This Clip Is Very Telling To Probably What Happened To Tucker (2 minute video)

Luke Rudkowski via Twitter ^ | 04/24/23 | Tucker Carlson

[Enlightened1]

At the 1 minute and 34 second mark Tucker says the media is not here to inform you.  Even on the big things that matter like the economy, war, covid, etc...  They are working for a small group of people that are running the world. They are the Praetorian Guard, and we should treat them with maximum contempt because they have earned it. 

 

https://twitter.com/Lukewearechange/status/1650662552408391683

[AAABEST]

Getting tired of hearing about doocey's cookbook !

Then why do you sit there watching those vapid morons?

[Vermont Lt]

“ They are working for a small group of people that are running the world.”
————-

If it is such a small group, let’s publish their names and examples on how they rule the worl.

I’ll wait.

And let me guess: It’s the Jeeeeews.

[dynachrome]

Vox Day says that the lamestream media are the gatekeepers. No speech without their approval.

[Mopp4]

Lol.....I know...after canning of Tucker, I’m moving on....

[MayflowerMadam]

Someone on RAV (LFS6B) last night said that the problem is that he’s been too tough on big pharma re “vaxes”. Big pharma foots the bill for TV advertising and they strong-armed Murdoch to get rid of him.

Also, a few weeks ago Schumer publicly told Murdoch to get rid of Tucker. (I don’t recall the context, though.)

[DiogenesLamp]

The in-your-face evil of whoever controls this country, their bizarre use of force and fraudulence, indicates that assassination is on the agenda. Murder is by far the most logical plan of action for them.

If people are paying attention, they began to suspect that there are people behind the scenes actually deciding the direction of the country, and one way they do this is by deciding what is going to be put on the "news" programs.

[DiogenesLamp]

I am getting the impression the firing was about the Jan 6th videos or lack thereof.

The truth cannot be allowed to be told. The truth is that it was all a setup by the shadow government.

They had to let the Shaman guy out because of those videos.

The government lying about an "insurrection"? Why would the government lie about an "insurrection"?

And we have a shadow government? How long do you suppose this has been going on?

[DiogenesLamp]

I am getting the impression the firing was about the Jan 6th videos or lack thereof.

The truth cannot be allowed to be told. The truth is that it was all a setup by the shadow government.

They had to let the Shaman guy out because of those videos.

The government lying about an "insurrection"? Why would the government lie about an "insurrection"?

And we have a shadow government? How long do you suppose this has been going on?

[1Old Pro]

I am getting the impression the firing was about the Jan 6th videos or lack thereof.

One of the main contributing factors for sure.

[DiogenesLamp]

And let me guess: It’s the Jeeeeews.

Pretty sure there are some Jews in it, but more like it is the large corruption cartel that has been getting rich off of Washington DC for a very long time. I'm thinking this stuff goes back to at least the 1820s.

It's relatively clear that certain cities pretty much control the direction of our government, and these cities are New York, Boston, Washington DC, Chicago and Los Angeles.

[DiogenesLamp]

And while i'm at it, let me relate to you something I realized back in 1995.

After Newt Gingrich led the party to massive gains in the Congress in the 1994 elections, he set out to enact his "contract with America." One of his flagship ideas was the balancing of the federal budget.

Now I don't know a conservative who is not in favor of balancing the Federal budget. Even the strictly economic conservatives have always believed that the Federal government should never spend more money than it takes in.

To most of us, cutting Federal spending so that it matches Federal income is a no brainer and hardly controversial.

So imagine my surprise when I tuned in to "Good Morning America" and watched people like Joan Lunden, Charlie Gibson, and others who's names I don't remember, condemn the idea as "reckless" and "irrational."

I listened to all the talking heads on ABC denounce the idea. They were all *AGAINST* the idea of balancing the Federal budget.

I thought to myself, "how can this be? Why on Earth would *ANY* sane person be against balancing the Federal budget?"

Then an idea occurred to me. People who were benefiting from excessive Federal spending would be against it. But these people were the news media. How could they be benefiting from excessive Federal spending?

And then another thought occurred to me. They are all headquartered in New York, and New York has a lot of financial institutions connected to Federal spending and the management of Federal programs. I would imagine a *LOT* of Federal money moves through New York, and enriches the people there that administrate these programs.

Surely the powerful wealthy class in New York would have the ear of the people who run the Network news programs? It stands to reason that the "news" people would put forth the ideas their employers wanted advanced, and it also stands to reason that powerful companies in New York can influence the people who control the networks.

So that's when it started to dawn on me what is going on with our "news."

[bohica1]

There was a you tube video of the whole interview [this clip was taken from]. I watched a little of it this morning and saved/planned to finish watching it later this evening. Guess what? Yep, they removed the video from you tube saying it “went against their standards” [insert eye roll here]. Anyway, IF I remember correctly, the date on the full interview was either March or April 10th, 2023. IMO, the video just told too much of the TRUTH on what is really going on with global billionaires running everything in the world.

[I hope those who did this interview post the whole thing elsewhere once they realize youtube has taken it down. Perhaps Rumble would be a good place to put it?]

[SomeCallMeTim]

Thanks... it figures

[BroJoeK]

DiogenesLamp: "And we have a shadow government? How long do you suppose this has been going on?"

DL, you should study up on the 1975 Church Committee reforms of the US intelligence agencies:

"a US Senate select committee in 1975 that investigated abuses by the
1. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA),
2. National Security Agency (NSA),
3. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and
4. the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

Chaired by Idaho Senator Frank Church (D-ID), the committee was part of a series of investigations into intelligence abuses in 1975, dubbed the "Year of Intelligence", including its House counterpart, the Pike Committee, and the presidential Rockefeller Commission.
The committee's efforts led to the establishment of the permanent US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence."

"The most shocking revelations of the committee include
1. Operation MKULTRA involving the drugging and torture of unwitting US citizens as part of human experimentation on mind control;[1][2]

2. COINTELPRO involving the surveillance and infiltration of American political and civil-rights organizations;[3]

3. Family Jewels, a CIA program to covertly assassinate foreign leaders;[4][5][6][7]

4. Operation Mockingbird as a systematic propaganda campaign with domestic and foreign journalists operating as CIA assets and dozens of US news organizations providing cover for CIA activity.[8]

5. It also unearthed Project SHAMROCK in which the major telecommunications companies shared their traffic with the NSA (while officially confirming the existence of this signals intelligence agency to the public for the first time)."

Seems like maybe not every abuse discovered in 1975 was 100% eradicated.

[DiogenesLamp]

Seems like maybe not every abuse discovered in 1975 was 100% eradicated.

Nor has it's history been adequately mapped. Even Abraham Lincoln said this: (According to Jack London.)

“I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. . . . corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.”

According to this source, it comes from a letter to Col. William F. Elkins Nov. 21, 1864. That's very interesting. I had previously tried to find the origin of this statement, and I could only trace it back to Jack London's "Iron Heel".

So Lincoln was suggesting Eisenhower's "Military Industrial Complex" speech 90 years before Eisenhower. I am relieved to have discovered this statement from Lincoln actually has a good pedigree.

So this "shadow government" thing has been going on a long time, and even Lincoln confirms it.

[DiogenesLamp]

[DiogenesLamp]

Ping to message 55. I thought you might like to be aware this Lincoln quote had been authenticated.

[jeffersondem]

“. . . corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.”

It sounds like Lincoln had an inkling that his total war on the agrarian South was feeding the destruction of the Republic; but at that point he must have felt he had no choice but to continue the killing and replace the real constitution with a synthetic constitution.

[BroJoeK]

"Nor has it's history been adequately mapped. Even Abraham Lincoln said this: (According to Jack London.) "

I think we've been over this subject before and there's no solid evidence Lincoln ever said something even remotely similar.

Of course, Jack London was a socialist/fascist/revolutionary, and so was eager to put his own words into a respected conservative Republican's mouth.

[DiogenesLamp]

I think we've been over this subject before and there's no solid evidence Lincoln ever said something even remotely similar.

Joe, you clearly did not read my message. I included in it a link to the original source of Lincoln's statement.

Lincoln *DID* say that. It is now indisputable that Lincoln said it.

https://ratical.org/corporations/Lincoln.html