Seems like Fa needs to buy another letter. Perhaps, a “G”.
Also a man? Is he something other than a man?
What is wrong with just telling these perverts to go to hell with their fantasies?
It is a huge waste of resources to allow this perversion to fester.
Obviously, no MAN should be part of a Sorority, but this article is not at all clear on exactly what was the disqualifying factor for ‘Fa’(la-la)?
It sort of reads that the upper management took refuge in looking at the semantics of comments from “Fa”, when he was accepted. If that is what happened, then they still haven’t laid down the law about no MAN will be able to join the sororities. You better believe this ruling will be tested by another Trans until a clear and undisputable policy has been expressed.
Did they word it like this on purpose?
I remember back in college we used to sing, “Chi O, Chi O, it’s off to bed we go...”
I would say *What a crybaby*, but I don’t see this guy as any more genuine than Mulvey, or whoever the Bud LIite virtue signaler is.
This was all done just for the attention and the complaints are textbook wishful thinking. He creates too perfect a scenario for his statements to be real.
“… That secured a fail for Fa, as the student is not only a woman, but also a man:…”
*************************************************************
Well, my cat is also a dog. My pet is very “fluid”. /sarc
They’ve become “AntiFA”?
Silly question - can't be both? I'm not really hip to the new rulebook.
From the article... “Guzman describes ‘themselves’ “.
What, does he identify as a group now? “Themselves”? The correct pronoun is “himself”. He is man.
Boy o boy, when I rushed sororities they could reject you for just not holding a tea cup correctly.
Add Chi Omega to the list of biology deniers.