Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Receiving questions and subjects that were off limits for one candidate but were he other having everything fair game should be considered election interference.


4 posted on 09/17/2024 8:41:24 PM PDT by LibertyOh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LibertyOh

Western Lensman

@WesternLensman

https://x.com/WesternLensman/status/1833869730735603919

This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators’ direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.

There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.

This is not “bias.”

It’s much worse.

This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers” the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information.

When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is.

The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed.

In this clip:

1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer” he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange.

2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check.

3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.

4) Kamala says that “some” police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check.

5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.

6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check.

7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath” hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.

To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:

“They did exactly what their bosses wanted.”


6 posted on 09/17/2024 8:52:47 PM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: LibertyOh

Election interference is exactly what this is. Muir and Davis worked to take away the right of American citizens to give their informed consent on how they are to be governed. Their extremely unfair, dishonest actions make a mockery of the idea this even was a presidential debate and not just propaganda and manipulation on behalf of their own party. And the Muir, who thew away all claim to being a journalist, has the nerve to say, “The most important thing to remember is you all have the power.” What a way to spit in the face of the American people.

Everyone, don’t forget to boycott ABC (not just the “news”) and all aspects of Disney and to tell others to do the same.


18 posted on 09/17/2024 9:36:32 PM PDT by FenwickBabbitt (Volunteer at https://trumpforce47.com/ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: LibertyOh

I bet the Harris campaign wrote the questions for abc


26 posted on 09/18/2024 1:08:45 AM PDT by personalaccts (Is George W going to protect the border?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson