Posted on 07/15/2024 6:01:26 AM PDT by Pete Dovgan
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/14/politics/secret-service-faces-serious-questions-about-security-footprint-and-rooftop-access-at-trump-event/index.html
https://x.com/ywnreporter/status/1812648353169060042?s=46&t=oXM3QUNDayEotvdo1W-zQA
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1812665335075483945?s=46&t=oXM3QUNDayEotvdo1W-zQA
https://fortune.com/2024/07/14/donald-trump-assassination-attempt-shooter-thomas-matthew-crooks-bomb-making-materials-vehicle-home/
https://www.businessinsider.com/ex-secret-service-agents-how-trump-assassin-could-fire-shots-2024-7
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/14/politics/secret-service-faces-serious-questions-about-security-footprint-and-rooftop-access-at-trump-event/index.html
https://thelibertydaily.com/7-things-we-know-about-would-be-assassin/
I put these links in so people could access the story. The US Federal Government has made two claims that I feel are implausible. The first claim is that the shooter was 'acting' alone. That means, in less than 12 hours they have claimed to research every part of his life, his contacts, his past, where he has been, who he as been with, who he may have been speaking with on-line (including on xbox/game consoles), where he trained and were he got him ammunition. I find that implausible.
The second is even more serious. This is the statement, from multiple individuals with video, that the sniper was recognized minutes before. The first claim is that they didn't know falls out because of the video evidence. The second claim that they couldn't shoot until the sniper shot first is ludicrous. The third claim that they needed authority to shoot with someone with a rifle aimed at a POTUS is so stupid not to bother in conversation. The final 'it was local cop problem' makes zero sense because they outlined the building as a risk during walkthrough.
When you start to see the Government and the Media try to make things up as they go along, it's a cover-up. Plain and simple, something is wrong.
+1
The cop should have fired off a shot into the ground.
A shot fired get police attention quickly.
At first I thought damn! an Antifa crazy. Then all the apparent negligence was reported and it began to look like a hired gun, or rather an impressionable antifa crazy that got some carefully planted suggestions from a federal agent. Such a one can be killed at the site to cover tracks.
“How did they ID him so fast “
Checked is billfold?
This video will make your head explode. It is literally a MUST see. The key point that blew me away was at the 4:40 mark.
Now, you need to see the information before that to understand why that mattered to me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ifq83hiAkgE
He had no wallet or ID on him or so it was reported.
it’s a WHITE WASH!!!
Your first point is correct.
I have somewhat of a problem with your second point. If there are 2 separate teams involved in the protection, it could theoretically be a case where they weren’t 100% sure the person on the roof wasn’t a friendly. What would happen if the SS accidentally shot a Butler County sheriff perched on the roof to protect the President?
The thing I don’t get is....The instant that they weren’t sure whether their was a friendly or an assassin on the roof, why in the hell didn’t they get Trump out of the line of (potential) fire? This makes absolutely no sense.
As soon as they noticed the guy, which was at least 60 seconds before the first shot, they should have covered Trump and got him out of there. Then they could determine whether they needed to neutralize the guy or not.
“likely signed off on by Biden”
Nope. Hitler left behind no signed documentation authorizing the “final solution.” He made sure his fingerprints weren’t on any evidence. Yet all his henchmen knew exactly what to do.
Same here.
But Biden is nothing but a puppet. I don’t think Clapper, Brennan, et al would even put Biden in the loop. Why run the risk of him blabbing?
* “We’ve built the best fraud machine ever.”
* “Well, son of a bitch, he was fired.”
This video will make your head explode.
I’m not sure that’s good phrasing there.
It’s absurd that they are saying he acted alone at this point in time.
An investigation of this whole incident has barely scratched the surface of anything.
Perhaps they would like the American people to think that he acted alone, and maybe an investigation will show that he’s just a lone nutcase.
But it’s way too early to conclusively State such things and yet they’re already putting together a narrative.
The kid was told to make sure his pockets were empty, he didn't even keep his car key on him. Whoever set him up knew the drill, and knew he'd never come down off the roof alive.
I saw an item re: his classmates said he couldn’t make the rifle club because he was such a bad shot...
“I still got the shovel.”
It’s just weird that Crooks and Yearick look so much alike. Other than that, I don’t trust 4chan.
The Bidet Regime is losing street credibility fast. Only those with TDS and the stupid will believe the government line.
The DNA story is bogus. Fingerprint would have been used before DNA, and there is no DNA system that works in minutes that can identify individuals.
The other interesting part of that video is not only the 3 month old prophesy about Trump being shot, but what he said is coming over the next couple of years. Not to mention what he says the spiritual consequences to Trump specifically.
I am not familiar with LEO speak but fingerprints would not be DNA.
DNA is blood test or skin test, etc. type of thing. In this situation I don’t know how long it takes to get a DNA test.
Does anyone know?
I suppose you could upload results to places like 23andme and see if anything popped.
Maybe they misspoke when they said they had to ID him with DNA.
This whole thing is suspicious.
See Thomas Massie’s statement about the .gov investigating themselves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.