Posted on 09/16/2025 12:04:05 PM PDT by Milagros
Candace Owens has persistently spread harmful falsehoods designed to incite fear and hatred, particularly targeting Jewish communities with dangerous antisemitic tropes.
Her recent baseless claim—that Charlie Kirk, a committed supporter of Israel, who was killed by Tyler Robinson (reportedly influenced by her associate, known antisemite Nick Fuentes) was supposedly part of some Z "conspiracy” (a fabrication initially propagated by Arab supremacist Naram Susli)—is only the latest in her ongoing campaign to vilify Jews.
In a 2024 livestream viewed by over a million people, Owens escalated her attacks by falsely accusing a respected Jewish rabbi of orchestrating a murderous “Zionist plot” against her. These lies not only endanger individual lives but also perpetuate vicious stereotypes that paint Jewish people as sinister conspirators, threatening the safety and dignity of our communities.
Adding to her egregious rhetoric, Owens has also embarked on a campaign to whitewash the atrocities of Josef Mengele, the infamous Nazi “Dr. Death” whose horrific experiments on Jewish prisoners, among others, during the Holocaust represent some of the darkest crimes in history. By attempting to sanitize Mengele’s legacy, Owens not only distorts the truth but also inflicts profound pain on Jewish survivors and their descendants, undermining the memory of millions who suffered under Nazi persecution.
In a formal letter to the FBI, a concerned advocate underscored the gravity of her actions: “Candace Owens’ massive platform amplifies her toxic falsehoods. By falsely accusing a Jewish rabbi of plotting her murder as part of an alleged Zionist scheme and attempting to whitewash the crimes of Josef Mengele, she revives the blood libel—a centuries-old antisemitic lie that has fueled pogroms and violence against Jews—and desecrates the memory of Holocaust victims. Her rhetoric is a deliberate attempt to incite hatred and harm, endangering Jewish communities who have long contributed to the cultural, intellectual, and moral fabric of society.”
Owens’ obsession with demonizing Jews predates her recent fabrications. Months earlier, she concocted a baseless narrative linking a Jewish individual to Michael Jackson’s death, alleging their involvement in a fictitious Jewish conspiracy to destroy him. More recently, she claimed Jackson had named this individual among Jews targeting him, further inflaming her followers’ paranoia with these malicious delusions. She accuses Jewish individuals and their families of “lying” and “smearing” her, while she herself spreads dangerous falsehoods that jeopardize Jewish lives and undermine the values of truth, justice, and compassion that Jewish communities have championed for generations.
Her rhetoric is not mere provocation—it is a calculated effort to dehumanize Jews, portraying us as threats who deserve retribution. By invoking conspiracies of murder and control and attempting to rewrite the horrors of the Holocaust, Owens exploits the darkest antisemitic tropes, giving her followers a false justification to act on hateful impulses. This is not free speech; it is dangerous incitement cloaked in lies, threatening the safety of Jewish families, synagogues, and institutions that have long been pillars of scholarship, charity, and community.
For the sake of Jewish communities—who have endured centuries of persecution, including the unimaginable horrors of the Holocaust, yet continue to contribute profoundly to global progress—and for all who stand against hate, we must confront Candace Owens for what she is: a propagandist using her platform to spread antisemitic venom. Her deadly lies, fueled by a reckless obsession with fearmongering and historical revisionism, have real-world consequences, from synagogue vandalism to physical attacks on Jews. We must demand accountability to protect our communities, honor the resilience and contributions of Jewish people, and ensure that truth, memory, and unity prevail over hatred and division.
First, it says “reportedly”, not definitely.
See Newsweek:
https://www.newsweek.com/groyper-charlie-kirk-shooting-nick-fuentes-2129114
Tyler is a confused individual.
Actually Mengele - Candace Owens already influenced a school shooting:
And Nick Fuentes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfYitSq-QDg
She was always a lightweight. She was platformed because she is black, female and attractive. Conservatives just love it when someone who fits even one of those criteria tell them what they want to hear.
If she’d been a 300-pound white man who had to depend on talent, no one would ever know who she was.
At EoZ? Never heard of them.
She also married well and recently became Catholic.
So there’s that, too.
Sounds vaguely like the kind of comment a non-conservative would make.
YMMV tho.
Jordan tells Palestinians to die, in the name of being "pro-Palestinian"
This rant has no relation to the subject of the blog post, and no quotations from Owens.
It is posted by "Monica" whom has no followers or acknowledgements on her post, and she conflates Owens into the thread where Owens is never mentioned by anyone else, including the thread originator.
This is just a sour grapes hitpiece, and is worthless, regardless of the quality of Owens.
Do better.
It’s a good question. When I get around to reading what she said, I will apply first principles of honest discussion and open debate.
Our enemies have no weapon against them.
Here are the facts:
* Robinson had expressed anti-Trump sentiments as far back as 2017.
* He was known in his Utah hometown as being left wing while he was in high school.
* There are pictures of him wearing a shirt with the emblem of the Democratic Socialists of America.
* He was in a relationship with a man who planned to transition into a fake woman.
* He communicated his intent to kill Charlie Kirk in chat rooms with other communist perverts.
* Photos of Robinson at the time of the assassination showed him to be wearing a t-shirt similar to those worn by Antifa members.
I don't think there was a massive conspiracy, but something more akin to John Wilkes Booth and his circle of pro-Confederate associates in Washington who knew of his plans and approved of it.
brownsfan:
“She appears to be flailing trying to gain relevance.”
___
Owens can’t take it, a zionist fell victim.
I checked again, it merely says:
“reportedly influenced by her associate, known antisemite Nick Fuentes”.
REPORTEDLY.
Charlie Kirk critic Nick Fuentes fantasied about marrying 16-year-old, compared Jews killed by Nazis to ‘cookies baked in oven’.
Nick, who often praised Adolf Hitler,....
The death of Charlie Kirk, a conservative figure, has brought back focus on a conflict within the far right. This involves Nick Fuentes, a white nationalist who has faced scrutiny for his views and past associations. Nick Fuentes fantasied about marrying 16-year-old and even compared Jews killed by Nazis to ‘cookies baked in oven’.
By ET Online
Sep 13, 2025
The killing of 31-year-old conservative activist and Trump ally Charlie Kirk has reignited attention on a long-simmering feud within elements of the far right. The differences between Kirk and the so-called “Groyper” movement led by white nationalist Nick Fuentes is again back in spotlight.
https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/us-news-charlie-kirk-critic-nick-fuentes-groyper-fantasied-about-marrying-16-year-old-compared-jews-killed-by-nazis-to-cookies-baked-in-oven/articleshow/123868722.cms
I wonder if she is also being funded from the Middle East.
POST the link (s) and reliable third party verifiable articles that she authored that are antisemitic tropes?
What and when with full monologues not just snips and edits.
Put up or be shamed as trolls...............
What did she do? Did you watch her videos?
Grok on twitter can give you all the details of this saga.
I will only say this:
IF Charlie Kirk said “If I said Bibi needs to resign I would be unfairly attacked” AND ***IF**** Seth Dillion said “Everyone would think it is antisemitic”....imagine what might have happened from there in the Hamptons meetings.
AND EVEN IF NEITHER SAID IT...Kirk’s point would be valid and TRUE.
We have seen the crazy attacks here because someone voices something about Israel. I got cussed out and called antisemitic because I said Ben Shapiro needs to stay in his lane and stop trying to cash in trying to grab the “blood stained mic”.
And one more point....Tucker Carlson was central to this saga.
Watch the conversation between him and JD Vance on Kirk’s show. They were alluding to something.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.