Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vaccines are taking an average of 5 months to kill people == Steve Kirsch
Steve Kirsch ^ | 9 -- 1 | Steve Kirsch

Posted on 09/01/2022 1:32:33 AM PDT by dennisw

Vaccines are taking an average of 5 months to kill people The CDC has been hiding the Social Security Administration death master file. I got it from a whistleblower. This shows deaths are taking 5 months from the jab to happen. This is why it's hard to see.

Steve Kirsch 32 min ago Executive Summary We’ve always assumed the vaccine kills you quickly (in the first two weeks) because that’s when people notice the association and report it to VAERS. This is still true; it does kill some people quickly.

However, most of the deaths from the vaccine are happening an average of 5 months from the last dose for the second dose. It may be getting shorter the more shots you get but there are arguments both ways (since there can be survivor bias).

But this explains why the life insurance companies got off-the-charts all-cause mortality peaks for people under 60 in Q3 and Q4 rather than right after the shots rolled out.

The five month delay is also consistent with death reports where people are developing new aggressive cancers that are killing them over a 4 to 6 month period.

So when you hear of a death from stroke, cardiac arrest, heart attack, cancer, and suicide that is happening around 5 months after vaccination, it could very well be a vaccine-related death.

The data from the Social Security Administration death master file (ages 18 to 55) I got this chart from a whistleblower who works for HHS. This is data you are not supposed to see. The mortality increase (60% at peak) is huge. That sort of increase can only be caused by something novel that affected massive numbers of people.

There is only one possibility that fits that: the COVID vaccine.

The peak is September 9, 2021. -------- EXCERPT!


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Health/Medicine; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: 1killervaxx; 1toomanyvaxtards; 2deathvax; 5monthstolive; adspam; antivaxxcult; avaxdeathcult; cancer; cardiacarrest; cdc; clotshot; crazytown; dumbingdownfr; embarrassinggarbage; everyonedies; everyoneiknowis; flunkedbiology; flunkedmath; freepathonkiller; gethelp; graphene; heartattack; imstillalivethough; keepcraziesonqthread; kill; kirsch; losingourminds; nutcase; pleasegethelp; qtardiusmaximus; qvirus; seekhelpnow; shortbuspost; stevekirschagain; straightjacket; stroke; truthhurtsshotshills; vaccines; vaxxersdumbdownfr; vaxxershatereality; wentfullqtard; whypostthiscrap; zapzotthevaxtards; zot; zottheqtards
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 381-383 next last
To: David Chase

Quote
You must really trust people

People?
No

Government? Hell NO
Big Pharma? Hell NO
Big Medicine? Hell NO

Enjoy your conspiracy theory..


161 posted on 09/01/2022 9:23:22 AM PDT by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Fury

False data..

Just not missing data..

Some mean campaign has been plotted against the forces of good and pristine government, good and pristine big Pharma,good and pristine big medicine, to screw with those benevolent forces of truth, justice, and the America way..

Enjoy your conspiracy theory...


162 posted on 09/01/2022 9:26:28 AM PDT by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: CatHerd

no sale


163 posted on 09/01/2022 9:27:14 AM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Apparently you fashion yourself some type of intellectual but it actually falls pretty flat. I suspect you aren’t nearly as insightful as you think you are.

Perhaps you should take a lit course on 1984 to better examine the main players in the story since you are confused about some of them and the message Orwell was trying to communicate.

In any event thanks for the diversion.


164 posted on 09/01/2022 9:28:48 AM PDT by Warriorposter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Warriorposter; 50mm; Old Sarge

You’re the one who pretended he never HEARD of Winston Smith; and then in the space of far less than an hour, suddenly pivoted to know all about the book 1984;
the subtleties of its messaging;
and who the various characters are.

AND that you suddenly know them all at a greater level of detail than I do.

AND pivoted from that to the idea that I’m a pseudo intellectual.

All this from a 1-day-old troll or retread.

IBTZ.


165 posted on 09/01/2022 9:36:08 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Some journals have a more rigorous peer review process than others. Some have shockingly low standards, you are correct! I’m left shaking my head sometimes. Something slips past the reviewers at the good ones, too, sometimes. None are infallible.

Then there are the media reports claiming a well-done study showed something it never showed at all. These are frequent.

Like that Wayne Root story claiming a Lancet study showed the vaccines lowered overall immunity, suppressed your immune system. He based that claim on a letter to the editor of a low-ranking journal by a Japanese doctor with an axe to grind.

The Japanese doctor cited the Lancet (highly ranked, but not infallible) study as his source for that claim. But when you look at the Lancet study, nowhere does it ever say that. It does show is the efficacy of the vaccines have waned over time and are now worthless, or practically worthless, against the new Omicron strains. Perhaps it was a translation error or a language problem on the part of the Japanese doctor. He did the same with other articles be cited in his letter.

Then Tucker picked up the story from Root (or another parrot) and ran with it, calling the letter to the editor an “article”(!). Letters to the editor don’t go through a peer review process. Not that it would have done much good at that journal with low standards, anyway. I like Tucker and wish he’d get better research staff. It was an easy thing to catch. Heck, little old me caught it.

As so this stuff gets spread around ...


166 posted on 09/01/2022 9:36:45 AM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Heh, the vaxer predictions haven't materialized. Oh, the vax will keep you from getting sick. Um, no it didn't. The vax will keep you from transmitting it. Um no, it didn't.

Why sit there and post stuff you have to know is not true? What is the point?

167 posted on 09/01/2022 9:36:57 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: one guy in new jersey

Back atcha


168 posted on 09/01/2022 9:37:14 AM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

i vote you are a troll and disrupter


169 posted on 09/01/2022 9:41:21 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

According to you and Steve Kirsch.

Maybe the husbands didn’t like the margarine their wives were buying. Maybe the men in Maine prefer real butter. 😄

Seriously now, I was simply agreeing that correlation does not equal causation and making a funny. It must be sad to have no sense of humor.


170 posted on 09/01/2022 9:41:59 AM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I got it from a whistleblower. This shows deaths are taking 5 months from the jab to happen.

I'd love to see data that supports this.

171 posted on 09/01/2022 9:43:46 AM PDT by TankerKC (Be first with the truth. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delchiante

Re: 162 - LOL!

Good luck!


172 posted on 09/01/2022 9:44:55 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: CatHerd

I agree most of the media reports (on all sides of this) are dubious at best.

I prefer to wait a decade or so to let the stuff settle out...in the meantime no vaxxes for me.

It is amazing how long it takes for “the truth” on vaxxes or other substances to be determined.

That is why traditionally the FDA had a very lengthy and complex vetting process.

They got it right the first time—this “emergency” stuff is nuts—a total violation of the “do no harm” mantra that dates back to ancient times.


173 posted on 09/01/2022 9:53:10 AM PDT by cgbg (Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Fury

Get your shots Fury.

Many good shots still available..
Don’t wait till they’re all gone..

Or don’t.
Be like the free thinking pure bloods who have doubted their govt way before Russia Russia Russia..

Maybe it’s the Russians messing with VAERS


174 posted on 09/01/2022 9:54:32 AM PDT by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Warriorposter

You avoided my question :- /


175 posted on 09/01/2022 9:56:03 AM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

It can be any magnesium supplement. But people mention mag glycinate. I have Now Foods brand powder, and it is actually a bi-glycinate/ bisglycinate....

So more glycine for more absorption of the magnesium. But less magnesium per 1/4 teaspoon/ -— But regular old mag glycinate is good enough

https://www.nowfoods.com/products/supplements/magnesium-bisglycinate-powder (at Amazon etc.)

***** K2 comes first but if you are taking 7-10 thousand or more D3 units daily, then a good idea to take magnesium too.

****** Best deal on D3. The red pill!! Red bottle anyways....If you want 5000 units daily then eat one every other day _____ Carlyle Amazon d3 10000 units and $2 less than last year. Walmart online and others have it too.
https://www.amazon.com/Carlyle-Vitamin-Softgels-Promotes-Supplement/dp/B07GRBQY5B


176 posted on 09/01/2022 10:01:26 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner
This is nuts. All it might accomplish is to discredit all of us who are opposed to the jab.

 Reasonable people should be asking a lot of questions about operation warp speed, the resulting vaccines, the apallingly bad public response to the CCP virus, but there is a concerted effort to strawman any concerns about the vaccines in particular with outlandish clickbait.  First it was 5G reception, then it was self-assembling nanomachines, then the pandemic was actually caused by the vaccines, which were secretly rolled out in the fall of 2019.  And now monkeypox is caused by the vaccines.

All of which crowds out any reasonable analysis or discussion of accountability.   Who benefits from all of that?

177 posted on 09/01/2022 10:05:25 AM PDT by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CatHerd
Yeah, I know the troll trick

"clown nose on" / "clown nose off"

as exemplified by Jon Stewart on The Daily Show.

No sale, troll.

You were responding to a post that said

Luckily I see there are readers who are thinking about his stupid blog posts and realizing you could make as strong an argument that apples are causing unexpected deaths.

and included that sentence in your reply.

That context indicates the emoticon at the end should be taken as "ha ha, aren't Kirsch and his mindless-conspiracy-followers stupid" rather than the more generic "ha ha, you can find all kinds of daffy correlations" Troll.

178 posted on 09/01/2022 10:06:04 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

I don’t have a former name


179 posted on 09/01/2022 10:11:51 AM PDT by Warriorposter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Agreed on the media reports. Both sides.

It’s a good thing the question of whether to get vaccinated is now moot. The Covid virus, like other Corona viruses, has mutated to become more contagious but less virulent. The vaccines are not effective against the new Omicron variants. Why take a EUA vaccine that doesn’t work for a virus that is no worse than a mild case of the flu or a bad cold? Why take a risk, any risk, for no benefit? Why bother?


180 posted on 09/01/2022 10:24:33 AM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 381-383 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson