Posted on 01/21/2024 6:04:24 AM PST by Enlightened1
Last month, Republican legislators in New Hampshire introduced a bill that would ban the “intentional release” of chemicals into the air.
The legislation, called “The Clean Atmosphere Preservation Act,” prohibits “the intentional release of polluting emissions, including cloud seeding, weather modification, excessive electromagnetic radio frequency, and microwave radiation and making penalties for violation of such prohibition.”
It also provides penalties for violations.
The legislation is sponsored by Republican state Representatives Jason Gerhard (Merrimack-25) and Kelley Potenza (Strafford-19).
The representatives argue that atmospheric geoengineering harms human health, the environment, as well as their state’s economy by releasing polluting emissions:
“The general court finds that many atmospheric activities such as weather modification, stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), solar radiation modification (SRM), and other forms of geoengineering, involving the intentional release of polluting emissions, harm human health and safety, the environment, agriculture, wildlife, aviation, state security, and the economy of the state of New Hampshire,” the bill reads.
“It is therefore the intention of the general court to prohibit SAI geoengineering and other intentionally polluting activities in New Hampshire’s atmosphere and/or at ground level, as further set forth by the terms and provisions of this chapter to preserve the safe, healthful, and peaceful uses of New Hampshire’s atmosphere for people, wildlife, and agriculture by prohibiting deliberate atmospheric pollution and manipulation of the environment, providing enforcement and penalties for violative activity.”
If the bill passes, the commissioner of New Hampshire’s Department of Environmental Services “shall immediately issue a cease-and-desist order upon the discovery of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), cloud seeding, weather modification or other atmospheric polluting activity.”
The bill will make it a felony to use “an unmarked or unidentified aircraft or other vehicle or facility to carry out SAI geoengineering, weather modification, cloud-seeding, or other polluting atmospheric activity.”
Individuals participating in releasing hazardous materials into the air “shall pay a fine of not less than $500,000 or be imprisoned for not less than 2 years, or both.”
The bill also mandates the state’s environmental services department to post advertisements in newspapers and on the departmental Internet website “to encourage the public to monitor, measure, document and report present, potential and past incidents that may constitute stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), cloud seeding or other polluting atmospheric activities.”
You can track the bill’s progress here.
Chemtrails = Geoengineering
Easy solution for DC: Don’t release the chemicals over New Hampshire.
As opposed to contrails, which no one has control of.
We don’t need cloud seeding here as we get enough rain.
NH is very protective of its native environment and very intent on keeping it as natural as possible.
The fun part will be discovering the government documents which authorize these activities.
I proudly wear the badge of “conspiracy theorist”.
“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”
Schopenhauer
I gladly accept the ridicule and the violent opposition on a variety of topics because I know how the story will end.
What about gate’s solar reflectors he wants to have in space? 🚀☔
Enlightened1 wrote: “Conspiracy Theorists proven correct once again Chemtrails = Geoengineering”
How does this absurd bill prove chemtrails exist or that they’re geoengineering?
“Chemtrails” is just a way to identify the crazies.
“Chemtrails” is pretty much meaningless as what we observe are natural contrails. However I agree with seeding, weather modification, etc. If some of those create trails following the plane, so be it. But that could also result from a release by a balloon or the like.
This could be construed as conservative talk radio by the crazies that believe in chemtrails.
Why would there be a bill if it did not exist?
There is the tool on the Internet called Google. If you type what is Geoengineering, then it comes right up.
Here you go,
https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu/geoengineering
If you go to the Spy museum in Washington DC, then you will see have been using weather weapons since the Vietnam war.
Now you know why the Ho Chi Minh trail was always wet.
What? No laws against our star to stop solar flares or limit electromagnetic radiation in all wavelengths? State level GOPe in action...
Crazies = Informed Americans that can think vs. the brainwashed sheep that never learned from history and fall for every trick in the book
Individuals participating in releasing hazardous materials into the air “shall pay a fine of not less than $500,000 or be imprisoned for not less than 2 years, or both.”
What does this mean? If you have a diesel truck and it’s spewing black smoke, does that constitute a release of harmful chemicals? This could go wrong for all of the good it does.
Does the list of forbidden things include Chinese spy balloons?
Because there are politicians who think they need the ignorati vote to stay in office.
“Chemtrails” is just a way to identify the crazies.>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Not much interested in the so called crazies.
Very interested in why and what the federal government is spraying at high altitide.
“Some researchers have studied the composition and effects of this phenomenon, which may to us seem harmless and commonplace. According to these experts, chemical trails are the result of experimental operations which have manifold purposes. The main objectives, albeit unproven, range from the meteorological to the military. The analyses carried out have verified the presence of the following elements in the chemtrails: barium, aluminium, radioactive thorium and caesium, copper, titanium, silicon, lithium, cobalt, lead, ethylene dibromide and several pathogenic agents.”
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-7-2012-002906_EN.html
That stuff will float right over them anyway, they’re all gonna die.
It would be fairly easy to prove the existence of nefarious chemtrails...a fleet of air worthy drones ready for immediate takeoff which can collect the air around, in, and below the chemtrails. Analyze the air samples on the ground using routine chemical analysis, such as glc, mass spec. hplc, nmr,etc.
With today’s high tech, chemicals, weapons, tools, just postulating toxic chemtrails or denying their existence is not enough to convince anyone. For sure, there is enough bad stuff (some natural) in our air and water and soil already.
How does this absurd bill prove chemtrails exist or that they’re geoengineering?
~~~~~~
Where’s the harm in outlawing something which doesn’t exist?
This should be done nation wide. What is the cost of this absurdity that is chemtrails and where exactly is it in our fine budget? St Louis seams to get hit 2 to 3 times a week, it’s never ending waste.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.