Sick!
My Body, My Choice.
What happened to that????????????..................
Bad karma on the part of the poofters. Their day of reconning will come. Prayers for the murdered baby.
A couple of self-centered fags. Who would have guessed?
Hold on a minute. So a man can demand that a pregnant woman have an abortion, and if she goes through with the pregnancy he can sue her? I think this is some kind of gay man privilege. No other man can do that. She should’ve flipped him the finger. But this is the beginning of the moral compromises she made when she was agreeing to do this for two men.
she was going to give her baby to 2 degenerates so Brittany can pound sand.
Not reported in article: Where was this newborn Baby Boy for those few days he lived? Did he remain in the hospital, or did this pair take custody, take him home, and just run out the clock until the Baby died?
If he stayed in the hospital, I’m guessing all Well Babies are allowed to stay inpatient for a set number of days. If inpatient, the hospital will have to account for what was/ was not done for the child during his short life. I’ve never been a Dad, don’t know the process first hand, so I may be missing certain obvious factors.
“”feeling like “a rented-out uterus.””
Ya think?
why would she comply??????? God, these people make me sick
She should have gone out of state to have the baby and stop all communication with the two losers.
Brittany’s first mistake was .... well, we all know.
God rest and hold this sweet, innocent soul.
Surrogacy is a great wrong. But the circumstances could very well have been the same if the couple who hired the woman were a man and woman or even if the baby was the natural child of a couple.
That is because the two men were the legal parents of the baby and therefore had the right to make medical decisions for the baby. That right also means declining extraordinary treatment/measures when there is very little chance the child will survive.
There is no law or even ethical guideline that mandates a terminal patient be kept alive by any and all means necessary. Palliative care is often an option offered (and that may be required by law) in cases of extreme premature birth. Just leaving a premature baby to die without any sort of “care” is not the same as palliative care. But the fact the baby is likely not going to survive means the parents or even the doctors can’t be compelled to provide extraordinary and often futile measures to prolong life.
There are even cases where a parent’s wishes for such care are overridden by hospital “so called ethics” boards. Even when the futility of such measures is not clear. Hello Texas.
Anyway this did not happen because the couple which hired the woman were homosexuals. Surrogacy is wrong because it treats children as a commodity (well that is one reason). The medical and legal ethics/law in this case though pretty much line up with non-surrogate births of very premature babies.
Ummmm, that's cause that's all you were to these evil monsters.
It's one thing to surrogate for a woman who CAN'T carry to term for some reason, but to be used to produce a commodity for a gay couple, is not the same thing.
There is no such thing as surrogate mother. Either you’re a mother or you’re not. Becoming a mother and promising to give up the baby is an abomination.
Not buying the story..you can’t be made to terminate a baby. The mother makes the choice. If she chose to do then it’s on her.
The men were happy killing the child because it was just a “prop” for their cosplay.
The baby was fine
The surrogate mother had breast cancer and needed to deliver early in order to receive treatment which might have harmed the unborn baby
This story makes me sick at heart
What happened to my body my choice?
