Posted on 09/17/2025 1:47:38 PM PDT by iontheball
Video by Mr. Rosas highlighting unusual exfoliation of evidence at the Kirk crime scene. 12 minute video.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Post 2 isn’t accurate?
Does your video show them removing the recording chips, or removing the cameras themselves?
Removing the cameras, from there it is simple to replace the chips...... or corrupt them. Fish cannot fly, birds cannot breathe underwater, and the FBI, CIA and the NSA does not tell the truth.
I listened to Dan Bongino’s interview w/Megyn Kelly yesterday and he indicated the FBI had an agent on site within 18 minutes of Charlies death and the removal of camera equipment was done by Turning Point personnel at FBI request. Bongino implied that all evidence has been properly documented and stored.
_______________________________
Let’s take that for what it’s worth, but why were they messing with the equipment? The FBI would have needed the cameras to determine the equipment that shot and recorded the video.
Were they tampering or told to take it down? Has the FBI received the camera along eith the footage? If not, why have they not asked for them?
Removing and protecting the cameras was the right thing to do, do you think they were secret enemy agents and replaced the chips with fake ones that will mislead the video forensics people who will be studying them, or would they just replace them with blank ones?
The guy showing the video says the guy was taking down the camera within 5 minutes of the shooting. He even used the CK's chair which was turned over on the ground, to stand on to reach the camera. He then took the camera down and opened it up and clearly walked away with what presumably was the card.
Maybe they were securing the cameras/chips from people planted in the audience like the old man claiming he did it, the long haired hippie type pinko fag hooting and hollering and cheering, and others.
Does your video show them removing the recording chips, or removing the cameras themselves?
_________________________
You can see the one guy working with the equipment after he took it down. He did not leave with the cameras so the assumption is he took the cameras down for a reason and that was to gain possession of the recording chips. Now the chain of custody is all screwed up, even if the guys were, as you say, doing it at the FBI’s bidding. If Bongino is half the agent he says he is he should have instructed TP to secure the crime scene and not corrupt it until they had an agent on the scene.
I bet the FBI told them to “secure the video equipment” or something similar.
The FBI didn’t want any strangers touching anything, i.e., they knew liberals would ruin the scene on purpose if given a chance.
It is video, of a widely videoed event.
A video of an event that everyone else also videoed, does it really matter that it was security handing it to the FBI 20 minutes later?
The chain of custody is not necessarily screwed up, as long as everyone in the chain can be identified and accounted for. The problem comes if the evidence is produced and it can’t be traced from one person to the next, beginning to end. There is nothing in evidentiary rulings that says everyone in the chain of custody has to be a government agent or officer of the court.
Nothing unusual about removing the camera and its recordings. This Youtuber is an idiot......
I can only refer you to Bongino’s recorded statement in the interview where he was specifically asked about this by Ms Kelly.
I have a favorable impression of Bongino w/regard to intellect, character and truthfulness. As Deputy Director of the FBI who was on site and reviewed the room of stored evidence I am inclined to believe him and accept his explanation.
Others may choose differently; that’s their decision and their right.
Anyone entering that scene should be documented as who they are and what was their purpose, crime scene protection, detectives assigned to investigate, supervisory personnel, everyone gets documented, it doesn’t matter if it was the President who traipsed through, he must be included in the reports as having been within the crime scene.
Just guessing here.... The FBI knew within a few seconds to a minute that Kirk had been shot and likely killed. Obvious political assassination attempt, which allowed FBI to get involved.
The TPUSA personnel were likely told to secure the cameras/footage so that it could be examined to try and find the shooter, you know, give him less time to get away.
People are looking for entirely too many conspiracies here.
The chain of custody is not necessarily screwed up, as long as everyone in the chain can be identified and accounted for. The problem comes if the evidence is produced and it can’t be traced from one person to the next, beginning to end. There is nothing in evidentiary rulings that says everyone in the chain of custody has to be a government agent or officer of the court.
_____________________
All I will say to your position is that a defense objection to admit those video recordings would be granted by the judge in a heartbeat. There were no photographs taken are the crime scene of the cameras, no description of the specific chips, no tagging of the chips, no evidence bag, no signing and witnessing by an two agents on an evidence ledger, in short no way to guarantee that the chips a prosecutor wants to enter in evidence is in fact the authentic chips taken from the crime scene.
That could be that is the case, if so, the FBI is aware and it isn’t an issue then. I was only going on what was mentioned, that Bongino said FBI personnel were there within 18 minutes, and the cameras were monkeyed with before that.
O honestly do not know, which is why I asked. To see if anyone knew definitively. 👍
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.