Posted on 10/20/2024 6:37:08 PM PDT by bitt
The CBS “news” organization has finally broken its silence on its fraudulent interview with Kamala Harris, where they cut and replaced her statements in response to a question.
Without providing evidence, CBS claims that the response they edited into the interview was the same but “a different portion of the response.” The statement continues, “The portion of her answer on 60 Minutes was more succinct, which allows time for other subjects in a wide-ranging 21-minute-long segment.”
This comes after CBS’s’ 60 Minutes’ was exposed for cutting Kamala’s nonsensical answer to a question and replacing it with a completely separate sentence she said earlier in the interview. This was fraud and election interference.
WATCH:
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Fake but accurate all over again
Broken firemain- everything (the evidence) has been ruined - sorry
Yep, I was just thinking “20 years since Ratbergate.”
Or Rathergate, even.
BULLSH!T!
Election interference 1000% here
They salty? Have some fries with your salt SeeBS
Freepers Buckhead and TankerKC are the ones that nailed the fraud about Bush. It cost Dan Rather his job.
“more succinct” = changed, edited, screwed with...
The best defense is a strong offense. They are guilty as can be.
Then—if absolutely need be—there’ll be the recorded and transcribed evidence under NSA control from that producer’s phone, the one with the open mic, against which to compare.
It’s See BS.
An oldie but goodie from Rathergate. Hat tip to Incpen, who created this late September 2004, according to the Internet Archive.
Ironic how this is appropriate on the 20th anniversary of Rathergate and CBS trying to rehabilitate it's and Rather's image over it. We know no one will get fired at CBS for editing the Harris interview like it was a fictional TV show.
Rather's real sin was not getting caught. It was not getting permission first.
Brazen dogs!
See BS.
Liberal logic on display and you wonder how libs get into office!
They gave an illegal political contribution-in-kind. The editor, the producer and the executives at CBS all need to be charged for it.
good one D
I recall somebody with “pajamas” in their username pointing out that the article was obviously printed with a Microsoft font that did not exist at that time when typewriters were the only tools available.
? buckhead ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.