The Powerful Pfizer Presentation That Got Dr. Robert Malone Kicked Off Twitter - Pfizer's own vaccine trial data shows an INCREASED risk of illness and death for the vaccinated.

kanekoa.substack.com/ ^ | 1/2/2022 | KanekoaTheGreat

[AndyJackson]

It’s clearly the mass formation psychosis in action. Don’t confuse the in-the tankers against Trump with facts that could save their own lives or show that Dr. Fasci is claiming 98% success with an injection that is maybe 4% effective.

[Pollard]

Yet another doc returns from obscurity to become a prolific poster; https://freerepublic.com/tag/by:swingdoc/index?more=119006272

Posted in 2011 quite a bit, a few times in 2013, once in 2017 and then it’s on like donky kong starting 11/3/2020

Odd restart date considering covid had been around for almost a year.

---

PDF created by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance, which consists of over 500 independent doctors, scientists, and health care practitioners.

Or some anonymous FReeper with ‘doc’ in their username that made a recent comeback

Who to believe?

[David Chase]

It seems credible comments/commentators make you nervous.

Bummer you don’t investigate nutty claims with such concern from Blogs posted here.

[mykroar]

ping

[PGalt]

Thanks for posting, bitt. BTTT

[Caipirabob]

President Trumps position has always been that of the originally stated elderly and vulnerable citizenry. He never pushed mandates for those outside of the targeted group. Statistically, if one looks at the cumulative numbers from multiple sources including red states and hospitals in red areas, the vaccines provide protection for those groups up through Delta as of November 2021.

[Georgia Girl 2]

In effect the vaxx is doing exactly what it was designed to do. Kill your azz.

[bitt]

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4025642/posts?page=928#928

H/T COUNTrecount
~~~~~~

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/what-if-the-largest-experiment-on

What if the largest experiment on human beings in history is a failure?
A report from an Indiana life insurance company raises serious concerns.

Robert W Malone MD, MS
14 hr ago

[ransomnote]

In the Bloggers & Personal forum, on a thread titled The Powerful Pfizer Presentation That Got Dr. Robert Malone Kicked Off Twitter - Pfizer's own vaccine trial data shows an INCREASED risk of illness and death for the vaccinated., swingdoc wrote:

There are so many things I want to post in regards to problems with this vid.
But I’ll start with RRR vs ARR.( relative risk
reduction vs absolute risk reduction)

For sure sample:
Breast cancer 1/8 women will develop currently
Say there is an drug or screening that reduces the incidence to 1/16
That is a 50% RRR
So 12.5 women get breast CA without intervention
Whereas 6.25’get breast CA witH intervention.
Significant, right?
ARR is the math of 12.5/100 vs 6.25/100 opposed to 12.5 v 6.25 (RRR)

RRR =50%
ARR =‘6.25%
So, what’s more significant to you, a RRR of 50% or an ARR of 6.25%?

Is. By doing X we can reduce your chances of breast CA by 50%
Or by doing X we cable reduce your chances of breast CA by 6.25%

Re-read and think it through:

 When you apply a congatious illness as deadly as the seasonal flu, it quite obviously becomes a shell game.

There are football stadiums which separate the vaxxed and unvaxxed, wherein the 'vaccinated' were at best, less than one percent likely to spread the illness compared with the unvaccinated. The difference between the two groups is less than 1% for 2 months and continues to grow smaller every month until the 'vaccinated' are more likely to spread the illness.

The unvaccinated are fired, forced from schools, travel and into isolation because the "vaccinated" a fraction of 1 percent less contagious than the unvaccinated for 2 months or less, and then the fraction grows smaller until it's zero and then the "vaccinated" are finally more contagious than the unvaccinated.

In those work settings, wherein the unvaccinated are deemed unworthy of empoyment, they are actually healthier and able to attend work more than those who, as a result of 'vaccination' die, linger with vaccine injuries/illnesses (blindness, paralysis, stroke etc.) and some become permanently disabled.

Informed consent requires that the public understand that being 'vaccinated' does not reduce your chances of becoming ill by 95% in exchange for all the risks of the 'vaccine'. That's the lie they're being told. When breakthrough cases occurred, I watched a nurse chide people saying, "Now, no vaccine is perfect. There's still that 5% chance you could be ill. This of coures was a lie - that's the shell game right there. People traded risks to their health (most of which they were never told) in exchange for reducing their risk of Covid by 95%.

In reality, those same people would think twice before incurring all the long-term unknown risks, the strokes/clots/heart attacks/paralysis/neurological damage for around .8 of one percent reduction of their risks, which was always a fake theoretical benefit, and which is now showing to have increased their chances of illness instead of reducing it.

[swingdoc]

I have never been in favor of a vaccination mandate, FYI

[TigersEye]

Red herring. Kind of a lame one.

[TigersEye]

A virus causes a disease so, yes, that’s what I meant.

[Enlightened1]

What is the name of the disease?

Covid is a virus.

[TigersEye]

Is measles a disease?

[jmacusa]

I work in a hospital. Got the Pfizer jab a year ago. Still on two feet and breathing.

[jmacusa]

Measles is a virus.

[jmacusa]

Measles is a virus.

[TigersEye]

Tell it to the guy asking for definitions.