deep roots are not reached by the frost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12567 | View Replies ]

To: JenB
It is a difficult movie to write about. I suppose I agree with the Pope: "It is as it was." The sense of realism and accuracy are startling. As for the art of it, many features and vignets stand out: I knew Satan before any words even came out of his mouth. From the moment he appeared I knew immediately that was him. So obviously, that was a perfect representation.

Another was the infamous scourging. As awful as it was, it was necessary to show in the way it was -- it's the only representation of his suffering on screen that even approaches the fact, and it more than approaches it, it captures it quite effectively. My gut wrenched when the Roman used the bone scourge and yanked it from his side. There was a physical sensation just watching it.

The flashbacks get a lot of attention because they are so important in giving the viewer both context and a physical break for a few seconds from what Christ is experiencing, portrayed so realistically in front of your eyes. The only obvious tear-jerker was with the child Jesus falling juxtaposed with him falling while carrying the cross. I thought that was tad over the top -- but those breaks in the action were absolutely necessary to the viewers ability to get a brief respite from what they were seeing.

The portrayals of the major points of decision are perfect: Jesus facing Satan in the garden; Jesus condemning himself before the Pharisees (the most critical point of all -- and done beautifully); and strangely enough Pilate's point of decision where he, seemingly against his will, succumbed to the world system -- politics -- and did what he was pre-ordained to do; Peter's denials; and Judas' making his decision for 30 pieces of silver and then attempting to backtrack later when his great and unforgivable sin became apparent to him (that was especially good as well -- particularly the aspect of him being turned over to Satan, for he KNEW Christ and yet betrayed him for money). Those decision points were fantastic -- set up and delivered perfectly.

The pathos of how no one really wanted to get involved yet when they did against their own will -- like the man who was forced to help Jesus carry the cross -- they were profoundly affected, changed, by the experience. I can never think anything but admiringly about Mel Gibson after seeing this. Both his art and his soul are of the highest calibre.

12,585 posted on 03/06/2004 6:22:03 PM PST by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12567 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson