Posted on 11/25/2024 8:08:23 AM PST by coloradan
Soon after the 2020 election I saw, but didn't save a copy of, an article that argued that some precincts in battleground states showed evidence of fraud because when the data for how many ballots voted for Biden vs how many voted for other down-ballot candidates, you should expect to see circular or oval blobs, expressing some randomness in the data, but instead these precincts showed crescent-shaped blobs with cusps at the ends, which looked very unnatural, as if the voting numbers had been tampered with.
I have searched high and low for this article but am unable to find it.
Can anyone point me to it, or could send me a copy if they saved it?
I wouldn't be surprised if Google ddid and is still doing its very best to eradicate that article.
All such articles have been purged from the internet and sent down the MEMORY HOLE................
The net has gotten very good at hiding what it doesn’t want you to see. I ask for things and get pages of the opposite of what I asked to see. Keep rewording your search parameters.
Are you actually suggesting 2020 was fraudulent?...../s.
MSM does a good job of erasing/discouraging of examination of blatantly obvious data that (correctly) imply shenanigans.
One of the clips I saw part of the leftist MSM regime accidentally showed was the total number of votes in presidential elections.. It had like the last 5 races.....all of the Democrat voter totals were near each other in the 60s-70s range, IIRC. Then along comes Biden and it was up significantly more than 5 million+, then back down this election.
maybe it’s in here somewhere, election2020 keyword with topics posted in 2020-2021:
https://freerepublic.com/tag/election2020/index?more=15117693
sidebar:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4274109/posts
Time to move on. Make Colorado Red.
Agreed.
I look at 2020 election fraud this way; since Republican leadership isn’t concerned, why should I get upset?
https://rumble.com/vcnila-jovan-pulitzer-georgia-senate-ballot-fraud-detection.html
3 years ago
Jovan Pulitzer Georgia Senate ballot fraud detection testimony Dec 30, 2020 election voter
At 4:59
Voice Typed:
we would be able to tell if they were folded, if they were counterfeit, whether they were filled out by human hand, whether we printed by a machine, whether they were batch fed continually over and over. We can detect every bit of that.
End of voice type
(I don’t know where this came from)
Jovan Hutton Pulitzer is an inventor and forensics expert. He said that the paper mail-in ballots were the legal property of the people, and that the people had a legal right to examine them.
Pulitzer said that he had a machine that could examine all of the paper mail-in ballots very quickly to look for the following things:
* If the paper mail in ballots don’t have fold marks, it means they were never sent through the mail, which means they are illegal.
* At a microscopic level, the mark in each filled-in box should be unique. If there are identical marks, it means they were filled in by the same person, using a stamping device or a machine.
* Even if they were filled in by hand, if large numbers of consecutive ballots all have the same kind of ink, it means they were filled in by the same person, using the same pen.
The government committee voted to allow Pulitzer to examine these ballots.
But very soon afterward, trucks came by, picked up the ballots, and took them to a shredding facility, which used military grade shredding machines to grind them into a fine powder, so they can never be reconstructed.
Why did they destroy the ballots before they could be examined?
What are they afraid of?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.