Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EPSTEIN DOCS: Bill Clinton Named, Billionaire Thomas Pritzker Accused, and Michael Jackson Mentioned
Red State ^ | 01/04/2023 | Bonchie

Posted on 01/03/2024 10:13:35 PM PST by SeekAndFind

After years of obfuscation, the infamous "Epstein docs" have finally been released. They specifically deal with a lawsuit brought by Virginia Giuffre, who was sex trafficked as a minor by a now-deceased Jeffrey Epstein. 

For years, rumors have swirled about what was contained in the various depositions taken during the case. Now, there are actual quotes to go along with some of the allegations, and they are eye-opening.

For example, as suspected, not only is Bill Clinton named, but he's mentioned in a sexual sense.

🧵Not making any promises here... just posting screenshots of things I think are interesting as I go through the unsealed docs in Giuffre v. Maxwell. So far the documents added are all from the Boies Schiller firm. #EpsteinClientList

"Clinton likes them young" pic.twitter.com/Ju58Lb3fQ6— Jennifer Van Laar (@jenvanlaar) January 4, 2024

Notably, as of this writing, not a single mainstream press outlet has found that line interesting. One would think that a former President of the United States being called out by a pedophile as liking them "young" would be worthy of some headlines. 

To be clear, that one line is not definitive, but it's another piece of evidence suggesting that Bill Clinton was very close to Epstein, and it's fair to suspect they weren't just flying around together to take in the scenery. That there has never been a serious push to investigate exactly what the former president's involvement was is astonishing. Democrat privilege is real. 

It wasn't just Clinton mentioned, though. According to testimony given by a victim in the case, billionaire Thomas Pritzker (who is related to Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker) was allegedly one of the people she was forced to sleep with. 

Oddly enough, Michael Jackson was also mentioned as having been at Epstein's home in Palm Beach, FL. 

Of course, one name that expected to make a lot of appearances was Prince Andrew of the British Royal Family. He has already settled a case out of court with Giuffre.

The documents are over 1,000 pages so there is a lot to sift through. Overall, there aren't a ton of surprises. That's not because what's in the documents isn't shocking but because some of the details have already been reported previously. For example, we already knew Bill Clinton was going to be named. With that said, the fact that Epstein seemed comfortable talking about the former president's preference for liking "them young" is very noteworthy.

Regardless, it is important to remember that this is just a single lawsuit dealing with a single plaintiff. What is mentioned in the depositions is by no means an exhaustive account of Epstein's disgusting crimes and those who were involved, both as enablers and clients. It should also be pointed out that many other rich and/or famous people are mentioned in the documents, though I haven't covered them all here. RedState will continue to provide coverage as more is revealed.



TOPICS: Conspiracy; Society
KEYWORDS: billclinton; documents; epstein; epsteinslist; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: SeekAndFind

I would make a guess as to the name redacted right after Prince Andrew’s. Think about Andrew’s family dynamics.


41 posted on 01/04/2024 6:35:42 AM PST by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Clinton also appealed to the younger voters because he was cool. I remember seeing him playing the saxophone on the Arsenio Hall show. He smoked pot, but he didn’t inhale. Yeah, sure you didn’t billy. When he said “I feel your pain” I knew we were in trouble. Gullible people ate that up.

IMHO Bill Clinton was the best politician I have ever seen. A total scum bag. Probably a fun guy to play a round of golf with and have a couple beers. Not someone I would trust around my wife or daughter. Also, not someone I would want to cross because you might end up dead.


42 posted on 01/04/2024 6:41:50 AM PST by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963
the younger voters because he was cool

Hope and Change. I remember talking to people who supported him and said; "We need change", that was it, their total reasoning other than as you sad they liked him. And yes, he was/is a total scumbag opportunist.

43 posted on 01/04/2024 6:43:44 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

Trump was named in the Epstein document release.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Assholes like you need to get zotted and zotted now you scumbag troll.

He was mentioned as NOT being on the island, any plane rides or with Epstein.

Can a mod delete this prick for spreading this bullshit?


44 posted on 01/04/2024 9:45:20 AM PST by mlitefan (Long time lurker...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

You are a fing liar and spreading blatant lies about trump.

It’s a mod zots this KoS troll. The sooner the better.


45 posted on 01/04/2024 9:49:36 AM PST by mlitefan (Long time lurker...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

Quit trying to make Trump guilty. It won’t make DeSantis more desirable.


46 posted on 01/04/2024 9:57:33 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Exactly. I have that exact recollection. I was having lunch at a diner in L.A., where I was living at the time, and the waitress asked me who I was voting for. I told her Bush and listed a number of reasons that seemed important at the time - He wants to lower the capital gains tax, He supports a strong military, and blaming him for reneging on “No new taxes” is a poor reason to vote for Clinton who was openly promising to do that very thing, etc. Her eyes kind of glazed over and her response was, “But don’t you think it’s time for a change”? I smiled and said, “Yeah, I guess your right. I’d never thought about that” and went back to eating my lunch.


47 posted on 01/04/2024 10:19:43 AM PST by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Bernard

We can’t say. I just remember reading the printed newspaper essay of that image of GHW Bush staring off into space when aides tried to get him energized about running hard against the opponent.


48 posted on 01/04/2024 12:03:47 PM PST by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Notably, as of this writing, not a single mainstream press outlet has found that line interesting. One would think that a former President of the United States being called out by a pedophile as liking them “young” would be worthy of some headlines.”

Unless, the press is DSM (deep state media). ...which it is.

Dense. Lead dense.


49 posted on 01/04/2024 2:32:10 PM PST by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh (Wake me up when somebody tells the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

Hey dick head...post links to your lies you f wad.

Seriously, this fing troll needs to be zotted.


50 posted on 01/04/2024 3:15:14 PM PST by mlitefan (Long time lurker...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mlitefan

https://www.jacksonville.com/story/news/2019/07/09/trump-called-epstein-terrixfb01c-guy-before-denying-relationship-with-him/4737931007/

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-flights-jeffrey-epstein-jet-lolita-express-1857109

Here are a couple for you.


51 posted on 01/04/2024 3:21:20 PM PST by Fuzz (. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: mlitefan

lol.

I only have the one account.

Your response was predictable.

Ignore anything that makes you uncomfortable, if that’s the safe space you require.


53 posted on 01/04/2024 5:39:18 PM PST by Fuzz (. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: elenvee
I agree. Add to that that other women trafficked by Epstein said in Maxwell’s trial testimony that they were introduced to Epstein by Giuffre, not Maxwell. IOW, Giuffre was one of the traffickers and should be in jail with Maxwell. Add to that that her lawyer was one David Boies of Clintonista fame, and the mystery deepens. I think the whole Prince Andrew lawsuit was an attempt to divert heat away from the Clintons.

Giuffre was over the age of consent at 17. Prince Andrew has had women throwing themselves at him since he was a teen. How would he know Epstein was paying her for anything? IMHO, Queen Elizabeth settled the case because she knew Charles would soon succeed her, and didn't want any more scandal with Epstein, AND Charles was on his guest list. That looks bad and could have come out at a trial. Yes, a royal scandal that wasn't much of one did divert attention from Epstein and the Clintons.

Returning to my original point, how can we charge 17 year olds with crimes as adults, but not acknowledge that a few months before turning 18 Giuffre knew what she was doing? There was nothing innocent about Giuffre at 17. She is a victim in the modern sense that all women are victims of something that some man did to her, and she should not be judged for how she made money. She was always about the money, and still is.
54 posted on 01/04/2024 8:43:50 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: Fuzz

Ignore anything that makes you uncomfortable, if that’s the safe space you require.

My safe space is grinding liars like you into the ground.

You want to voice a different opinion? I think that is great. I may not agree with it and I might even get snarky with you.

Post blatant lies like you did? I will put you in the ditch every time.


56 posted on 01/07/2024 9:33:24 AM PST by mlitefan (Long time lurker...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mlitefan

Lol


57 posted on 01/07/2024 10:03:31 AM PST by Fuzz (. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson