Posted on 07/18/2024 7:06:13 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
Dr. Mollie James is an Intensive Care Unit and Emergency Room trauma surgeon who practices in multiple states. She has extensive experience in dealing with the aftermath of gunshots and treating gunshot victims.
Dr. James says the few pictures that have emerged from the rally scene don’t make sense.
“There should be a lot of blood, and there aren’t, in these pictures,” said Dr. James
Dr. James says that the pictures of what federal authorities claim is the body of Thomas Crooks on top of the American Glass Research building in Butler, Pennsylvania, from where Crooks is alleged to have taken shots at President Trump, is missing a large bloodspray behind the body that would be typical.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
https://barsoom.substack.com/p/crying-havoc
This blog post has a picture of the shooter dead.
He’s quite dead and the back of his head blown off with plenty of blood all over him.
Or a cow.
another affirmative action dunce publicly flaps her jaws ...
Once the heart stops, the blood doesn't keep flowing out of the holes.
otoh, look at what a Headshot .. or 3 .. did to jfk's head.. idk. She may be right, maybe this was staged, his head should have exploded.....maybe..
But the implication would be even a fake killing of the patsy. No doubt, false and distracting narratives are woven in to online discussions to confuse and discredit people, but sometimes hard to know which is which.
Someone said that the dead guy in the photos had gauged ears (with the gauge out) but that Crooks doesn’t have gauged ears.
Discussion is good.
Hearing from experts in fields related to this incident is good.
Blindly accepting information from government members of The Democrat Party Organized Crime Syndicate is dangerous.
I think you are confusing who she is talking about. She’s saying the SHOOTER should have had more blood spatter, not Donald Trump’s ear.
As a kid in the 1970s rural south, my dad sent me up on a old barn roof with a brush and paint. I wasn’t that thrilled about the job, but I didn’t really see much risk. Probably more of a ‘pitch’ than that barn roof was.
Like a DEI hire, a cow would go up the roof but wouldn’t go down!
Uh oh is right.
The doc is talking about blood spray behind the dead shooter, not behind trump’s ear.
Oh, c’mon, man.
I decide to avoid the tin hat stories for a couple days and THIS is what pops up?
Wait’ll the coroner’s report - ahem - and confirmation that he took the round to the mouth (e.g., the missing teeth), which trajectory - prone shooter, sloped roof, elevated shooter - would have put the round in the body core. Instant death = no heart = no blood pool, so the pics in question are utterly useless for the topic at hand (spray).
Just my opinion, vs. a ‘trauma surgeon’ who claims an entrance wound can cause burns and doesn’t know how long a dna test takes (”I don’t know.”).
Plausible, vs. the sometimes-typical GWP clickbait garbage.
I have shot deer in about every body part there is. Taking a brain shot leaves very few drops of blood on the surrounding area and the body. A chest shot can spurt blood all over the place. This little puke seems to have been hit in the “T-box” which is CPU disconnect for a human. Heart stops immediately.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flaccid_paralysis_(shooting)
A very young Gus Fring taking mental notes ;)
Exactly right. This “expert” is a ER trauma surgeon, not a crime scene investigator.
Also, you can’t tell squat from released photos because they only release the most sanitized ones.
Which will be FOIA at the earliest opportunities. Or Trump will have them released after he’s sworn in again.
In the meantime we need to hold Biden’s feet to the 🔥.
we will never know who fired what shots, alas. but i’d wager if we DID know, we would see that the kid didn’t fire at all
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.