Posted on 04/25/2022 8:29:14 AM PDT by conservative98
Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
·
4h
Here’s my monologue from yesterday’s Life, Liberty and Levin
https://gettr.com/post/p170ppncdc6
We’re on to you, you neocon POS.
I think it was Hannity that labeled Levin “the great one”, same guy who tells us 99% of the FBI are good guys...
Levin = Neocon. It’s than simple.
Really don’t need warlike neo con globalists to lecture decent, rational, patriotic Americans about the need to reject Marxism.
Maybe while he’s cheerleading for Ukraine, he should tell Zelensky this bit about nationalism
Levin has gone off the rails, like so many others.
I never liked him that much. Now he sounds like a whack-job.
Levin can shove it when it comes nationalism and populism.
Mark jumped the shark.
> you must reject American Marxism, nationalism, populism and all the other -isms… <
So Levin is putting nationalism and populism in the same basket as Marxism. In response, I reject Levin and Levin-ism.
I see conservatism isn’t very popular around here anymore.
Levin committed career suicide last night demanding US intervention in Ukraine.
He's a disgrace.
Yes, I am on to him now. Took me a while. It’s a shame, as I really once had great admiration and respect for him.
Umm, so any other form of Marxism is OK?
How about: “Made in American ensures the best, unless it includes any Marxist components — in that case it is the worst in the world.”
It’s kinda like racism, including any bit of it poisons the entire project.
“Really don’t need warlike neo con globalists to lecture decent, rational, patriotic Americans about the need to reject Marxism.”
Worse, he is telling everyone to essentially reject America First by rejecting Nationalism.
Conservatism without Nationalism is like Faith without Works.
Reagan and Trump were nationalists. As was every previous POTUS up to 1960.
I miss Rush.
“Levin committed career suicide last night demanding US intervention in Ukraine.”
Agreed.
Nationalism
I thought it meant protecting these independent, sovereign yet United States’ best interests and I don’t see how meddling in the affairs of other countries has helped these United States one bit. We used to meddle in Ctrl/South America. For what reasons? We meddled in the Middle East. How’d that work out for us? We “helped” Ukraine when they were gaining their independence in the 90s. We helped with their “elections”(color revolutions) Why? So it could become a slush fund for pols? How about Korea or Vietnam? Necessary or helpful to us?
So which of these independent, sovereign United States full of independent, sovereign people was helped by any of the above? We get involved in these things to help pols and big business but the result is a bunch of young people getting killed in some other country that did not attack any of these independent, sovereign United States.
What am I missing blinky?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.