Posted on 10/04/2022 7:21:50 AM PDT by bitt
Open records requests reveal 64 of 66 Georgia counties have the same unsolved 'Tennessee Error' that caused seven scanners to miscount hundreds of ballots in Williamson County.
In a podcast episode released last week Thursday, David Cross and Kevin Moncla of the Election Oversight Group reveal that open records request from 64 of 66 Georgia counties show the same security error “QR code signature mismatch” and warning message “Ballot format or id is unrecognizable” that caused seven scanners to miscount hundreds of ballots in Williamson County, Tennessee.
The "Tennessee Error" is an “anomaly” discovered on Dominion’s Image Cast Precinct (ICP) Tabulators (also referred to as "scanners") that occurred during a Williamson County election held on October 26, 2021.
The Election Assistance Commission (EAC) defines an anomaly as "an irregular or inconsistent action or response from the voting system or the system component, which resulted in the system or component not functioning as intended or expected."
In Williamson County, an election worker tallying votes on a post-it note realized that hundreds of ballots removed from a tabulator did not get counted.
Even though that tabulator never signaled that a problem occurred.
(Excerpt) Read more at kanekoa.substack.com ...
Our First Amendment was tabulated
by DOMINION and our Second Amendment
Is Next.
81 million votes for Biden, and the moon is made of green cheese.
only if it identifies the voter
Dominion is suing Lindell ( The Pillow Guy)for lible......this will likely help Lindell a lot.
Dominion isn’t the only manufacturer of these things...
64 of 66 Georgia counties X every county in every swing state.
Where are the REPUBLICANS, and election officials on this????!!!!
DVS...also pronounced "De Ve Ous" = Devious
Symbolism matters to leftwing communists
The key piece of evidence that will bring down the entire electronic voting machine industry is their adjudication rate and change logs. The certification specifications for all machines require less than 1 percent error rates. Every machine that has ever been forensically audited since the election has had rates over 40 percent and some as high as 60 percent. The audits also showed the required logs of who changed what votes had been disabled or deleted.
Until the machine vendors can demonstrate that they meet the adjudication rate specifications required by law, they should be banned from use in US elections.
The voting demo-dead are the commie-donkeys' most reliable "supporters."
Excellent and very true.
Dominion isn’t the only manufacturer of these things...
/\
Well
It’s not the only company selling the machines,,,true.
But almost all of the machines regardless of brand names are made in Communist China.
The inherent problem with pursuing these multiple incidences of tabulating errors is that the courts have consistently prevented legal action because plaintiffs were determined to not have standing to bring the various suits. The allegations of errors and fraud never reach a point where validity or invalidity is ever determined.
Which is how the MSM, et al are able to claim there is no proof of fraud or election issues. But, what they can’t do is claim that all the allegations have been “debunked,” that hasn’t done either . . .
“The process of counting the ballots run through the machine and comparing them to the tabulator results should be required on all machines in every election.
That won’t catch a deliberate vote switching code. But it will catch a tabulator dropping votes.”
When I worked at the NASA AMES research center with the ILLIAC IV computing project, Part of our jobs as System operators was to run periodic full system tests. This was because of the nature of the system’s overall design. The system consisted of 66 processing units: 1 Main; 1 Master; and 64 Processing Units. The original concept used 256 Processing Units, due to its size and complexity and cost, it was downsized to the aforementioned size. As you can imagine accuracy was paramount. It was supposed to work within the sciences using Fluid Dynamics: like weather forecasting, climate change, tide flows, tectonic plate movements, etc.
To ensure each run was “true” we would test the entire system for an hour after each two-hour run. ANY error flagged the entire system for maint downtime, with the entire malfunctioning element being pulled, repaired, RE-TESTED, reinstalled, and ANOTHER system test performed. It also meant the app run had to be re-run, again.
As important as elections are to us all, I believe the same testing should be periodically run on the election “tabulators”. Yes, it would be a pain, but it would force increased accuracy into the process.
THEY ARE IN ON IT!!!!!
The GOP didn't, and STILL doesn't, want DJT in the White House!!!!
WAKE UP!!!!!
Bar code ties voter to ballot
Correct, so one can only wonder why it is not made known to the voter how their ballot was counted by a machine
At least paper only ballots the old way have to be actually recounted. They can’t just pretend there was a recount by looking at the digital totals again.
Maybe this needs further input from me …. I have repeatedly, each time I voted I asked for information on who my ballot said I voted for and have been told that I do not have the right to that information once ballot is placed in machine and gaining that information is against the law. May have something to do with who counts the votes. In my state a machine counts the votes and voting locations are run by democrats
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.