It was rigged.
In a face-to-face, Megyn Kelly would take this David Muir’s manparts like a Sioux warrior on a Seventh Cavalry trooper...
Receiving questions and subjects that were off limits for one candidate but were he other having everything fair game should be considered election interference.
Yawn- DemoRats cheat and lie. It’s what they do best.
“Absolutely not. Harris was not given any questions before the date.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well, sure... whatever. It’s just a technicality and how the question is phrased. ABC didn’t have to give them any questions in advance..... Did the Coup-malala provide the questions that they wanted asked of them? Did they suggest the order they wanted the questions asked in? Did they say what subjects were off limits?
Where is this panic button?
Next to hillary’s reset button?
But hey, you people (not FReepers) just keep believing Heels Up won the debate...
Clearly weighted in favor of pantyhose... How can they even try to deny that?
ABC news is nothing short of biased, partisan political propaganda. This comes very close to election interference and in-kind campaign donations. In my opinion it’s illegal.
I’m no lawyer and didn’t stay at a Holiday Inn last night, so I’m asking. How is an affidavit “punishable by perjury” if it’s not submitted to a court?
And I’m. o English Major either, but how is something punishable by perjury? That doesn’t make sense. It could be punishable FOR perjury.
> As WND reported Sunday, Sept. 15, an ABC News whistleblower released an affidavit punishable by perjury… <
WND is being overly dramatic there. Every picture of the affidavit that I saw has the whistleblower’s name redacted and the notary’s name redacted.
So we don’t know if the document was even properly notarized in the first place. No notary’s name = no possibility of perjury. It’s not much different than me autonomously scribbling an accusation on a scrap of paper.
The document could be the real deal. If so, the whistleblower needs to quit delaying and put all his cards on the table. Like immediately. Strike while the iron is hot.
Or the document could be a prank put out by some clever high school student. Or it could be weird disinformation put out by who knows who.
Three possibilities, as I see it. And that bothers me. The ABC collusion was very obvious. And here we are, focusing all our energy on a big question mark.
I can only hope that Trump is doing some serious investigation behind the scenes.
abc cheated
harris cheated
when will the fcc and fec investigations begin?
Trump voters knew the fix was in. Moronic Harris voters won’t care.
I say again, Trump could have brought up any of those topics that ABC didn’t bring up.
But ABC’s reasoning was that DJT is a liar but Harris never lies. So only DJT should be fact checked.
Next question.
Give us the sample questions so we can compare to actual debate questions.
No topics or questions will be shared in advance with campaigns or candidates.”
They dig their hole deeper.
They confessed.
Yep, it was rigged. Trump should have never agreed to a debate on ABC news. It was a set up from the beginning.