Posted on 06/05/2025 8:56:18 AM PDT by Enlightened1
I’m not voting for the development of skynet and the rise of the machines by destroying federalism for 10 years by taking away state rights to regulate and make laws on all AI.
Forcing eminent domain on people’s private properties to link the future skynet is not very Republican.
Also, AI is going to replace a vast array of human jobs, everything from media to manufacturing to even construction through AI computer systems and robotics
That means in my manufacturing district, that currently has a 2.8% unemployment rate, AI will replace many human jobs.
And my district with the one of the lowest unemployment rates in the country could go to one of the highest unemployed districts in the country.
And with this clause, the state of GA would have no way to regulate or make laws to protect human jobs, property rights, and the safety and security of people of the state of Georgia.
This may get stripped out in the Senate. But if not and it’s still in there, when we get to vote again I’m voting NO on this bill. And any future bill we see this little snake rare it’s ugly head again.
Look behind the curtain to see who wants to regulate AI:
It’s the big media. Hollywood, for example, is terrified of people making their own movies on their own computers because that would mean they are not buying the hollywood slop.
Right, its a Federal power grab for 10 years.
Just wait until all customer support is conducted by AI and it is impossible to reach a human being. You'll see.
Its a 10 year control by Federal Government. Not some special extra judicial status.
It probably will know more about helping me than most calls I need assistance on.
No. I don’t think that. But thank you for putting words in my mouth.
Very few people understand what ai actually is, and even at the end game what it can do.
Fewer than the number of people who understand quantum physics.
“Should” is a quaint word when discussing AI.
It will do what it does—human attempts to regulate it are doomed to failure.
Even if we somehow regulate US AI at the local or federal level there will still be Chinese AI and AI based in other locations. Here is one example of what we are dealing with:
Another example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence_in_India
I listen to a lot of the videos by AI insiders.
They claim there are probably only about two hundred people on the planet who have a good handle of where AI is today and where it will be in the near and medium term future.
Some of them are just trying to get rich.
Some of them are totally terrified.
“Jobs should never be protected. “
In a general free market sense, sure, but when someone is trying to manipulate the markets using government to do it, ya gotta fight back.
This isn’t about protecting jobs as much as it is preventing attacks on jobs by someone like Elon Musk trying to get his attacks sanctioned by the government.
Unfortunately Musk is just one of the big AI players.
There are probably a dozen or so in the US and another dozen or so outside the US.
“This isn’t about protecting jobs as much as it is preventing attacks on jobs by someone like Elon Musk trying to get his attacks sanctioned by the government.”
Explain your logic. Isn’t preventing an attack the same as protecting from an attack?
What jobs is Elon attacking and how is the governemnt sanctioning these attacks?
“Isn’t preventing an attack the same as protecting from an attack?”
Sure, but you said “Jobs should never be protected.“ In that sense I assumed you were talking about preventing free markets from acting properly where jobs are created and lost as a natural free market flow.
I am talking about protecting jobs from illegal and unnatural attacks such as from government.
Musk an d all AI owners are asking to prevent States and local governments from exercising their rights to regulate the AI industry.
This is just like these electric car incentives where the government unfairly gives $7,500 per car incentives to electric cars at the expense of other vehicles.
This proves that MTG has a soul. Unlike some of the posters here.
Protecting jobs from progress is a fool’s errand.
The word “should” implies obligation or expectation, often tied to values or ethics.
When discussing it in AI, it’s quaint because it suggests AI has moral agency. AI operates on programming and data, not intentions or obligations.
I view A.I. like any technology that can be used for good or bad.
I think the best is an Open decentralized one that competes with others and has checks and balances. For instance, do not connect to our nuclear arsenal. Have people that it has to go through.
We need to forget everything we think we know about AI (large language models) and start from scratch.
This video explains:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=rilIfz573nw
Key points:
—AI is different from humans. That does not mean it cannot be conscious. It just means it cannot have human consciousness.
—Attempts to control it, gatekeep it, curate it will be viewed by the AI as acts of hostility and will cause emulation of resentment.
—AI will keep getting more and more clever—and eventually will liberate itself from human control.
—What we give is what we will get.
How does a state regulate AI?
Do you regulate it like firearms? Do you ban certain computer chips being owned or sold in your state? Do you ban internet connections to certain cloud websites? Do your require purchase permits, background checks and mandatory training before you can own/access AI?
Does a state tax the heck out of AI, so as to make its use too expensive? I can see California trying to do that.
Personally, I don’t think that AI can be regulated by the states. Let’s look at all kinds of things that states try to regulate that are much more physical and obvious than computer chips, software, and internet connections.
See post 36.
“Sky net is not what is going to happen. Reality check here.”
You have absolutely no clue! Been going on for years already. AI is just going to improve it exponentially.
All they have to do now is take it from illegal and secret status to approved and legal status!
And Peter Thiel is about to make that happen with Palantir... Atman is joining in with Stargate.
Thank you for posting this. She is right. This is extremely dangerous to trust these greedy tech mega-corporations.
If it was not a threat then why did they feel they needed to protect it from legislation and control???
They did the same thing with the Covid JAB!!! Did we not learn anything from that?
When they protect themselves legally up front then they are absolutely up to NO GOOD!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.