Posted on 09/17/2024 8:26:53 PM PDT by Red Badger
It was rigged.
In a face-to-face, Megyn Kelly would take this David Muir’s manparts like a Sioux warrior on a Seventh Cavalry trooper...
Receiving questions and subjects that were off limits for one candidate but were he other having everything fair game should be considered election interference.
Yawn- DemoRats cheat and lie. It’s what they do best.
Western Lensman
@WesternLensman
https://x.com/WesternLensman/status/1833869730735603919
This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators’ direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.
There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.
This is not “bias.”
It’s much worse.
This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers” the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information.
When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is.
The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed.
In this clip:
1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer” he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange.
2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check.
3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.
4) Kamala says that “some” police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check.
5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.
6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check.
7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath” hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.
To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:
“They did exactly what their bosses wanted.”
“Absolutely not. Harris was not given any questions before the date.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well, sure... whatever. It’s just a technicality and how the question is phrased. ABC didn’t have to give them any questions in advance..... Did the Coup-malala provide the questions that they wanted asked of them? Did they suggest the order they wanted the questions asked in? Did they say what subjects were off limits?
Where is this panic button?
Next to hillary’s reset button?
But hey, you people (not FReepers) just keep believing Heels Up won the debate...
Clearly weighted in favor of pantyhose... How can they even try to deny that?
ABC news is nothing short of biased, partisan political propaganda. This comes very close to election interference and in-kind campaign donations. In my opinion it’s illegal.
It's what they HAVE to do in order to trick voters into supporting them. Democrats have become the mouthpiece and beneficiaries of BIG GOVT.
>> In a face-to-face, Megyn Kelly would take this David Muir’s manparts like a Sioux warrior on a Seventh Cavalry trooper...
ROFLMAO. That one’s a keeper!
MeAgain has really changed (for the better) since ~2016.
Muir, on the other hand, is still the same lying homo POS he always was.
Now, that would be Must See TV!!
I’m no lawyer and didn’t stay at a Holiday Inn last night, so I’m asking. How is an affidavit “punishable by perjury” if it’s not submitted to a court?
And I’m. o English Major either, but how is something punishable by perjury? That doesn’t make sense. It could be punishable FOR perjury.
I believe it was filed with a court in NYC.
an dyes it should be ‘for’.............
> As WND reported Sunday, Sept. 15, an ABC News whistleblower released an affidavit punishable by perjury… <
WND is being overly dramatic there. Every picture of the affidavit that I saw has the whistleblower’s name redacted and the notary’s name redacted.
So we don’t know if the document was even properly notarized in the first place. No notary’s name = no possibility of perjury. It’s not much different than me autonomously scribbling an accusation on a scrap of paper.
The document could be the real deal. If so, the whistleblower needs to quit delaying and put all his cards on the table. Like immediately. Strike while the iron is hot.
Or the document could be a prank put out by some clever high school student. Or it could be weird disinformation put out by who knows who.
Three possibilities, as I see it. And that bothers me. The ABC collusion was very obvious. And here we are, focusing all our energy on a big question mark.
I can only hope that Trump is doing some serious investigation behind the scenes.
Election interference is exactly what this is. Muir and Davis worked to take away the right of American citizens to give their informed consent on how they are to be governed. Their extremely unfair, dishonest actions make a mockery of the idea this even was a presidential debate and not just propaganda and manipulation on behalf of their own party. And the Muir, who thew away all claim to being a journalist, has the nerve to say, “The most important thing to remember is you all have the power.” What a way to spit in the face of the American people.
Everyone, don’t forget to boycott ABC (not just the “news”) and all aspects of Disney and to tell others to do the same.
“ Anonymously scribbling”, not “autonomously scribbling” in my post #17.
Autocorrect strikes again.
Heck, I’m not even sure what autonomously scribbling means.
The bottom of The Beast With Two Backs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.