Posted on 09/01/2022 1:32:33 AM PDT by dennisw
Vaccines are taking an average of 5 months to kill people The CDC has been hiding the Social Security Administration death master file. I got it from a whistleblower. This shows deaths are taking 5 months from the jab to happen. This is why it's hard to see.
Steve Kirsch 32 min ago Executive Summary We’ve always assumed the vaccine kills you quickly (in the first two weeks) because that’s when people notice the association and report it to VAERS. This is still true; it does kill some people quickly.
However, most of the deaths from the vaccine are happening an average of 5 months from the last dose for the second dose. It may be getting shorter the more shots you get but there are arguments both ways (since there can be survivor bias).
But this explains why the life insurance companies got off-the-charts all-cause mortality peaks for people under 60 in Q3 and Q4 rather than right after the shots rolled out.
The five month delay is also consistent with death reports where people are developing new aggressive cancers that are killing them over a 4 to 6 month period.
So when you hear of a death from stroke, cardiac arrest, heart attack, cancer, and suicide that is happening around 5 months after vaccination, it could very well be a vaccine-related death.
The data from the Social Security Administration death master file (ages 18 to 55) I got this chart from a whistleblower who works for HHS. This is data you are not supposed to see. The mortality increase (60% at peak) is huge. That sort of increase can only be caused by something novel that affected massive numbers of people.
There is only one possibility that fits that: the COVID vaccine.
The peak is September 9, 2021. -------- EXCERPT!
Can you not understand that apples/unexpected deaths is a case of “correlation does not equal causation”? Same as divorce/margerine?
Yes, Jon Stewart is a clown alright. Nice that you enjoy his show.
You sure seem have a chip on your shoulder about thinking others are calling you stupid.
Hey dishonest q theorist
As usual you haven’t read about any outcomes
You haven’t read my posts
I wasn’t ever dictated what to do
Your precious IVM and HCQ have weak evidence at best
Monoclonals are superior.
I am so glad you can speak with such authority having no idea what you are talking about
Have a pleasant day!
🙏
I don't see you even mildly warning about the new Omicron jabs, even though they haven't been through any human trials, and have been tested on eight (yes, as in 7+1) mice.
Tell me what kind of meaningful error bars you expect out of that, to justify giving a jab to millions of people, for something that even your fellow trolls, like David UnChased, say is not a concern anymore.
Troll.
Not gene therapy. Look up where genes are. Hint. It’s not on mRNA
I understand that you're a dishonest troll.
Your trolling consists of making dishonest, insinuating statements against anyone warning about the clot shots.
The difference, I as pointed out, is that apples/unexpected deaths, do not even have a fanciful, putative mechanism; but the clot shots DO.
And as you said elsewhere in this thread, correlation can show you where to look for causation.
But you continue to insist that anyone pointing out strong correlations, is a wild-eyed fanaticist or worse. Yes, Jon Stewart is a clown alright. Nice that you enjoy his show.
SO are you. And I don't enjoy either his show OR your trolling.
You sure seem have a chip on your shoulder about thinking others are calling you stupid.
I have a chip on my shoulder about trolls. Like you.
Why are you lying? I’m not the one posting stuff I know isn’t true. You all vax pushers are.
From the CDC website itself. They admit that breakthrough infections happen and that it can still be transmitted.
“ When someone who is vaccinated with either a primary series or a primary series plus a booster dose gets infected with the virus that causes COVID-19, it is referred to as a “vaccine breakthrough infection.”
When people who are vaccinated get COVID-19 get a breakthrough infection, they are much less likely to experience severe symptoms than people who are unvaccinated.
People who get vaccine breakthrough infections can spread COVID-19 to other people. “
I have not been dishonest. You have been dishonest numerous times, claiming I have written things I did not. You try to start flame wars, with the constant name calling and false accusations. Stop. I am not interested in a flame war. Stop.
Answer post #183 then.
You have been dishonest numerous times, claiming I have written things I did not.
I used paraphrase, even literally using the words "scare quote" and rhetorical, IMMEDIATELY before the words you disavow.
And on this thread, I posted both your exact quote, and the post of yours it was from, in immediate juxtaposition to what I said.
You try to start flame wars, with the constant name calling and false accusations.
I'm not trying to start flame wars. You are trolling, by constantly exaggerating any possible flaw in anything warning about the jabs; and by linking ALL of the claims together, from whatever source, as though accepting any one claim, requires a person to also avow the most dubious ones. THAT is trolling. STOP.
A baby step. Good girl! ...NOW address the issue that the Omicron jabs (for which 170 million doses were ordered, meaning they plan very wide distribution, which also implies some degree of coercion likely)...were not tested on humans AT ALL, but only on 8 mice.
Let's see if you can apply your strictures about the proper use of statistics, and the significance of results, to that.
Or do you only to that to attempt to discredit all opposition to the jabs?
Too bad it’s true. I don’t like to see it, but it’s true:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4089368/posts?page=58#58
Here is the a recent claim of yours, yes using quotation marks,that I wrote something I did not, right here on this thread:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/4089955/posts?page=104#104
On another thread, one of the times you did it, you tried to weasel of it by claiming “scare quotes” and then proving you don’t really understand what scare quotes are, or how to use them. Anyone could see what you were doing: trying to make other Freepers believe I had written things I never wrote.
As for your creative “paraphrasing” ...
You are the one doing all the name calling and “get rekt” and on and on. It looks like flame warring to me, and stalking me from thread to thread. I asked you to stop.
Maybe you need to have a nice glass of iced tea or something and cool off. It’s a hot day.
Lots of assumptions there crybaby.
Sounds like you have been forced to tow the line by your States DOH. Forced or not, very sad.
You Qsters are bordering on the verge of losing grip on reality. I necer was forced to do anything. I present clear and convincing evidence of what is a therapy all could agree on.
And you somehow pretzel that into I had to do what I was told? The level of mental gyrations of your statement is quite impressive.
“You Qsters are bordering on the verge of losing grip on reality. I necer was forced to do anything. I present clear and convincing evidence of what is a therapy all could agree on.”
Have you ever prescribed ivermectin? Never. Right? How about your patients taking D3, quercetin, zinc to deter getting a case of Covid? Have you ever advised this?
You're trolling again. I didn't "attempt to weasel out" you lying troll. My original post in that thread, which you objected to, used the exact phrase "scare quotes" literally. I didn't drag in the words 'scare quotes' after the fact, as your accusation above misleadingly implies.
Then you apparently did a Google Search for the words scare quotes and posted a link which attempted to prove I didn't know what 'scare quotes' meant.
But the very first sentence of YOUR link, said that they were quotes around words, indicating that the words were not supposed to be taken literally.
Which is exactly how I used them, when I posted the phrase ("scare quotes", rhetoric) next to the words I paraphrased.
How many non-death medical issues are plaguing people after the boosters? My wife had her third booster several weeks ago and has been hospitalized for a dozen or so days with Parkinsons-like symptoms.
I warned her repeatedly, but she listened to the “experts” instead. Our primary care doctor also recommended against any more boosters and she ignored him.
The Q theorists are really in an uproar today. Must be that they are getting their rear ends kicked in arguments and realizing that whatever relevance they had is slipping. Gotta keep the fear porn going.
They had an early confab (chapter 423 or so) last night. Ever notice new trust the plan threads turn up when they are taking a complete beating?
And as a bonus the uptick in amount of Q theory threads which is nothing more than Steve Kirsch opinion acting like it’s fact is continue to reduce the pace of donations. People are really voting with their wallet. They just continue to reject it.
Nonsense. I asked you to stop. So stop. I don’t want to have to ask a Mod to sort this out. They already have enough to do.
Again, I wish you a pleasant day.
The new ivermectin video is a must see
This video is approved by Doctors Pierre Kory and Paul Marik and many others. The video is NOT approved by the FDA, the CDC, the NIH, CNN, or the White House. Producer: Mikki Willis, Length: 15 min.
Steve Kirsch
2 hr ago
Ivermectin: The Truth is an amazing film, less than 15 minutes long! I highly recommend this film. Watch it and share it.
Pierre Kory, Paul Marik, Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Chris Martenson, Richard Bartlett, and Mike Yeadon all appear. My name appears briefly at 11:45 in the video. Still trying to get that debate with the mainstream “experts.”
Maybe he grabbed up a copy of Cliff's Notes- 1984 or 1984 For Dummies and studied up real quick...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.