Posted on 07/10/2024 12:54:52 PM PDT by Morgana
By the time the Trump campaign blasted out the GOP’s 2024 platform early Monday afternoon, most people in Milwaukee had to ask themselves: what just happened? For the delegates, who were sideswiped by the unconventional, fast-tracked, secret process, the entire morning felt surreal. The outcome was so pre-determined, so tightly controlled that most of the men and women who traveled from the furthest corners of the country wondered what they were even doing there.
While the RNC’s team and the Trump camp cheered the adoption of a platform they vowed would Make America Great Again, the mood on the ground wasn’t all that celebratory. It wasn’t just the outcome that was disturbing, “Washington Watch” guest host and former Congressman Jody Hice pointed out from Wisconsin, but also “how it all went down.”
Brent Keilen, FRC Action’s vice president for Strategic Initiatives, was a guest in the proceedings and saw with his own eyes how different the situation was from 2016. Typically, he pointed out, the process of adopting and amending the Republican platform takes at least two days. There are usually five or six subcommittees devoted to certain aspects of the document. They sit down, Keilen explained, and say, “Okay, let’s analyze this. Let’s have some good discussion just to make sure [nothing’s being] left out.” Incredibly, though, in a major break with tradition, there were no subcommittees at all.
In fact, Brent said, “There were delegates going to the mic and saying, ‘Hey, I actually thought I was going to be part of a subcommittee process first. What’s going on there?’” The whole thing happened “extremely fast,” he underscored — despite the fact that delegates weren’t given the platform language “until literally” they sat down that morning. “They didn’t have a chance to read it beforehand,” and then immediately they were forced to vote on it. “Many of them traveled [a long way]. … They spend a lot of time [and] energy to get here,” and frankly, Keilen said, they never got a say in what was adopted.
Hice, who spent a lot of years in Congress, pointed out that “one of the things that aggravated my constituents — and I think Republican voters all across the country, as much as anything else — was when we would get a 1,500 piece of [legislation] two or three hours before we’re voting on it, where none of us had time to read up, but we didn’t know what was in it. And we always gripe about [former Speaker] Nancy Pelosi’s famous comment of ‘Pass it and then find out what’s in it.’ But … it sounds very much like that’s what took place even today in the platform.”
That, many said, coupled with the secrecy of the whole event and the abandonment of longtime pro-life principles, rubbed plenty of delegates the wrong way. Gayle Ruzicka, a platform committee member from Utah, told Politico that the RNC staff “didn’t allow” a discussion on the language the platform used on abortion. “They didn’t even give us a chance to read it before we voted on it,” she said.
“I’m very frustrated,” Ruzicka admitted. “I think we were treated very poorly. We spent a lot of money to get here. We were supposed to have the opportunity to study it and read it. We didn’t get even a chance to read it first,” Ruzicka said. “They gave it to us, but we kept waiting to go to our committee and then they didn’t ever do committees.”
FRC’s Travis Weber, who was also at the committee meeting, found it ironic that Republicans were vowing to fight censorship in their document while conducting the platform with an “iron fist.” “You can’t even sit there and talk about free speech when the process [was] conducted that way. It needs to be called out and reckoned.” This should be an open forum “with input, with collaboration,” Weber insisted. “None of that was present. … The RNC wanted to retain a tight control on things and stop that.”
And what do you get when you silence people, he asked rhetorically? “You get … a frustrated group of people who are not feeling heard in a process in which they should feel heard. So that was very clear. I think it was a missed opportunity. And it was very disappointing because no one’s fooling anyone. Everyone knows when someone is trying to ram something down their throat, and it was very clear that this was being rammed down the throats of everyone there today.”
If you asked most delegates, Travis said frankly, “it made a mockery of the people who were selected to go here.” And to be fair, he continued, “There [are] some good things in this document. I think you’d actually have more people rallying around it if they didn’t feel so stepped on and disrespected in this entire process.”
Of course, one of the reasons for stiff-arming delegates was the Trump team’s desire, along with the RNC’s, to water down the 1,300-plus words of pro-life priorities in the 2016/2020 document. As the former president’s advisors admitted to the press, they were worried the abortion language would create too much “drama.” And while a handful of pro-life groups accepted the 90 words in exchange for continued access to Trump, FRC Action Chairman Tony Perkins refused to accept the gutted plank. “I cannot compromise biblical truth to advance a temporal political objective. I won’t do it,” he told Hice on “Washington Watch” Monday. “I just can’t do it.”
Gathering together as many delegates as he could, the FRC Action chairman put together a minority report to RNC leadership, expressing their deep disappointment with the way the committee bypassed the process and the 112 representatives’ views. Planting a flag in the ground that was so quickly surrendered, more than 20 delegates wrote, in part:
“Today we observe the vitality of a more recent but analogous set of commitments, embodied most prominently in the promise of the Republican Party to preserve the right to life of every human being from conception to natural death. That commitment made its way into the platform of 1976, twelve decades after that original session in Philadelphia. That commitment to a human life amendment and a call for the Fourteenth Amendment’s protection application to children before birth has been repeated in every platform since and, by this declaration of principle, we extend it now.
“In no season, under no rationale spurred by the exigencies of a political moment, can or should we abandon the high principles that have created and sustained this party, with God’s grace, into a third century.
“In the coming years, we pledge ourselves to continue to work for the good of every child, every parent, and every family. We rededicate ourselves to the core policy positions endorsed through deliberation and transparency with ever-increasing clarity in previous platforms, with respect to the funding of abortion domestically and internationally, the expansion of alternatives to abortion, support for credits for adoption and all children, ending the exploitation of embryonic human beings, and above all recognizing the application of 14th amendment protections to our developing offspring. These are issues for the ages and not for any single cycle in our national life.
“With heaviness of heart but fullness of optimism that the defense of life will inevitably prevail, we resubmit these ideals to our fellow Americans. As before, we do fondly hope and fervently pray that the scourge of abortion will speedily pass away, and to that end we renew our perpetual devotion and ceaseless labor to the cause of life.”
Other conservative leaders felt similarly betrayed by the hollowed out platform. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), mid-speech at NatCon, expressed dismay at the hijacking of the process in Milwaukee. “As we speak, the Republican Party is dropping family and life from its platform. And we wonder why it lost the last elections. Work. Family. God. These are the great loves that unite Americans. Republicans need to start defending these loves.”
Princeton’s McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence Robby George blasted those so tempted to accept these empty words in exchange for remaining in the 45th president’s good graces. “Pro-life leaders … will be tempted to go along with this without public complaint in order to retain some standing and influence in the future Trump administration. They may even claim that it is somehow a victory. In truth, it’s the opposite of that,” he posted candidly on Facebook.
“It is true that the thoroughly transactional Donald Trump appointed justices who provided the votes necessary to overturn Roe v. Wade. He kept his bargain with the pro-life movement on that one. But now Mr. Trump sees our cause — the protection of unborn children — as a political liability. He knows that seriously pro-life people cannot in conscience vote for Joe Biden and the Democrats, so he has no reason not to throw the pro-life cause under the bus. And, predictably, that is what he had now done.”
Chad Connelly, who made headlines for being summarily booted from his delegate position for being “too conservative, too Christian, too pro-life” the week before the platform committee, told Hice that “This cake was baked. [The RNC] had a desire to … steamroll.” Look, he pointed out, “Everybody I know realizes the country can’t take four more years of Joe Biden. At the same time, the process matters, the platform matters.”
The CEO of Faith Wins mentioned that “over a thousand pastors from all over the country” have contacted him concerned about the outcome with “disappointment, betrayal, shock.” “I took, I don’t know, over a dozen phone calls yesterday from concerned pastors who were now like, ‘What do we do? And how do we handle this?’ … Most pastors don’t endorse, but they do want to have a platform they can stand by…”
At the end of the day, they — like so many conservatives — understand that this is a document that transcends any one election. “No one in there is opposing the president,” Weber reiterated. “They’re just seeking to be honored and respected and around the table. … We’re raising concerns because we have to be honest. We cannot ignore things that we believe are essential for the flourishing of our nation. … But we’re going to continue to engage, to highlight the issues that we believe are essential [because] … it’s not about us,” he insisted. “… It’s about being a blessing to the world.”
Quote:
“So you support this twist of Trump’s platform by GOPe”
__________________
Says the one who supports DJT to pick pro choice Tulsi Gabbard as VP
Social Issues: Protect abortion rights. Ban discrimination based on sexual preference, identity.
Gabbard believes that abortion should remain legal and accessible. She voted against a proposed ban on abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy. She supports the legal status of same-sex marriage, opposes attempts to bar transgender Americans from the military and supports laws to ban discrimination based on sexual preference.
Well stated. 🙂👍
Generally that has been true and Trump criticized this in the past as well. With Lara Trump running RNC this was all supposed to be aligned with Trump. And it would be historic to have an in sync platform instead of candidates having to parse how they don’t support certain planks. The current one is an improvement, done to 20 point but they don’t match Trump and from that list to the other 15 pages, they don’t match. The doc was rushed, not edited, and published maybe, as you say, no one cares. But this is Trump’s RNC, run by Lara Trump, and there is no excuse for this.
Very likely true, but an hour of editing, maybe review by Trump and the campaign would have helped make sure it was 100% Trump.
For years, the Republican establishment allowed delegates to put together the most principled platform and sold out their voters any time they felt like it.
The ONLY thing that matters is if Trump can be trusted to keep his promises and he's proven he can be more than any President in any of our lifetimes.
Trump has done more for the pro-life movement (by putting judges on SCOTUS) to overturn Roe than all those whining about this combined.
For years, the Republican establishment allowed delegates to put together the most principled platform and sold out their voters any time they felt like it.
The ONLY thing that matters is if Trump can be trusted to keep his promises and he's proven he can be more than any President in any of our lifetimes.
Trump has done more for the pro-life movement (by putting judges on SCOTUS) to overturn Roe than all those whining about this combined.
No one with any sense should trust you to do anything but undermine Trump.
What are you ranting about? Have you been following any of the threads on the RNC platform? You really need to get over your DeSantis issues as nearly everyone else has long ago.
For years, the platform was stellar while your Republican establishment was PERFECTION while your Republican establishment buddies (like DeSantis) sold the base out at every turn.
Trump has RECORD of keeping his promises.
That's not good enough? Get the hell out and go to some website run by Bill Kristol or Lincoln Project.
Stop sidetracking legit discussions with your insults.
We've got 99 problems in this country and GOP platform isn't one of them.
It's totally meaningless to people like you that want to use to attack Lara Trump or Trump himself.
So you don’t care about that platform, fine. Move along and let the rest of us discuss it. BTW, if you haven’t notices, lots of Freepers have posted articles and participated in discussions about it. So be respectful and move along.
…yet still longer than the Constitution.
How pathetic. I joined the Constitution Party after I decided the Democrats were irredeemably predatory and evil, and the Republicans were irredeemably moronic and cowardly.
“cottage industries” is a spot on description. A good description of the pro-life orgs. I’ve noticed the pro-life industry is stagnate in their messaging. Pro-lifers get beat up and bloodied by the left with their propaganda that life issues intrude on a women’s choice.
The Pro-Life movement need to change their messaging. Will they - NO. There’s too many well paying positions, mean while we in the trenches get bloodied and the tragedy is the unborn pay the ultimate price w their life.
I’ve posted this on several threads, most b4 RvW was overturned and various websites w abortion commentary. I’m too old to push this msg as I would have “back in the day”.
Messaging by the pro-abort crowd of today states the mother is losing her right to abort her unborn child. I know sick, but it works for many empowered woman who feel they are being denied their’ right.
The new pro-life messaging needs to be about providing the unborn w their constitutionally guaranteed human rights - the human right to exist.
Though Civil War history was framed as ending slavery, it was, in fact, about providing slaves their God Given constitutionally guaranteed human rights. Many Christians, who joined the Union Army, joined based upon their human rights conviction. Providing slaves human right status by extension ended slavery.
This analogy to slavery is a winner for the unborn.
The presentation of providing the unborn their God Given constitutionally guaranteed human rights does not fall into the pro-abort trap of denying women their right.
This augment is an affirmation of the unborn’ constitutionally guaranteed human right to be born – to exist.
I pray that the Pro-Life hierarchy see this suggestion and flip their messaging.
Trump is one of a handful that has proven he can be trusted.
Thanks, Robert. Hugs.
Love the English language.
Get Smart - LY (humor) - Tom Lehrer
https://youtu.be/vjTiGCSizhI
I struggle with it, the English language. That’s why I never tried to learn a second language.🤣
I was HORRENDOUS in high school Latin. And the teachers cringed when I recited in French and Russian in college. I am only grateful that U of Chicago only wanted languages for research so it was reading, not speaking.
But English!!!! I love the way you can be so precise and I love the rhythm of words. I often didn’t know the words I wanted to use in a video script, but I knew the rhythm of the words and just needed to fill in the blanks.
That turned out so be incredibly useful when I spent those years researching 19th century American newspaper poetry. Rhythm was one of the things to look for when trying to identify anonymous poets.
****
“To Miss” was published by Henry Livingston, Jr, author of “Night Before Christmas” in the New York Magazine of Sep, 1791 under the pseudonym “R”. It also appears in Henry’s poetry manuscript book on pages 60-61, thus connecting Henry to the pseudonym “R.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6bjd4Y_9AM
That's when she hit me that I had either read the paragraph and added a word that wasn't there or I had skipped over a word that was there, which the result made the paragraph wrong because that word that I had added or omitted changed the entire meaning of the paragraph.
I had done this three times in a row. There was a reason I didn't like to read. I had some sort of issue reading. Of course I never looked into it, to see what it was. So, I still have issues reading to this day. I prefer to listen to an oral presentation rather than read. It must be some form of dyslexia. I have to read my responses like a hawk, and sometimes I still miss my mistakes.
I aways knew I was a little off anyway, so why worry about it. 🤣
I had surgery a few years back now, and the doctor told my wife that my innards were all screwed up. She told me but I can't really remember, but I think my circulatory system was out of place with normal people. I believe it was on top of my organs rather than being behind the organs So, I have internal issues as well. Oh well, I have gotten along for all these years, and as I enter into my twilight years I see no reason to concern myself with my foibles. I do not think there was any way to fix the issues anyway. 🤣
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.