Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUST IN: Jack Smith Ramps Up Effort to Jail Trump, Asks Supreme Court to Weigh Trump’s Immunity Argument – Here’s Why
The Gateway Pundit ^ | December 11, 2023 | Cristina Laila

Posted on 12/11/2023 4:10:01 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man

Special Counsel Jack Smith on Monday asked the US Supreme Court to weigh in on Trump’s immunity claims.

In September Trump was hit with 4 counts in Jack Smith’s January 6 case up in DC: Conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights.

Jack Smith is fighting to keep the March 4 trial date (one day before Super Tuesday) in his January 6 case against Trump in DC.

Trump’s lawyers argued that Trump is immune from federal prosecution for alleged ‘crimes’ committed while he served as US President.

On Monday, Jack Smith skipped over the appellate court and went straight to the US Supreme Court on Trump’s immunity claims:

QUESTION PRESENTED

Whether a former President is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office or is constitutionally protected from federal prosecution when he has been impeached but not convicted before the criminal proceedings begin.

“This case presents a fundamental question at the heart of our democracy: whether a former President is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office,” Smith wrote in the Monday filing.

Jack Smith is circumventing the appellate court and going straight to the US Supreme Court for one reason: To seek a conviction before the election.

Via constitutional expert Jonathan Turley:

“Special Counsel Jack Smith is now seeking to leapfrog the appellate court and ask for a ruling from the Supreme Court on Trump’s immunity claims. The only reason for this petition is to seek to guarantee a trial of Trump (and possible conviction) before the election,” Turley said.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Local News; Politics
KEYWORDS: illegallawfare; jacksmith; supremecourt; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
This is absolutely nuts.
1 posted on 12/11/2023 4:10:01 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

All process crimes.


2 posted on 12/11/2023 4:11:20 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

The plan is to railroad Trump by jailing him and handing Nikki Haley the nomination. This is why the media has been showing her beating Biden by 17 points but Trump only beating him by 4 points. It’s a planned set-up.


3 posted on 12/11/2023 4:12:55 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects Trump is being given the Alex Jones tr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

later


4 posted on 12/11/2023 4:15:57 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Proudly Clinging To My Guns And My Religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

The whole case is an outrage, as is the documents case, while they bring no charges against Biden and Pence.


5 posted on 12/11/2023 4:19:34 PM PST by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man
"Jack Smith is fighting to keep the March 4 trial date (one day before Super Tuesday) in his January 6 case against Trump in DC."

How is this not election interference?
6 posted on 12/11/2023 4:22:30 PM PST by clearcarbon (Fraudulent elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

They agreed. Reply by Trump before Aug. 21.


7 posted on 12/11/2023 4:22:32 PM PST by Jemian (Y'all are pushing my buttons tonight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Jack aught quit it. He’s got many years ahead of him to comingle with the deplorable masses. That is unless he goes back to Belgium where he came from to hide out in perpetuity. Some World Court assignment being paid for by the American taxpayer.


8 posted on 12/11/2023 4:23:54 PM PST by blackdog ((Z28.310) My dog Sam eats purple flowers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

All this accomplishes is to make Trump stronger.


9 posted on 12/11/2023 4:24:37 PM PST by devane617 (Discipline Is Reliable, Motivation Is Fleeting..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jemian

Who agreed?


10 posted on 12/11/2023 4:24:58 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects Trump is being given the Alex Jones tr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Of course a sitting POTUS is immune.

Otherwise all living ex presidents could be prosecuted for violating US war crimes and torture statues.


11 posted on 12/11/2023 4:25:32 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Mad Jack has a deadline of December 15 to explain to the House Oversight Committee why he thought he had the right to bring these charges (he submarined it on to the NARA documents case).

That may lead to him being cut off financially or worse. It’s all an obvious abuse of power and in fact an arrogation of power he didn’t have.

So he’s gotta speed up the process if he can.

But the arrogance of demanding a hearing from the SCOTUS bypassing normal procedure is off the charts for this guy. He’s something unseen in American history.


12 posted on 12/11/2023 4:27:51 PM PST by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

If the Supreme Court says, yes, then Pedo Joe is in Supreme trouble.

He’s been committing crimes while we post.


13 posted on 12/11/2023 4:28:54 PM PST by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Convicted of NOTHING! No insurrection, but a protest against a stolen ielection that the feds would not investigate.


14 posted on 12/11/2023 4:29:28 PM PST by kenmcg (ti hi o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Probably right.


15 posted on 12/11/2023 4:31:40 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (Procrastination is just a form of defiance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

"One and all"

16 posted on 12/11/2023 4:34:59 PM PST by Eccl 10:2 (Prov 3:5 --- "Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Not a valid opinion. Nikki is not eligible, according to the constitution.


17 posted on 12/11/2023 4:35:37 PM PST by Freeper (My authority? I can read & words have meaning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

It would be hilarious if the SC decided he had immunity lol. Then what?


18 posted on 12/11/2023 4:46:10 PM PST by MrRelevant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

If Smith is asking for the Supreme Court to decide, it absolutely MUST be that he knows that the ‘fix is in’ and the S.C. will decide against Trump.

He wouldn’t risk it otherwise.


19 posted on 12/11/2023 4:46:33 PM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

I think Smith is shooting himself in the foot here. If he let this play out, his handpicked judges would probably deny the immunity claim, and he’d get his convictions, and then maybe they would be reversed on appeal.

If the SC agrees to make a determination, and they side with Trump, which seems to be the most likely outcome, then Smith’s whole case is demolished and he’ll never get a conviction.


20 posted on 12/11/2023 4:47:40 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson