Posted on 04/18/2026 8:11:02 AM PDT by DFG
Big Tech faces a number of challenges with the expansion of data centers, including getting the energy to power them. But if the impacts of renewable energy opposition are any indication, the local opposition to data centers is going to become a formidable opponent to the expansion of artificial intelligence.
Renewable energy requires large amounts of land, and unlike other energy sources, it requires a lot of new acreage in rural areas. Local opposition has been identified as the biggest impediment by Big Wind and Big Solar to the buildout of renewable energy.
Become fanatical, even violent
The opposition to data centers is not only rising rapidly, in some cases it’s become fanatical. An opponent of data centers fired shots into an Indiana councilman’s house and left a note reading “No Data Centers.” The councilman supported a development commission’s decision to approve a rezoning petition allowing for a data center to be developed, PBS reported.
Multiple comments on a CBS story posted on X about the shooting expressed sympathy for the attacker’s opposition. The organizations opposing the data center condemned the violence and said it doesn’t reflect their advocacy.
A man accused of throwing a Molotov cocktail at the home of Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, had writings claiming artificial intelligence will result in the extinction of the human race, NPR reported.
These extremists are on the fringe of the opposition, and most opponents aren’t using violence to advance their positions. They’re concerned about the impact of data centers on their electricity rates, views, water resources and property values. Some of those concerns aren't supported by the data, but whether or not facts support their case, Big Tech will have to contend with the opposition. Unlike renewable energy, it won’t have quite the backing of governments and subsidies to overwhelm opponents.
Experts tell Just the News that the opposition to data centers is driven by a deep distrust of Big Tech and climate groups. There are also ways that Big Tech can address some of the concerns opponents have and possibly assuage some of these community concerns.
‘Unprecedented’ opposition across U.S.
Energy expert Robert Bryce, who has tracked rejections of renewable energy projects for years, is maintaining a database of data center rejections. Between 2021 and April 7, 2026, according to Bryce’s database, 70 communities rejected or restricted data centers. A week later, Maine enacted a moratorium on new data centers.
Bryce produced a short documentary on the backlash against data centers, where he interviewed opponents of a data center facility planned by Skybox in Round Rock, Texas, which is north of Austin. The opponents in the video tell Bryce they’re worried about the impact of the 60-foot facility on their views in the neighborhood, noise, water use, property values and electricity rates.
“All those issues are in play when it comes to data centers, but then you add in the distrust or even outright hatred of big tech combined with the general public's concerns about AI, and you have a whole then range of issues that are now being used by opponents to fight these data center projects,” Bryce told Just the News.
Bryce said he’s been tracking opposition to alternative energy projects for 16 years, but he’s never seen in that time something similar to the level of opposition he’s seeing to data centers.
“This is unprecedented,” he said.
Climate activists join opposition: "A coordinated national campaign"
The American Energy Institute published a study this month that ties the opposition to networks of activist groups. The study highlights 12 organizations that are actively opposing U.S. data center development, which have collectively received millions from foreign donors.
“These are not isolated protests. They are part of a coordinated national campaign to slow the buildout of the electricity systems required for AI, manufacturing and economic growth. That directly undermines President Trump’s agenda to secure American dominance in artificial intelligence and rebuild the energy systems needed to power it,” Jason Isaac, CEO of the American Energy Institute, said in a statement.
In December, 230 activist organizations, many of which are affiliated with the dozen groups highlighted in the institute’s report, signed a letter demanding that Congress impose a national moratorium on the approval and construction of new data centers. Besides the concerns shared by many communities about data centers, the activist groups are also concerned about climate change.
Because renewable energy is unreliable, it’s not capable of doing much more than providing intermittent fuel savings for the baseload power — mainly natural gas-powered generation — upon which data centers rely. More than half of the power for data centers, the activists complain in their letter, comes from fossil fuels.
“These are not popping up like mushrooms, as everyone is making them out to be." - Gabriella Hoffman, director of energy and conservation for the Independent Women’s Center
According to the institute's study, these groups have local chapters that host anti-data center events in multiple states, and the local groups are supported with funding from national organizations.
The study argues that the opposition to data centers isn’t a spontaneous grassroots movement, but rather a well-funded coordinated campaign by groups and donors pushing a progressive agenda.
It should be noted that proponents of renewable energy made similar claims about the opposition to renewable energy. Anti-fossil fuel activists like Brown University’s J. Timmons Roberts published articles claiming that the opposition was primarily driven by oil companies afraid of competition from alternative energy sources and “climate denial” think tanks. Publications funded by anti-fossil fuel groups, such as ProPublica, also published articles painting opposition to renewable energy as being a front for oil companies’ interest.
Pathways to sustainable development
Whatever its source, the opposition to data centers stretches across the U.S. A Gallup poll released in September found that 80% of the public wants to slow down the development of AI, and 66% of adults have some level of distrust when it comes to AI’s ability to make fair and unbiased decisions.
A YouGov poll published in December found that 77% of Americans believe that AI could pose a threat to humanity. Despite the distrust, the poll also found that 35% of adults, including 51% of GenZers, use AI tools weekly.
Gabriella Hoffman, director of energy and conservation for the Independent Women’s Center, argues that many of the concerns communities have about data centers can be addressed. Hoffman told Just the News that part of what drives the opposition to data centers is a misunderstanding about what they do.
Facilities requiring large space and cooling systems go back to the 1940s, Hoffman explains in a policy paper, and the facilities handle the data for a wide range of technologies people use every day — from online purchases to emails. “These are not popping up like mushrooms, as everyone is making them out to be. And it's similar, in my opinion, to the fear mongering placed on fracking and also nuclear energy as well,” Hoffman said.
Hoffman said that, while some concerns like impacts to electricity rates are not well supported, she doesn’t dismiss all concerns people have about data centers. However, these problems have solutions, Hoffman argues.
Concerns about water usage, for example, can be addressed with closed-loop recycling. Electricity demand can be addressed with more reliable power from nuclear, natural gas, coal and geothermal.
“I think data centers can be built sustainably. We have thousands of them already. It's not as terrible as everyone makes it out to be, and unless people quit their addiction to technology, they’re going to be feeding the demand for AI data centers,” Hoffman said.
Community buy-in needed
Renewable energy has been able to, in many cases, steamroll over local concerns since it enjoyed massive subsidies and support for governments pursuing an energy transition, which has not materialized.
Bryce said that the opposition to data centers provides a path by which people can fight Big Tech, which they’ve wanted to do for some time. Activism over privacy concerns has gained little traction against these big companies, but they are winning at local zoning board hearings.
“People understand they can't fight big tech in the digital world, so they're fighting them in the physical world,” Bryce said.
Hoffman said that Big Tech will have to work on the community buy-in if they’re going to get local boards to permit their projects. Tech companies will likely be on board with a lot of what is needed to address many of the concerns. They’ve always been supportive of industry developing alongside nature preservation, and marrying the two won’t present insurmountable obstacles, Hoffman said.
“We can be judicious and practical with how AI data centers are developed without supporting moratoriums or the kind of NIMBYism [Not In My Back Yard] we're seeing,” Hoffman said.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Realistically, it really kinda has to turn violet. No matter how much people vote against it, pack, city Council meetings, whatever… They shove it down our throats. If they won’t listen to the voice of the people, there’s only one route left.
I from the White House down to the city council, our entire government has flipped the finger to the clearly stated will of the people regarding data centers and AI.
Don’t forget, Trump‘s very first act in office was to bring out Larry Ellison and announce a big Stargate project funded by the US government to the tune of something like $5 billion. The very first thing he did. I don’t remember him running on an AI enabling platform.
I’m amazed at the number of Luddites who post here on FR. Opposing AI and data centers won’t take us into the 21st Century.
If we don’t do it, China will, and we will be at a huge disadvantage.
It sucks, but it is what it is.
And I am not so sure that Data Centers, will necessarily be required.
Apple is doing a lot of work to figure out how to get the Frontier LLMs to run on local devices. So if most of the work is done on devices, why the need for so many data centers? I think in ten years a lot of those Data Centers will converted into homeless shelters.
I’m not certain I would call anyone opposed to this Luddites.
These are happening without disclosure to the public - regarding the scale of operations. Just like the future impact of AI on our lives; the people living near these facilities don’t understand the scale unless they see it somewhere else.
Not to mention, I suspect few of these construction sites are hiring locals and when they are operational I doubt locals will be needed to maintain them.
The idea violence is necessary to oppose = this will be another government vaccine or a 6 week plan to ‘slow the spread’ (in this case opposition to data centers) that becomes permanent. We failed the test in 2020/2021 as a society and in view of our elected leadership.
Jeez why don’t regular people just instantly do whatever the super rich want ?
You let the data centers in and they will force the renewal energy outfits next door. NOTTA.
Methinks there’s Chinese money funding those “protestors.”
Calling people who you disagree with is the popular thing to do. Much easier than listening, debate or understanding. Just trampling opposition is the progressive thing to do. Must have progress no matter what it takes from anyone. Money rules.
You are correct. I have no problem with data centers so long as we have adequate electricity. Make the data centers build their own electrical generation facilities on their dime if local power is not sufficient.
I am surprised that we do not have a lot of data centers in West Texas. West Texas has excesses of oil and gas for power generation.
> If we don’t do it, China will, and we will be at a huge disadvantage.
Whether we do it or not, China is already doing it, and if we don’t, we will be crushed.
Whether we do it or not, China is already doing it,
Correct.
Interesting and immediate subjugation to propaganda and fear, promulgated heavily by the left here.
Just like Covid...
Violence is NECESSARY? Geez, listen to yourselves.
Data centers are going to need power, true. But that’s the fault of decades of leftist obstructionism to nuclear power and brainwashing the public into thinking we can get by with solar and hydraulic and a lot of lithium batteries, because massive strip mining and toxic materials and electric car battery fires, let alone the sheer waste generated from massive lithium batteries is “cleaner” for the environment?
And where does all that power come from to charge those electric cars? Solar?! Our plants are at generating capacity, NOW, when electric cars are still a very small percentage of cars on the road?!
AI is both awesome and scary and as a front line software engineer I’m at the forefront of seeing something for the very first time that has me concerned for my livelihood, let alone the much broader cultural implications.
But NIMBYism, let alone taking up pitchforks to burn the witch is NOT the answer!
Well they do have the most to gain from the US losing the AI wars.
If you and your opponent are fighting with bows and arrows, and your opponent develops firearms, then you had better develop your own firearms pretty quickly. That’s not just disadvantage, that’s existential.
You also need redundant access to high volume data lines and a water source for cooling. It’s the water that’s the real sticking point for environmentalists and I’m somewhat in agreement there as I’m not sure how contaminated the water is coming up but also not sure why they couldn’t keep a retaining tank of some sort and cycle between them.
Tech companies are notoriously sensitive to things like this so I think that’d be a priority for them, too.
People are incensed that their electric bills go up to pay for it.
Gaslighting them by saying they're Luddites who are opposed to "progress" only adds to their anger.
Let these companies pay for it - all of it. Have them build their own power generation facilities.
Conspiracy nuts become violent. Likely leftists. The Fascist Left.
But I agree with you that the data center hype is probably overblown. Now is probably the time to divest from Nvidia and other AI stocks before the AI stock bubble bursts. Each massive data center in 10 years will be replaced with a room full of servers doing the same thing for much less cost, power consumption, and cooling needs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.