Posted on 04/25/2024 5:36:54 AM PDT by Red Badger
The transfer of Army Tactical Missile Systems with a nearly 200-mile range ends a yearslong drama between Washington and Kyiv.
The Biden administration last month secretly shipped long-range missiles to Ukraine for the first time in the two-year war — and Kyiv has already used the weapon twice to strike deep behind Russian lines.
In March, the U.S. quietly approved the transfer of a number of Army Tactical Missile Systems with a range of nearly 200 miles, said a senior Biden administration official and two U.S. officials, allowing President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s forces to put at risk more Russian targets inside Ukrainian sovereign territory.
The administration will include additional long-range ATACMS in a new $1 billion package of military aid President Joe Biden approved on Wednesday, one of the U.S. officials said.
The provision of the long-range version of the ATACMS ends a lengthy drama in which Ukraine clamored for years to receive the weapon, driving a wedge between Washington and Kyiv. The U.S. quietly sent the medium-range version of the missile in October, but Ukraine continued to press for a weapon that would allow it to strike farther behind Russia’s lines.
Ukrainian forces have used the long-range missiles twice, first against a Russian military base in Crimea and more recently against Russian forces east of Berdyansk near the Sea of Azov, the senior administration official said.
The U.S. on Wednesday announced a new $1 billion package of weapons that will quickly be transferred to Ukraine now that Biden has signed off on the long-delayed foreign aid bill that passed the Senate this week. Among other weapons, the tranche will include Stinger anti-aircraft missiles for air defense; 155mm artillery rounds; Bradley Fighting Vehicles; Javelin anti-tank systems; and Claymore anti-personnel munitions, according to a Pentagon press release.
POLITICO first reported in March that the U.S. was sending Ukraine a second round of a different version of ATACMS, one that travels 100 miles and carries warheads containing hundreds of cluster bombs. The senior administration official, who like others was granted anonymity to detail a sensitive decision, said the March shipment also included the long-range version, and that the missiles arrived in Ukraine this month.
Russian military bloggers posted images of a strike on the Dhzankoy airbase last week and speculated that Ukraine used ATACMS.
The U.S. was initially reluctant to send ATACMS — even under sustained domestic and international pressure — due to stockpile concerns and fear of escalating the war. But Russia’s increasingly brutal tactics and more American production of the long-range version convinced Biden to authorize the transfer.
The Biden administration warned Russia that attacking Ukraine’s energy grid and using North Korean-provided missiles would lead the U.S. to reconsider sending ATACMS to Ukraine. Those strikes continued, leading top officials — national security adviser Jake Sullivan, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. C.Q. Brown — to unanimously recommend the weapons transfer.
The Biden administration believes providing ATACMS can give Ukraine some new momentum in the two-year war, forcing Russia to move back critical command and control nodes and other high-value targets such as aviation assets, said the second U.S. official.
The long-range strategic missiles will also allow Ukraine to hold key parts of Crimea at risk, the official said. That includes the Kerch Bridge connecting occupied Crimea to Russia, as well as ports and naval facilities in the peninsula from which Russia’s Black Sea Fleet operates.
The official acknowledged that Ukraine is still in a tough fight, and that Russia continues to throw manpower and resources at the battlefield.
“There’s no silver bullet weapon that’s going to change the character of the battlefield,” the official said, but: “Ukraine’s got something in their toolkit that they can use at a time in place of their choosing, that creates impact, that gives them an advantage.”
Biden approved the ATACMS decision in mid-February, the official said, but had to wait for the funding battle over the supplemental to play out in Congress. The House finally green-lighted more than $61 billion in Ukraine funding on Saturday and the Senate followed suit Tuesday, sending it to Biden’s desk for his signature on Wednesday.
In early March, however, Pentagon officials alerted colleagues that cost savings on other weapons contracts and humming production lines allowed the U.S. to deliver long-range ATACMS before the supplemental’s passage. The weapons were then secretly sent as part of a $300 million tranche of military aid announced in March.
MOST READ election-2024-trump-83096.jpg Arizona grand jury indicts Meadows, Giuliani, other Trump allies for 2020 election interference Appeals court greenlights release of secret Trump battles to block aides from testifying Johnson demands Biden send in National Guard during raucous Columbia visit How to Know If the Supreme Court Is in the Tank for Trump The US secretly sent long-range ATACMS to Ukraine — and Kyiv used them Biden last year approved sending the medium-range version of the missile but was still reluctant to send the long-range type Ukraine wanted. The U.S. secretly shipped the medium-range weapon, called Anti-Personnel/Anti-Material, and Ukraine used it for the first time last fall.
But now having long-range ATACMS in its arsenal allows Ukraine to threaten Russian assets inside the whole of Crimea as well as the Black Sea Fleet. The transfer could also boost morale among Ukrainian troops increasingly fearful that they have lost the advantage in the fight.
The House Ukraine bill approved on Saturday called on the Biden administration to send long-range ATACMS to Ukraine “as soon as practicable.”
The U.S. shipment follows a similar move by the U.K., which first sent its long-range Storm Shadow cruise missiles to Ukraine in May 2023, giving Kyiv the ability to hit targets up to 155 miles away. The weapon, which is launched from Ukrainian fighter planes, has allowed Ukraine to precisely target ammunition dumps, bridges and other critical infrastructure deep inside Russian-occupied Crimea.
The U.K. announced its largest Ukraine aid package to date this week, which induces 1,600 missiles, including more Storm Shadows. France has also sent its SCALP missile, which has a similar range.
Now that three allies have sent their longer-range missiles to Ukraine, it adds more pressure on German Chancellor Olaf Scholz to send his long-range Taurus missile. His government so far has refused to do so, yet the move has significant support in the German parliament.
Last year, Germany also refused to send its Leopard tanks to Ukraine until the U.S. agreed to send Abrams tanks. Scholz eventually agreed to send the tanks once Biden announced that several dozen Abrams would be sent.
Paul McLeary contributed to this report.
Years ago I read an article about the run-up to WW1. And I thought to myself, how could those leaders (on both sides) be so arrogant and so reckless?
Because of their foolishness, a terrible world war occurred. It didn’t have to happen. But at least we learned from their mistakes, right?
Evidently not.
Who approved it? The U.S. Congress, or malevolent rogue actors within the deep state MIC?
And did it change the trajectory of the war or just extend the pounding? It’d be nice is 60 billion came with a strategy, an objective.
God Bless America ( not ) !
Did Biden/obama, also, send troops over there to run these things?
No, it’s all done via ZOOM nowadays................😁
US aid seems finely calibrated to have the ukes lose as slowly and painfully as possible .
Leaning Right wrote: “Years ago I read an article about the run-up to WW1. And I thought to myself, how could those leaders (on both sides) be so arrogant and so reckless?”
Perhaps you should read a few articles about the run up to WWII. Think to yourself, about how attempts to appease dictators lead to a terrible world war. Compare Hitler and Putin.
Taking a break from defending that vax tyranny?
> Perhaps you should read a few articles about the run up to WWII. <
I’ve read a lot about those years. A lot. And you raise an important point. Lack of restraint led to WW1. Too much restraint (appeasement, actually) led to WW2.
As to Putin, how should he be seen? I have mentioned many times here that I consider Putin to be a war criminal. He started a war when no war was necessary. But is Putin another Hitler? I think not. He’s more like Kaiser Wilhelm II, egoistical and opportunistic. Quick to see insults, both real and imaged.
But he’s not Hitler. Treating him that way is an error.
.
Russia is facing a demographic collapse as Putin burns through the remaining able bodied men, leaving few to work in the manufacturing & industrial base, the population is likely down to only 140 million now and declining.
As far as another front or some big escalation goes, Putin can only dream as his military is not up to anything greater.
Oh, but it does.
"10% for the Big Guy."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.