Posted on 09/17/2024 12:36:20 PM PDT by C210N
I tried to include more of article, but Source prevents all cut-n-paste, so go to page to see more.
(Excerpt) Read more at lawyersclubindia.com ...
C210N, you are fooled, again! Not only is Mike Pence still alive and NOT a CGI figment (as you have previously maintained), this article DOES NOT MENTION Routh on 8/30 or 9/1.
From the Internet Archive:
Click on those days, C210N. NO ROUTH MENTIONED, but YOU SAID HE WAS! Are you a Democrat plant to make everyone here LOOK STUPID?
I notice you really have problems discerning just about everything you state that I bother to look into for just one minute.
Get your freaking head out of your butt!
Ping, interesting.
Folks, this is a lie that makes us look crazy.
That fat f--- was so non-chalant about being busted, it made my antennae go right to the sky. And the interview transcript from the LEO visit, sketchy as hell, trying to put some dumb hillbilly patter over on those guys with a dose of 'I'll have a Come to Jesus with this kid'.
Still, I have skepticism regarding this thread out of India. Namely:
How does one obtain Crooks' bank records? Are they a matter of public record now?
How do we know the article was posted on August 30th? There is only a screen shot. Anybody can fake a date. I am unwilling to click links, so it would be interesting if some other Freeper (not me) would click on it and then right click to see what the metadata says as far as a posting date.
Against that - if the post stating that Crooks paid Routh does indicate an August 30th date, then one is challenged to explain how Routh's name came up.
I think determining the date of the original article, and tracking down these "bank records" would either demonstrate this is a hoax, or whether there is an actual "there" there.
If it is a hoax, then does article represent filthy russian election interference? Or a derpstate false lead to get Conservatives to clamor on to it, only for it to be easily debunked ad Conservatives thus discredited?
I'm going to have some popcorn and pour a nice dram and see how this all plays out.
No.
Routh is not mentioned in the original article. His name appears to have been *added* yesterday:
Compare with earlier versions of this article:
Wayback machine does not have anything about Routh.
You need to fix your post.
Thank you. The entire premise of this post is WRONG.
"Folks, this is a lie that makes us look crazy."
The problem and question is: yes this really was published on August 30 which then makes the inquiry become a series of why they mentioned Routh and who it was put out for.
Probably should look into whether the publishers are shell companies connected to deep state/letter agency activity.
Or Soros.
Thank you, Theo!
Routh was never mentioned. It was added and the date was not changed, then our resident genius claims he checked it and verified for us that it was all there on 8/30.
The poster lied and the article is quite different than it was originally.
I think you mean C210N needs to fix the thread.
If this Routh character has any CIA ties, the entire agency should be under a Cease & Desist order, and shut down.
This is serious subversion, and we shouldn’t be paying for it.
Understood.
But I would not discount that it is a possibility of it being some idiotic derp state comms.
They have taken to doing that.
Recall Kristol posting about the train wreck before it happened.
Kwooee bone oh? What would a foreign adversary gain from this? What would the derpstate gain from this? I'm reminded of those UFO sightings where you have several credible witnesses saying: "We saw a large rectangular object, bigger than a football field, slowly pass over without making a sound", yet the media runs with the one guy with a fake Southern accent saying: "I saw a big ol' saucer shaped like uh, uh...chicken wing, yeah, big ol' chicken wing - bone it - and uh...them aliens took me on board and I saw Elvis. He was still alive, and had a probe sticking out his ass."
I think there is much more to this attempt than the government/media complex is letting on, and you're probably right. This is the story by which they can say, "See, this is crazy talk. Anybody questioning the official narrative is just a tinfoil hat wearing nut job."
Shuts down further digging/inquiry 99% of the time.
A quick cremation solves the id problem for certain agencies?
Might be worthwhile to see if any Soros companies own the site or derp state entities.
Ah, to enjoy the wonderment of believing everything I read on the internet. To no more endure the nagging itch of critical thinking or rashy irritation of rational assessment.
Sigh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.