Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Constellation-Class Frigate: The U.S. Navy’s Next Self-Created Disaster?
National Security Journal ^ | 7/27/2024 | Robert Farley

Posted on 07/27/2024 8:27:01 AM PDT by whyilovetexas111

The Constellation-class frigate seemed like a safe bet for a service desperate for a procurement win. Wanting a frigate after the failure of the Littoral Combat Ship and the retirement of the last ships of the Oliver Hazard Perry (OHP) class, the U.S. Navy decided to hedge its bets by going with a proven design, the European Multipurpose Frigate (FREMM) proposed by Fincantieri Marine Group and operated by both France and Italy. The ‘Connies’ were supposed to be an easy win, but unfortunately, the program has strayed into the kind of trouble that seems to follow the U.S. Navy wherever it goes.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalsecurityjournal.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: defense; history; military; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
How can the Navy mess this up as well? I mean, LCS was a disaster and so was the Zumwalt-class. Maybe we should just build battleships again?
1 posted on 07/27/2024 8:27:01 AM PDT by whyilovetexas111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Great post!


2 posted on 07/27/2024 8:39:17 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Butler Police and SS had no radio comms? WTF was that anyway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

My first ship was the USS JOHN L. HALL FFG 32. We were referred to as missle sponges because we placed ourselves between the bad guys and the carrier. It was a good boat and even better crew.


3 posted on 07/27/2024 8:42:13 AM PDT by Mathews (I have faith Malachi is right!!! Any day now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Utterly deranged for the US Navy to be buying a European frigate. No


4 posted on 07/27/2024 8:42:20 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

After the Ford class, the Zumwalt class, and the idiotic LCS program, the Navy has clearly lost its ability to design good warships.


5 posted on 07/27/2024 8:45:57 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111
It makes money for somebody. Including "investors" in the US Congress and Senate.

The purpose of the US military has not been what you think it should be for a long long time under presidents from both parties.

6 posted on 07/27/2024 8:49:41 AM PDT by Salman (It's not a slippery slope if it was part of the program all along. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

The troubles of the Russian navy need to be taken into consideration.

Radical changes in ship design are necessary.


7 posted on 07/27/2024 8:51:09 AM PDT by Brian Griffin (Ask Congress to send middle class property/income tax cap amendments to the states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

We can’t even keep the Red Sea safely open.


8 posted on 07/27/2024 8:53:15 AM PDT by Brian Griffin (Ask Congress to send middle class property/income tax cap amendments to the states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

“Concurrent construction means that the Constellation herself is being built even as she is being designed...”

Start & stop change orders galore.


9 posted on 07/27/2024 8:57:38 AM PDT by citizen (Put all LBQTwhatever programming on a new subscription service: PERV-TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

The ‘Connies’ were supposed to be an easy win, but unfortunately, the program has strayed into the kind of trouble that seems to follow the U.S. Navy wherever it goes.


And the DHS’ US Coast Guard trying to build heavy Ice Breakers - they want a ship that can travel from the Arctic to the Antarctic, which means a drastic hull configuration, limiting their capabilities far below any Russian breaker. Not to mention, they have fallen years behind and cost overruns are eating them alive


10 posted on 07/27/2024 8:58:52 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Since McNamara’s cost plus contracting overhaul the primary skill set of every defense contractor has been strategic incompetence.

There is simply no incentive to succeed.


11 posted on 07/27/2024 9:05:33 AM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Cost went from $800 million to $1.3 billion and the top speed reduced to < 25 knots. Good job Navy. Who is losing their job over this?


12 posted on 07/27/2024 9:09:25 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Just another growing list of US military waning. F-35’s that are down 50 percent of the time, inability to develop hypersonics, ( the two last attempts failed), severe declining of manpower, wokeism embedded in the DOD and Pentagon, weak, very weak manufacturing base, ……the list is growing each day.

The positive? An inability to continue their forever wars. Every one of the war cheerleaders planned wars ( China, Ukraine, Iran, etc.) are not the hill to die on.


13 posted on 07/27/2024 9:11:10 AM PDT by delta7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin
Keep the Red Sea open

Build the Montana class for the Strait of Hormuz and the Bab al-Mandab.

That's what fast BBs are for.

14 posted on 07/27/2024 9:12:19 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

the Navy has clearly lost its ability to design good warships.

True, but that’s because the Navy now designs ships by committees - such that each design has all the latest bells and whistles, while able to preform all missions simultaneously and cost more than the already exorbitant money allocated, launching them years after the scheduled dates.


15 posted on 07/27/2024 9:15:50 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
Since McNamara’s cost plus contracting overhaul the primary skill set of every defense contractor has been strategic incompetence.

Fixed price contracts were tried in the past and they've failed as well. Basically, you're asking someone to guess just how long it will take them to invent something, then halfway through the government inevitably changes their mind and tells them to morph their invention into a different invention. It had problems.

16 posted on 07/27/2024 9:23:39 AM PDT by libertylover (Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

Been there suffered through that!


17 posted on 07/27/2024 9:27:01 AM PDT by Reily (f)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

7,000 tons and no ballistic missile defense = complete boondoggle.


18 posted on 07/27/2024 9:39:06 AM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111
This is idiocy - we have a proven ship design in the Perry FFG’s, get those plans out bring things up to date with logical changes and new weapons systems. Those were very economical and effective ships, start building them again.
19 posted on 07/27/2024 9:43:21 AM PDT by GaltMeister (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

I was a program manager on a Navy project. It peripherally involved with the LCS. I interfaced with a lot of Navy personnel, and they knew what they were doing...very competent. When I asked about the multiple decisions that gave us LCS every one of them knew the decisions were bad and said so. According to them, all those decisions came from one admiral who had a bee up his bum that the LCS was going to put him in the history books. He didn’t listen to any of the contrary reports or information. (All of which turned out to be correct.)

The idea of the new frigate was to leverage off an existing design because we needed to catch up due to spending so many assets on LCS. What did the Navy do? They immediately made massive changes in the frigate design adding risks and cost, thus negating the whole reason for buying a foreign design that already existed and was well proven.

I think the Navy lacks competent oversight. It’s not a competence problem lower down. It’s massive, massive egos wanting to put their personal stamp on something they really shouldn’t be allowed to touch.

Sometimes you just need a ship that’s good enough. You don’t need a ship that can do absolutely everything at fifty times the cost of good enough. The Navy needs some competent oversight from someone with a rolled-up newspaper who can slap an admiral across the head.


20 posted on 07/27/2024 9:53:48 AM PDT by Gen.Blather (Wait! I said that out loud? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson