p
It is a feature, not a bug.
Great News for the Pillow Guy!
It’s not defamation if the machines don’t work right.
The process of counting the ballots run through the machine and comparing them to the tabulator results should be required on all machines in every election.
That won’t catch a deliberate vote switching code. But it will catch a tabulator dropping votes.
Spyware Voting machines
With multiple incidents in multiple counties I’m wondering if the Democrat strategy is to turn AZ elections into total toast and lose representation in Congress for the state rather than give up a Democrat advantage.
Correction, or clarification, needed. Georgia has like aroudn 160 counties.
So this article is not correctly headlined.
I believe I voted on these machines.
You got to a pedestal stall and select your vote, review and confirm. It prints out a piece of paper with your vote on it. You review, and then you take it to a scanner, that looks like a fax machine on top of a sealed box.
It scans it, apparently both sides. Doesn’t matter if you get it oriented correctly. And drops it into the sealed box.
There is no indicator that it counted it or counted it correctly when you put it in the scanner. But there is a paper trail.
2/3 of 81 million possibly fraud
Maybe they can have the Stanford Election fraud denier of CNN fame Justin Grimmer,
( a Professor of Political Science and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University,
>see
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4098080/posts <
)
come and share his wisdom and expert inquiry.
Meanwhile, all the Feral “judges” are helping these maggots sue anyone who challenges them.
Our First Amendment was tabulated
by DOMINION and our Second Amendment
Is Next.
81 million votes for Biden, and the moon is made of green cheese.
Dominion is suing Lindell ( The Pillow Guy)for lible......this will likely help Lindell a lot.
Dominion isn’t the only manufacturer of these things...
The key piece of evidence that will bring down the entire electronic voting machine industry is their adjudication rate and change logs. The certification specifications for all machines require less than 1 percent error rates. Every machine that has ever been forensically audited since the election has had rates over 40 percent and some as high as 60 percent. The audits also showed the required logs of who changed what votes had been disabled or deleted.
Until the machine vendors can demonstrate that they meet the adjudication rate specifications required by law, they should be banned from use in US elections.
The inherent problem with pursuing these multiple incidences of tabulating errors is that the courts have consistently prevented legal action because plaintiffs were determined to not have standing to bring the various suits. The allegations of errors and fraud never reach a point where validity or invalidity is ever determined.
Which is how the MSM, et al are able to claim there is no proof of fraud or election issues. But, what they can’t do is claim that all the allegations have been “debunked,” that hasn’t done either . . .
“He didn’t win, did he?”
Bttt.
5.56mm
Wonder why the left is freaking out about poll watchers? Here ya go.
Somehow during the development and acquisition of voting machines over the years, the unnecessary need for proprietary code injected itself.
The actual technology needed for voter tabulation is probably at the level of desktops in the 1970s.
Why the secrecy and high acquisition and maintenance costs for machines that do nothing but count votes?
Why not just go back to paper ballots, one-day voting? The manual approach has to be cheaper, more reliable, more accurate, secure, and faster don't you think?