Posted on 01/04/2025 6:19:47 AM PST by george76
The only other option would be that he is still alive, and that his rented Tesla Cybertruck was driven to the Trump hotel remotely, and the corpse in the vehicle is not him. Which would lower the likelihood of his claims being legitimate.
I think we need to look into everything. I neither accept or reject his claims. But what I am saying is that we cannot afford to jump to rapid conclusions in either direction. 🙂👍.
A patsy. Who was PSYOP trained at Fr. Bragg.
Just like Shamsud-Din Jabbar.
And why was that reporter gal contaminating everything in the house and why wasn’t the door repaired and locked by LE, the landlord, his family or friends?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Correct me if I’m wrong but aren’t you mixing up the NOLA and Vegas events?
That’s been my question, why the need for the baby’s DNA when they have his on record and his toothbrush, comb, coffee cup, his entire house to get it. So, they’re lying. If the body doesn’t match his DNA, then we have another problem.
If the wife left him, she sure eliminated every little piece of a female and baby ever having been in the house. It looked like a bachelor’s house. Guessing you saw the video of the house being wide open begging for that reporter and a million other folks to contaminate it. If she was mad at him, why were they texting about the cyber truck and how cool it was? What explanation did he give her why he rented it? What was his explanation of the bomb building?
Benny Johnson has an interesting short show yesterday putting out the similarities between this guy, the NOLA guy, and wannabe assassin Routh.
The first two has Fort Bragg in common.
Also Routh has visited Fort Bragg 147 times, sometimes overnight. Who authorized his visits? Who authorized his overnight stays? I wonder if that has been scrubbed yet?
It appears there’s some major treasonous activity being organized at that facility.
Yes, it was not a bomb, it was a fireworks display. Literally. The sole intent was to make a big scene, but not to do severe damage.
He sent a picture of the cybertruck to a girlfriend or ex-girlfriend with the words, “I feel like Batman or Halo.” That makes the theories a little harder to believe. They aren’t impossible or impossible to believe, but possibly he was just a guy who wanted to go out with a bang.
Who said the balloons were Chinese? Sure, we let at least two enemy balloons fly from one coast to the other and never lifted a finger. That’s a bit hard to swallow. Glad the Chinese took Thanksgiving off and followed FAA rules with the drones. Claiming they are Chinese is an excuse to start WWIII.
I’d say creating this Disease X is enough reason.
Looks that way to me, too.
Yes, there’s too much to process and too many inconsistencies for anybody to be comfortable with any explanation of what really happened.
Fort Bragg.
“Claiming they are Chinese is an excuse to start WWIII.”
Lol.
If the claims are true this has been going on for months if not years—important but hardly urgent.
Bkmk
He (if it was him) wrote out that long email but couldn’t include a short paragraph on specifically what his mysterious message to Trump and Elon was and why he was going to blow up a perfectly good car. Not a serious warning that leaves everyone scratching their heads.
Sure, don’t you always bring along your military ID and passport to show the Mexican cartel.
I haven’t seen any video. I’ve been working and it’s hard for me to see anything on youtube. We don’t have cable and I couldn’t stomach any of the “news” even if we had it. So I’m just getting bits and pieces here on FR. And what I’ve seen references “interviews” but doesn’t say who the interviews were with. Have they interviewed the wife? Where are they getting this information?
To be truthful, I’m beginning to understand agnostics because when there’s no way to verify claims and no way to know who can be trusted every claim results in “Meh. Maybe true, maybe not. Who knows?”
It’s a very, very yucky place to be in.
Past experience is pretty valid on making presumptions about similar events. “Problematic data” is, many times, insufficient or inaccurate data, presented as fact with no other backing than ‘I said so’.
Blowing yourself up in a rented cybertruck with fireworks isn’t a “common sense” thing to do. So, on it’s face, it looks like something a kookamook would do. I think I’ll be safe sticking with that until REAL FACTS are more widely known that show anything otherwise.
“there’s no way to verify claims and no way to know who can be trusted”
That discomfort you are feeling is the early stages of wisdom.
It means you have to work harder to figure out what is true.
That is a much better place to be in than believing whatever authority figures tell you.
Thanks. That’s what I meant; didn’t even realize I put the wrong thing. Thanks for the correction.
Yep, the best way to destroy a hotel is to park outside with a vehicle that’ll contain a small blast. Someone didn’t remember Oklahoma City. Or this was all theater.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.