The US Supreme Court Case that Could Change Everything

Golden Age of Gaia ^ | 11/26/2022 | Suzanne Maresca

[nikos1121]

From the website ralandbrunson.com, updated as of November 23, 2022

Background ~

Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor Brunson (the brothers) witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of congress that the election was rigged. What got their attention was when the proposition to investigate those claims was presented to Congress and put to a vote.

What came as a shock to the four brothers is when they discovered that 387 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence actually voted against the proposed investigation, thus thwarting the investigation. Whether the election was rigged or not was no longer their main concern. What now became the concern was when those members of Congress violated their sworn oath by voting to thwart the investigation.

The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Deron had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in that part of the financial world, so he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris.

He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied, but this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation.

The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Deron had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in that part of the financial world, so he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris.

He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied, but this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation.

Their brother Gaynor was heavily occupied with his audio/video television business (Rock Canyon Studios) so Deron got together with his other two brothers to plan out the strategy. They decided to have their oldest brother Loy to be the name on the lawsuit, which is called a “Complaint” and because he would be on the Complaint, the Court would refer to him as the Plaintiff. The 388 people being sued will now be called Defendants.

Loy filed the complaint, which eventually got stuck in the Federal Court, so they got together and decided to have their brother Raland file the identical lawsuit with his name on it, in the Utah 2nd District Court. While Loy’s lawsuit continued to be held hostage in the Federal Court, Raland’s lawsuit eventually made it to the SCOTUS.

The events of both lawsuits [from March 23, 2021 to November 23, 2022] can be seen at https://ralandbrunson.com/

[j.havenfarm]

The complaint was sworn out by nineteen sovereign citizens, none of whom would countenance a single upper case letter in their name, or pledge allegiance to a flag that has a fringe on it.

Honestly, I despair: our FRiends, having had their hopes raised and dashed by secret executive orders, the Insurrection Act, and who warranto writs, are seeing unicorns again. From the depth of more than thirty years before the bar, FRiends, this will be treated as crackpot trash.

Hopium is extremely addictive. And “at least someone’s doing something”
Counts for bubkus if it doesn’t yield results. And this won’t

[Dr. Franklin]

SCOTUS *HAS* agreed to conference the question of Certiorari. This will NOT be a pocket denial. SCOTUS *HAS* been in touch with the Brunson's, even requesting that they expedite the filing. In the Brunson's favor is that this is PRO-SE, and that it is under SCOTUS Rule 11, and under Federal Emergency status.

If true, that just means that one Justice moved the case to conference. It takes four to get a writ of Certiorari for the court to hear the case. So, this is a good step, but a higher test remains.

[Dr. Franklin]

Once a member of the House, the Senate, or the President has been duly administered the Oath of Office, they are in that position and can only be removed in the manner that the Constitution says they can be removed. None of those manners include nullifying an election after the fact by a court because fraud was uncovered.

Each house of Congress is the judge of the election of its members. There is no time limit on that power. Murkowski can take the oat of office in January, and if the next Senate determines the ranked choice voting was a fraud, they can send her home. The Article III power of the federal courts is subject only to limitation by SCOTUS. Nothing in the constitution prevents either the D.C. District Court from hearing a writ of quo warranto, or SCOTUS itself from hearing that case if brought under its original jurisdiction.

[conservativesister]

As important as this is it should be posted DAILY!!

I’m not complaining that it is posted again since I missed it when you saw it. \

THANKS for posting again.

[Yo-Yo]

Each house of Congress is the judge of the election of its members.

Article 1 Section 5:

Each House shall be the judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members, and a majority of each shall constitute a quorum to do business; but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the attendance of absent members, in such manner, and under such penalties as each House may provide.

Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a member.

Each House shall keep a journal of its proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such parts as may in their judgment require secrecy; and the yeas and nays of the members of either House on any question shall, at the desire of one fifth of those present, be entered on the journal.

Neither House, during the session of Congress, shall, without the consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.

I don't see anything about a court being able to remove a member as a result of a civil suit.

[C210N]

Can view the Loy interview here:

Loy/Nino/Juan/Ghost

[SunkenCiv]

387 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence actually voted against the proposed investigation, thus thwarting the investigation. Whether the election was rigged or not was no longer their main concern. What now became the concern was when those members of Congress violated their sworn oath by voting to thwart the investigation.

[Dr. Franklin]

I don't see anything about a court being able to remove a member as a result of a civil suit.

You're looking in Article I, not Article III. The writ of quo warranto is in the U.S. Constitution right after the power of judicial review to declare laws of Congress unconstitutional, and right before the section on standing.

[nicollo]

Rather incoherent article, but if this does get cert, then a certain few Justices had better get a new, secret home address.

[LS]

199%

[absalom01]

Reading this thread, it’s become clear that some have been familiar with this case for some time.

I admire your optimism, though I can’t share it.

[Hootowl99]

The lawsuit does not presume fraud occurred or did not. No decision or relief is requested on the fraud point. Fraud yes/no is not a factor.

The lawsuit alleges that the congress persons who voted not to investigate if fraud occurred violated their oaths of office to defend the constitution and existing law.

As I understand it, there is a 10 day window between the election and certification in which congress is obligated to investigate, that means it’s nondescresionary, election complaints. This investigation was blocked from occurring by the 300 some congress people. Voting to block via the election certification I think, is not an investigation.

Apparently, the USCC has voted to allow the emergency petition to go forward from step 1. It took an approval vote of 4 or more Justices to go foreword to step 2. Since the petition was accepted as an emergency, this means that a resolution of the petition will be fast tracked outside the normal slow methodological pace. This could be resolved in a small number of weeks.

Hope I haven’t mangled this too badly. That said, my opinions….

[Maris Crane]

IF the SC takes the case...and they may be thinking what I’m thinking...here are four people...ordinary people with no obvious agenda...JUST THE KIND OF PEOPLE WHO MAKE UP...

“WE, THE PEOPLE...”

They appear to be really disturbed about the election and by quietly and tenaciously and patiently...without help from the media sought to find out WHAT HAPPENED.

Something went wrong and it would be like...a peasant, in the field, feels strongly about an injustice...

LET’S HEAR WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY.

---

And that’s the way this is playing out in my little brain.

[Paal Gulli]

SCOTUS is irrelevant, the demoncrats own the voting machines.

[semimojo]

Apparently, the USCC has voted to allow the emergency petition to go forward from step 1. It took an approval vote of 4 or more Justices to go foreword to step 2.

Not so. The case got thrown out of the lower court because you can’t sue congressmen for acting within their capacity as congressmen. It’s called sovereign immunity, it’s basic to our system and wasn’t a hard call for the court.

The plaintiffs threw a Hail Mary request to SCOTUS, where it now sits, but they get thousands of such requests each year. Very, very few are accepted.

This case is such an obvious non-starter that it will be culled out by clerks and the justices will probably never see it.

Even if they all thought the Congress should have done more this case is so lacking in merit and understanding of the law they would never use it as a vehicle to go after the legislative branch - even if they could.

Since the petition was accepted as an emergency, this means that a resolution of the petition will be fast tracked outside the normal slow methodological pace.

‘Accepted’ means it was received and logged by the clerk. It’s going nowhere.

[bitt]

P

[MHGinTN]

The theft is too big to be repealed.

[nikos1121]

We will see

[philman_36]

This is about actions not taken before the inauguration and after the election.

I can post the relevant parts if you would like.

[matthew fuller]

Note to self-
Stay up with progress on this!