“ I am an epidemiologist whose strength is my breadth of experience. I have worked in a number of areas, including infectious diseases, foodborne disease, nutrition, child health, asthma and Indigenous Health.
One of my specialist areas is applied epidemiology, with a focus on the investigation and response to outbreaks and epidemics of disease.
In addition to my work in Australia, I have extensive experience working in the Asia Pacific region, having worked in Fiji, Papua New Guinea and Cambodia in capacity building and responding to health emergencies.
I also have considerable expertise in science and health communication, with a particular interest in risk communication.”
Its all sematics about the words he used.
The MMR vaccine does not contain fetal tissue or fetal debris from abortions. The rubella component of the vaccine is produced using a human cell line derived from a fetus aborted in the 1960s, but no fetal tissue or cells from the original abortion are present in the final vaccine. The cell line used continues to replicate independently, and no further sources of fetal cells are needed for vaccine production.
So the vaccine still has parts derived and using an aborted fetus cell line. If he said this speciically there would be no semantic denials.
I’m immediately suspicious of anyone who uses phrases like “here’s the science”, “trust the science”, etc.
It arrogantly implies that they know everything, and anyone who disagrees in the least is an idiot.
I don’t care whether it’s present in the vaccine. It’s development depended on killing a human being, no less than the lampshades Nazi’s made from human skin. A human being was killed and used to create a product, and I don’t care how useful that product is!
He states it is “false” that the vaccine contains “fetal debris” but then admits it has fetal DNA. So this appears to be a lie.
The he says the fact of the DNA being present doesn’t pose a health risk, but, that wasn’t the objection. So this is a straw man argument.
King James Bible
And the chief priests took the silver pieces, and said, It is not lawful for to put them into the treasury, because it is the price of blood.
https://biblehub.com/matthew/27-6.htm
King James Bible
Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?
https://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/3-16.htm
Some people don’t want to contaminate themselves with the sin of abortion even if there is no cell or molecule of the murdered baby in the vaccine.
I don’t give a crap what’s in them. I don’t want it ever.
A feral cell cloned into a culture is still originating as from a fetus.
Checking out their website. They are a bunch of Liberals. not to be trusted.
Use the data learned from mengele torture experiments with jews. Might help us.
Use the data from cia lsd experiments and syphilis experiments on blacks.
Watch Deep Throat though we know what the woman involved went through that was not consenting.
Use child porn, enjoy yourself, make more copies...that is whst the MMR and covid vaccines are doing.
Patents kill their own kids in this country, proudly. How would we expect better. How would God not punish us for this.
“which was originally derived from lung tissue of a single elective abortion in the 1960s.” OH ok, so it’s cool only one human baby slaughtered to make a vaccine.
WIKI
WI-38 is a diploid human cell line composed of fibroblasts derived from lung tissue of a 3-month-gestation female fetus. The fetus came from the elective abortion of a Swedish woman in 1963.
In the early 1960s, Hayflick and his colleague Paul Moorhead at the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania discovered that when normal human cells were stored in a freezer, the cells remembered the doubling level at which they were stored and, when reconstituted, began to divide from that level to roughly 50 total doublings (for cells derived from fetal tissue).
Hayflick’s discovery later contributed to the determination of the biological roles of telomeres. Hayflick claimed that the finite capacity of normal human cells to replicate was an expression of aging or senescence at the cellular level.
Hayflick also discovered that if cells were properly stored in a freezer, cells would remain viable and that an enormous number of cells could be produced from a single starting culture. One of the cell strains that Hayflick isolated, which he named WI-38, was found to be free of contaminating viruses, unlike the primary monkey kidney cells then in use for virus vaccine production. In addition, WI-38 cells could be frozen, then thawed and exhaustively tested. These advantages led to WI-38 quickly replacing primary monkey kidney cells for human virus vaccine production.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WI-38
In the beginning of the 18th century, abortion in Sweden was by practice punished by death. The death penalty was formally included in the criminal law of 1734. The law stated that a woman who drives out her foetus and the one who advises or helps are sentenced to death.
More than one hundred years later, a less severe attitude came into being. In the criminal law of 1864, the death penalty was abandoned. Still severe, the punishment was as high as six years of hard labor.
In a new law of 1921, the penalty was reduced, this time to a maximum of six months in prison.
The first law to allow abortion under certain circumstances was taken by the Swedish Parliament (Riksdagen) in 1938 and was, with a few amendments, in force during the 36 years from 1939 to 1974.
In the beginning, four medical conditions for sanction of abortion were available. These were sickness, weakness, humanitarian, and eugenic. In 1946, expected weakness was added and, in 1963, fetal damage. The conditions are formulated in the law as follows:
• Sickness: Abortion is allowed when, because of the woman’s sickness, or physical defect, the delivery of the child would involve a serious danger to her life or health;
• Weakness: Abortion is allowed when, because of the woman’s weakness, the delivery of the child would involve a serious danger to her life or health;
• Expected weakness: Abortion is allowed when, regarding the woman’s situation of living and other circumstances, it could be assumed that her bodily or mental force could seriously deteriorate by the delivery and rearing of the child;
• Humanitarian: Abortion is allowed when the pregnancy is the result of a criminal act like rape, sexual abuse, or sexual intercourse with a close relative;
• Eugenic: Abortion is allowed when it can reasonably be assumed, that the mother or the father would transfer a hereditary disposition of mental disorder, or grave disease, or severe defect of another kind to the child. Abortion according to this condition could only be granted by
MED/SOS and was not allowed, unless the woman was also sterilized;
• Risk of fetal damage: Abortion is allowed when there is reason to fear that the expected child would suffer a severe sickness or handicap because of a damage incurred in the fetal stage.
It should be noted that abortion purely on the basis of social needs like poverty, lack of housing, or unemployment, was not included in the law.
An example of differences in attitudes among the physicians is given by the 1952 Annual Meeting of the Swedish Medical Association, which among other things took up the abortion issue. The chairman ranked abortion in the same category as child murder. He and several physicians also wanted to exclude expected weakness from the law.
in 1966 in Linköping, 56% of the abortions were prescribed due to sickness and 15% due to weakness. In the city of Gävle, 5% of abortions were prescribed due to sickness and 70% due to weakness.
Finkbine was from Arizona (born in 1933) and a television actress known as Miss Cherri. She came to Sweden in August 1962 to apply for an abortion. She was then pregnant with her fifth child and had taken the sedative Thalidomide.
The physicians recommended her to try either Japan or Sweden for abortion. She attempted to go to Japan, but was denied a visa by the Japanese consul. Then, she and her husband went to Sweden. She applied for an abortion at Karolinska Hospital in Stockholm where she received treatment.
In 1963, the risk of fetal damage was explicitly added to the law. This was very likely a result of Finkbine’s visit to Sweden.
When Finkbine was granted an abortion, the news dominated the front pages of newspapers all over Europe.
https://www.su.se/polopoly_fs/1.18721.1320939636!/WP_2009_1.pdf
“Here’s the science”
____________________________________________
I lol’d when I read that.
Living cells are derived from live birthed babies whose organs are harvested. Aborted fetal tissue has never been used for anything
the significant point isn’t whether or not the dna came from an aborted fetus or donor dna... it’s the fact that an identifiable piece of dna is now graphed onto the dna of all those people who received the jab.
that dna signature can now be targeted by a virus whose payload could be anything
And the COVID vax is "safe and effective".
“Here’s the science”.
Right there is cause not to believe a word of it. Thanks to glowbull warming and covid my respect for science is very limited.
Given a choice of believing RFK Jr or “the science”, I am comfortable in believing RFK Jr.