Posted on 09/15/2025 6:24:17 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN
When Charlie Kirk was murdered on September 10, 2025, reactions across the internet followed a now-familiar pattern. Supporters expressed shock and sadness, while detractors — especially many on the progressive left — took to social media with mockery, celebration, and even open joy. For years, this kind of reaction toward controversial figures has played out online without serious consequence. In some circles, it was even encouraged.
But this time, something changed.
This time, the internet didn’t shrug. The public didn't just move on. People lost jobs. Employers issued statements. Some of those who celebrated Kirk’s death — laughing, posting memes, or expressing wishes for more deaths like his — were publicly identified and fired from their positions. And this, it seems, came as a shock to many of them.
Why?
Why were so many surprised that celebrating a man's murder would provoke backlash? Why did they think this time would be like all the others — with no consequences? The answer, I believe, reveals something deeper about how we’ve come to treat political hatred, social media, and our expectations around "acceptable" speech.
For years, political discourse — particularly online — has grown increasingly vicious. Public figures, especially conservative ones, have been fair game for mockery, distortion, and dehumanization. In that environment, celebrating the death of a figure like Charlie Kirk wasn’t just tolerated; for some, it was practically a ritual.
Many people have grown desensitized. After all, extreme statements are common — and often consequence-free — on social media. Insults, threats, celebrations of misfortune... they fill timelines daily. And for those making such comments, there's often an assumption of safety: if you're attacking someone already unpopular in your own circle, your side will shield you.
So, when Kirk was murdered, many expected the same rules to apply. Say what you want, pile on the hate, and wait for the next story to distract everyone.
But this time, the script flipped.
What happened instead was public backlash. Not just from Kirk’s supporters, but from average people — some of whom may have disagreed with him politically — who recognized that something had gone too far. That laughing at a man’s murder isn’t just in poor taste — it’s inhumane.
Why the shift? A few reasons stand out:
Those who mocked Kirk’s death weren’t just expressing political opinions — they were displaying something darker. And in doing so, they overplayed their hand.
They forgot that speech may be free, but it's not free of consequence.
They forgot that celebrating a killing says more about the speaker than the victim.
They forgot that while ideology may divide us, decency is supposed to bind us.
This moment — as unexpected as it was — may signal a cultural turning point. Perhaps people are tired of the endless outrage, the gleeful cruelty, the “owning” of the other side. Perhaps there’s still a moral line that, when crossed, brings real consequences.
Or maybe it’s just a pause — a moment of discomfort before the internet moves on.
Time will tell. But for now, the reaction to Charlie Kirk’s death — and more importantly, to those who mocked it — stands as a reminder: cruelty isn’t courage, and sometimes the crowd does push back.
I can tell you, the Left just lost any chance of flipping the House in 2026. Every Republican candidate will in every debate as their opponent to unequivocally without any qualifiers...”Do you reject political violence”. The leftists on the stage will have their “Have you stopped beating your wife” question. Be against barbarity and the left will target you, double down on stupid and well you lose.
Amen.
Well, a loss of civility for sure, but the actual war will be between the destroyers of civilization and those of us fighting to defend and restore it.
Nice analysis! Keep em coming!
Undeniably true. The front line was where Charlie Kirk chose to focus -- college campuses. And there you will see a large minority of students that get physically and emotionally agitated when you bring up religion (Christianity in particular). I honestly don't know the answer except to keep pressing.
+1
The callousness is increasing exponentially.
It’s horrific how fast it has all deteriorated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.