Heading into the 2020 and 2024 elections, is it possible “Dr. Jill” nixed the PSA tests, figuring that what the family didn’t know didn’t have to be disclosed—and thus couldn’t prevent Joe from running?
Ping to Liberal Media Criticism list.
He might have been low-stage and the vaxx turbo-cancered him
(nod to William Goldman)
Notice the timing.
It's a limited hangout of sorts. It reminds me of the Lewinsky BJ attention that covered up more serious Clinton behavior.
Perfectly timed distractions from the Martin investigation of the auto-pen tsunami of pardons AND from the FDA approval of the first NON mRNA (aka, true and traditional) COVID vaccine.
My theory is that Joe thoroughly trashed his immune system with “boo$ter$”...junk experimental trials which have unleashed a plethora of aggressive cancers.
And if so, a very fitting recompense for those whose careers were ended and, especially, those whose lives were shortened due to BIDEN’s mRNA “vaccine” mandates!
Is it possible that even Biden didn’t know he had cancer?
Here’s what’s troubling. Biden stole the election. Everyone knew it. He proceeded to screw up our country in every way possible.
A very very high percentage of 78 year old men have prostate cancer
Stop with the pearl clutching ya ninny
What is more troubling is that Mourning, Moaning, Morning Joe and his merry band of idiots are still on the air.
Now can add “hypocrite” to the title of (the other) “Traitor Joe”...now an official pure blood ‘rat.
Morning Joe is troubled there may have been a cover-up involving Whitehouse Joe.
Too disgusting to be funny.
Now comes the excuses. The out and out lying.
They are all culpable. They purposely put this nation at risk for greed and power.
Plain and simple.
Psychological investigations need to be carried out to determine the level of criminal charges. That means all levels of government AND, news organizations.
And that also includes investigating the SCOTUS.
all part of a plot to get Biden reelect and then have the resign and give presidency to Kamala without her haveing to be elected.
If so, then do we need to force anyone running for President or Vice President to sign a waiver giving their consent?
I believe that there were plenty of people who knew darn well that Biden did not have what it took to handle the requirements needed to effectively carry out the responsibilities of the Presidency, and none said a thing.
Try them all, is my suggestion.
Understand legally a doctor cannot release ANYTHING publicly without a patients permission. However to claim he’s in perfect health when you know he’s not is a lie... you can quietly just say I am not allowed to discuss a patients medical condition.
There is no doubt these people lied, this is just another lie to add to the list
Only “very troubling”? No further consequences for lying? Why would the media/health car professionals, etc., not lie again?
Why, withholding biden’s health info from the public, or lying about it, is just not acceptable. Start your recorders because Joe is about to say the truth.
What a hypocritical crock he is.
Oh come on now Joe, you LOVE being lied to by democrats. In fact, you fully support and parrot every lie coming from the democrat/communist party. So just knock off the clutching at pearls act you phony.
Quite surprising that with all this discussion about Brib’em and prostate cancer, there has been much said about PSA testing without the discussion about the validity of this test..... even though there has been significant discussion about it that goes back to 1986 and particularly the last 20 years.
There have been many articles posted here on FR over the years that have to do with prostate cancer and PSA…. Once again, I want to remind folks about some history worth noting. If you take the time to read the links below, remember…don’t bother to argue with me about any of this. If you want to argue, go argue with the findings of Dr. Thomas Stamey who was the Chief of Urology at Stanford University who developed the PSA blood test. It’s not possible to argue with Dr. Stamey himself… he passed away in 2015.
In 1987, Dr. Stamey and colleagues published findings that showed that serum PSA level was a marker for prostate cancer. Very quickly, PSA testing became a common test for men just about everywhere. However, by 2004 and after more research, Dr. Stamey published new findings that declared that the PSA results were not related to prostate cancer…. High readings were related to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) which is a medical condition defined as the histologic proliferation of epithelial and stromal cells as well as smooth muscle in the prostate. In other words, an enlargement of the prostrate that causes constriction of the urethra and prevents emptying of the bladder.
In 2011, Dr. Stamey said this… “When the final chapter of this disease is written, it will prove that never in the history of oncology will so many men have been so over-treated for one disease.” https://pcri.org/news/2017/1/20/to-be-or-not-to-be-biopsiedthat-is-the-question
Other links…
https://americansurgical.org/transactions/Fellows/Memoirs/ThomasAStamey.cgi A short obituary of Dr. Stamey
https://www.mayoclinic.org/documents/mc5700-0212-pdf/doc-20079186 A critical review of the value of PSA screening in 2012….
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/prostate-hypertrophy An overview of prostate diseases (2016)….
https://www.canceractive.com/article/stanford-professor-dubs-psa-test—almost-useless 2005….. And here is a similar position by the Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases organization in 2004 https://www.nature.com/articles/4500777.pdf under this editorial heading “Is the PSA test useless?”
https://www.cancernetwork.com/view/psa-below-9-ngml-triggers-unnecessary-biopsies Dr. Stamey in 2002 raising the red flag on overprescribing biopsies… more about the question of getting a biopsy here…. https://pcri.org/news/2017/1/20/to-be-or-not-to-be-biopsiedthat-is-the-question
Dr. Zeke sez Pedo Pete is way past his expiration date, no?