Posted on 11/26/2021 9:22:18 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
“Mercola recommended inhaling hydrogen peroxide to prevent and cure for COVID.”
That’s interesting. Mom has been doing that and I wondered where she got the idea. There might be something to it. She’s 97, goes everywhere mask-less, and does everything she wants to. No Covid.
D.D. Palm oil. Dr. Mercola is not alone.
https://www.firstforwomen.com/posts/health-news/palm-oil-linked-to-cancer-study
“A recent study published in the journal Nature wanted to understand the effects that consuming fatty acids like oleic, linoleic, and palmitic acid could have on mouth and skin cancer cells in mice. Both oleic and linoleic acid are found in omega-6 and 9 packed foods including flax seeds and olive oil. As for the palmitic acid, researchers fed the mice a short term diet rich in palm oil (a type of vegetable oil) to measure the fatty acid’s effects on cancer cells.
The study authors revealed that the diets including linoleic and oleic acid didn’t lead to a greater likelihood of developing cancer. Whereas, the palm oil diet caused mice to be at a higher risk of the disease. Researchers claim that this is due to the palmitic acid in the oil promoting metastasis, which is when cancer cells break away from the primary tumor and spread throughout the body. This led them to warn about this risk when consuming palm oil regularly. “
Similarly:
https://breastcancerconqueror.com/palmitic-acid-breast-cancer/
https://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/news/20170209/palm-oil-the-new-fat-under-fire
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22677343/
Hydrogen peroxide is a reactive chemical mainly used for bleaching, as a disinfectant, and as a general oxidizing agent. The aim of this study was to investigate subtle acute effects of inhaled hydrogen peroxide vapors. Eleven healthy volunteers were exposed to 0 (clean air), 0.5 and 2.2 ppm for 2h at rest. Symptoms related to irritation and central nervous system effects were rated with Visual Analog Scales. The ratings varied considerably but were generally low and with no significant differences between exposure conditions, although the ratings of smell (p=0.09, Friedman’s test), nasal irritation (p=0.06) and throat irritation (p=0.06) showed borderline tendencies to increase at 2.2 but not at 0 and 0.5 ppm. Nasal airway resistance increased after exposure to 2.2 ppm hydrogen peroxide (p=0.04, paired t-test) but not after 0.5 ppm. No exposure-related effects on pulmonary function, nasal swelling, breathing frequency and blinking frequency were detected. Furthermore, no clear effects were seen on markers of inflammation and coagulation (interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A, fibrinogen, factor VIII, von Willebrand factor and Clara cell protein in plasma). In conclusion, our study suggests that hydrogen peroxide is slightly irritating at 2.2 ppm, but not at 0.5 ppm.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289588/
6. Conclusions
Hydrogen peroxide is a widely used, highly accessible, and available chemical compound whose efficacy has been demonstrated on several human viruses, including coronavirus and influenza viruses [32]. It is possible that hydrogen peroxide, by diverse routes of administration and mechanisms of action, could exhibit a therapeutic and/or prophylactic effect against SARS-CoV-2.
The concentrations of H2O2 that we used for mouth rinses, for enteral administration, and for nebulized application are safe, as no serious side effects were reported in either of the three modalities of administration.
Research is needed to determine the full potential of complementary and alternative therapies such as those with hydrogen peroxide, for use in prophylaxis and treatment against COVID-19.
We strongly encourage the rapid development of randomized controlled trials to study the benefits of oral (enteral), mouth and nasal rinse, and vaporized applications of hydrogen peroxide against SARS-CoV-2, in singular use or therapeutic combinations.
Although further clinical studies are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antiseptic mouthwashes against SARS-CoV-2, the prophylactic application represents a promise for widespread uses among the general population, especially the vulnerable and highly exposed groups.
Here are Drs Mercola and Levy discussing nebulizing with dilute Hydrogen Peroxide and saline.
The Washington Post agrees with you regarding Hydrogen Peroxide.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/09/22/hydrogen-peroxide-covid-misinformation/
They love the word misinformation don’t they? It can’t be a disagreement of opinon.
Dr Andrew Weil does not like the use of something like 35% Hydrogen Peroxide.
Diluted can be used for sore throats.
https://www.drweil.com/health-wellness/health-centers/children/sore-throat/
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “D.D. Palm oil. Dr. Mercola is not alone.”
He may not be all alone but he is decidedly in the minority, a very small minority.
Totally amazing the lengths, the dangerous cures, the anti-vaxxers will go to to avoid taking the one thing, the vaccine, that will reduce the chances of illness, hospitalizations, and death. One wonders how many will needlessly die because the believed people like Mercola.
Palm oil;
"He may not be all alone but he is decidedly in the minority, a very small minority."
I am not going to run around doing a survey of doctors on this subject and I suspect you did not either before making your statement. So, this is just an "Ad Populum" argument.
At one time doctors washing hands between surgeries was a minority opinion. Trained doctors at the time ridiculed the need to wash their hands. Jennings, Pasteur, Koch, and others changed the view of medicine and of course, developed true vaccines.
Same type of argument advanced by leftist climate change: 99% of scientists believe in global warming/cooling/change! All gonna die! When surveyed a lot of the scientists denied having made those sort of statements.
The research on Palm oil is fairly recent. More doctors will accept it as more reserach is done. (Remember smoking and cancer?)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid19-hydrogen-peroxide/fact-check-inhaling-hydrogen-peroxide-is-not-a-recommended-treatment-for-covid-19-or-other-illnesses-idUSL1N2QV1OP
"This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our fact-checking work here"
Reuters agrees with you. Because we all should trust Reuters like we should trust Facebook like we should trust the Washington Post.
https://community.aafa.org/blog/danger-don-t-nebulize-hydrogen-peroxide-and-breathe-it-to-try-to-treat-or-prevent-covid-19
"Hydrogen peroxide can be toxic if ingested, inhaled, or by contact with the skin or eyes. Inhalation of household strength hydrogen peroxide (3%) can cause respiratory irritation. Exposure to household strength hydrogen. peroxide can cause mild ocular irritation. Inhalation of vapors from concentrated (higher than 10%) solutions may result in severe pulmonary irritation."
I would refer you back to the NIH article which discusses that subject, the use of DILUTE H2O2.
(Dr Mercola discusses dilute, not full strength, hydrogen peroxide. )
(I gargle with Saltwater and Baking soda. Totally Poisonous!)
The people who drink H2O2 full strength (See YouTube) are not bright, but that is not what we are talking about here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your statement:
"Totally amazing the lengths, the dangerous cures, the anti-vaxxers will go to to avoid taking the one thing, the vaccine, that will reduce the chances of illness, hospitalizations, and death. One wonders how many will needlessly die because the believed people like Mercola."
Sorry D. Duke, the Covid vaccines do NOT stop transmission, do NOT stop death.
(Ivermectin....1 documented death in 40 years of use though. Dangerous!)
https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/40-places-where-covid-shots-have
40 Places Where Covid Shots Have Failed To Stop The Spread 24 countries and 16 states where cases reached new all-time highs after vaccination roll outs.
Snip.... "Federal Prison Study Finds Vaccinated Just As Infectious As Unvaccinated: The study found that vaccinated prisoners were just as infectious as unvaccinated prisoners and there was no difference in the length of sickness between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. "During a high-transmission outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in a prison setting, we failed to find different durations of RT-PCR positivity, Ct values, or durations of viral culture positivity in fully vaccinated persons compared with persons who were not fully vaccinated." ...snip.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Death; FIFA soccer players, people who are required to take the shot to play soccer and who are dying.
Yah,Just a blog;
https://granitegrok.com/blog/2021/11/german-newspaper-prints-list-of-soccer-players-collapsing-with-cardiac-issues
Just some doctors you disagree with:
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/frontlinenews/500-increase-in-sudden-cardiac-and-unexplained-deaths-among-fifa-athletes-in-2021/
Same story from another source.
https://thewatchtowers.org/108-fifa-players-and-coaches-dead-in-last-6-months/
So, D.D. You are promoting the use of dangerous EULA vaccines by the FDA & CDC. Someone at these organizations is making money from them and suppressing use of actual treatments to allow the EULA designation.
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “I am not going to run around doing a survey of doctors on this subject and I suspect you did not either before making your statement.”
Because you know that this is a very minority opinion. I provided material from credible sources that demonstrates that this can be dangerous and ineffective.
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “Reuters agrees with you. Because we all should trust Reuters like we should trust Facebook like we should trust the Washington Post.”
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “Same story from another source.”
Interesting. You challenge the credibility of Reuters then you cite AFLD, one of whose spokespersons asserts that demons impregnate women while the sleep.
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “Sorry D. Duke, the Covid vaccines do NOT stop transmission, do NOT stop death (Ivermectin....1 documented death in 40 years of use though. Dangerous!)”
Talk about a strawman argument. There are no vaccines that stop all transmissions and stop all deaths. Ivermectin is dangerous and ineffective. There are no credible, peer reviewed studies that show ivermectin is as effective as the vaccines in stopping transmissions and deaths.
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “Snip.... “Federal Prison Study Finds Vaccinated Just As Infectious As Unvaccinated: The study found that vaccinated prisoners were just as infectious as unvaccinated prisoners and there was no difference in the length of sickness between the vaccinated and unvaccinated.”
In order for a vaccinated person to become infectious, the first have to become infected and the chances of an vaccinated person becoming infected is far less than the chances of an unvaccinated person.
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “So, D.D. You are promoting the use of dangerous EULA vaccines by the FDA & CDC. Someone at these organizations is making money from them and suppressing use of actual treatments to allow the EULA designation.”
The Pfizer vaccine is fully approved so there is no reason to ‘suppress use of actual treatments to allow the EULA designation.’
D.D. Thanks for your reply! (I think your tagline is mostly correct!)
D.D wrote
“Because you know that this is a very minority opinion. I provided material from credible sources that demonstrates that this can be dangerous and ineffective”.
As I noted your argument was an “Ad Populam” argument based on the logical fallacy that because most doctors (do not yet) believe a link between palm oil and cancer spread it must be false. (It may also be that they are not aware of it but that is a different issue.)
D.D. “Interesting. You challenge the credibility of Reuters then you cite AFLD, one of whose spokespersons asserts that demons impregnate women while the sleep.
Could be fake attribution or deliberate distortion of what someone said. This happened regularly to President Trump, didn’t it? They kept asking why he did not denounce white nationalism after he did. Something media does regularly, mis-state to confuse and mislead.
Since you offer the charge, please provide the name of the AFLD person and a link to them actually stating or saying that demons impregnate sleeping women. (Are they a good doctor in other ways??)
D.D. “Talk about a strawman argument. There are no vaccines that stop all transmissions and stop all deaths. (Thank you for conceding this point.) Ivermectin is dangerous and ineffective. There are no credible, peer reviewed studies that show ivermectin is as effective as the vaccines in stopping transmissions and deaths.”
See below. Ivermectin. Not ineffective, not dangerous, Must be used early. Widely used where Fauchi and the Drug Companies are not running things.
(Peer reviewed as noted. You can also select other covid treatments in the drop down box. nice! )
Early, Late, PrEP, PEP Covid Analysis (Preprint) (meta analysis) meta-analysis v155 Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 67 studies
Details • Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain statistically significant after exclusions. 45 studies show statistically signi..
Nov 23 Late Ozer et al., Journal of Medical Virology, doi:10.1002/jmv.27469 (Peer Reviewed) death, ↓75.0%, p=0.09 Effectiveness and Safety of Ivermectin in COVID‐19 Patients: A Prospective Study at A Safety‐Net Hospital
Details Small prospective PSM study in the USA, showing 75% lower mortality with ivermectin treatment, without reaching statistical significance, significantly shorter ventilation and ICU time, and longer hospitalization time. Authors leave the ..
Nov 17 PrEPPEP Samajdar et al., Journal of the Association of Physicians India, 69:11 (Peer Reviewed) cases, ↓79.8%, p<0.0001 Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine for Chemo-Prophylaxis of COVID-19: A Questionnaire Survey of Perception and Prescribing Practice of Physicians vis-a-vis Outcomes
Details Physician survey in India with 164 ivermectin prophylaxis, 129 HCQ prophylaxis, and 81 control patients, showing significantly lower COVID-19 cases with treatment. Details of the treatment and control groups and the definition of cases ar..
Nov 9 Late Stone et al., Research Square, doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1048271/v1 (Preprint)
Rapid increase of SpO2 on room air for 34 severe COVID-19 patients after ivermectin-based combination treatment: 55-62% normalization within 12-24 hours
Details Retrospective severe COVID-19 patients in Zimbabwe treated with ivermectin, doxycycline, and zinc. For 34 with SpO2 tracking, there was rapid improvement in SpO2, with 55% recovery towards SpO2=97 within 12 hours. For all 92 severe cases,..
Nov 3 Late Malaysia Ministry of Health (News) death, ↓69.1%, p=0.09 Kenyataan Akhbar KPK 3 November 2021 – Hasil Dapatan Kajian Keberkesanan Rawatan Ivermectin Untuk Pesakit COVID-19 Berisiko Tinggi (I-TECH Study)
Details RCT 490 hospitalized patients in Malaysia, showing no significant differences. There was only 13 deaths - 3 for ivermectin and 10 for control. Minimal details are available currently. Group sizes are not provided (241/249 are the closest ..
Oct 28 PrEPPEP Verma et al., Indian Journal of Community Health, 33:3 (Peer Reviewed) Assessing Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices towards Ivermectin Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for COVID-19 among Health Care Workers
Details Survey of 306 healthcare workers involved in the medication of COVID-19 patients in India. 71% indicated that ivermectin had a protective effect for COVID-19.
Oct 20 Review Low et al., Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2021.166294 (Review) (Peer Reviewed) review Repositioning Ivermectin for Covid-19 treatment: Molecular mechanisms of action against SARS-CoV-2 replication
Details Review of the antiviral characteristics of ivermectin and mechanisms of action. Authors note that ivermectin has proven effective for HIV-1, Adenovirus, flu, SARS-CoV, and more; due to genomic similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV, t..
Oct 19 Early Borody et al., TrialSite News (Preprint) death, ↓92.3%, p=0.03 Combination Therapy For COVID-19 Based on Ivermectin in an Australian Population
Details Retrospective 600 PCR+ outpatients in Australia treated with ivermectin, zinc, and doxycycline, showing significantly lower mortality and hospitalization with treatment. This trial uses a synthetic control group, and the preliminary repor..
Oct 15 In Vitro Segatori et al., Viruses, doi:10.3390/v13102084 (Peer Reviewed) (In Vitro) in vitro Effect of Ivermectin and Atorvastatin on Nuclear Localization of Importin Alpha and Drug Target Expression Profiling in Host Cells from Nasopharyngeal Swabs of SARS-CoV-2- Positive Patients
Details Gene expression analysis of nasopharyngeal swabs of COVID-19 positive and negative patients, and in vitro study supporting the use of ivermectin and atorvastatin for COVID-19, and the efficacy of ivermectin at clinically relevant dosages...
Oct 14 In Vitro Jitaboam et al., Research Square, doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-941811/v1 (Peer Reviewed) (In Vitro) in vitro Favipiravir and Ivermectin Showed in Vitro Synergistic Antiviral Activity against SARS-CoV-2
Details In Vitro study showing a strong synergistic effect of ivermectin and favipiravir. Combining multiple antiviral drugs with different mechanisms of action helps to minimize drug resistance and toxicity.
Oct 14 News Goodkin, M. (News) news Are Major Ivermectin Studies Designed for Failure?
News Goodkin, M. (News)
news
Are Major Ivermectin Studies Designed for Failure?
Details Discussion of flaws in ivermectin trials creating a bias towards not finding an effect.
(These are he most recent articles. More showing at link.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(05)62668-2/fulltext
Note the second paragraph.
D.D. “In order for a vaccinated person to become infectious, the first have to become infected and the chances of an vaccinated person becoming infected is far less than the chances of an unvaccinated person.”
I would agree but I do not think the vaccines are very effective or they would not be wanting multiple boosters. I would also indicate that the varients are originating in the vaccinated. (I will not raise the issue of natural immunity here!)
DD “The Pfizer vaccine is fully approved so there is no reason to ‘suppress use of actual treatments to allow the EULA designation.’”
I think are doing a bit of bait and switch here. I may respond at a later time!.
Have a good day!
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “Since you offer the charge, please provide the name of the AFLD person and a link to them actually stating or saying that demons impregnate sleeping women. (Are they a good doctor in other ways??)”
Stella Immanuel: numerous links just google her name.
As for the AFLD being good doctors: many reports that they fail to back up their claims and that they have little or no history in treating patients.
NETWORK OF RIGHT-WING HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS IS MAKING MILLIONS OFF HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE AND IVERMECTIN, HACKED DATA REVEALS
https://theintercept.com/2021/09/28/covid-telehealth-hydroxychloroquine-ivermectin-hacked/
https://time.com/6092368/americas-frontline-doctors-covid-19-misinformation/
Then there is:
One is Douglas Deibele, who claimed on Twitter in March that he’d successfully treated 500 patients on a combined regimen of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin — curious, given that Deibele is a dentist who has not practiced medicine in more than two decades, having set aside teeth in favor of acting. Look fast to see his uncredited bit parts in, for instance, Bad Samaritan. He is not the only member of the group who is no longer practicing medicine, but that didn’t stop them from advising a vulnerable public against wearing masks and maintaining social distance, among other false, potentially lethal rantings.
https://www.aafp.org/news/blogs/inthetrenches/entry/20200805itt-facts.html
Or this:
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “So, D.D. You are promoting the use of dangerous EULA vaccines by the FDA & CDC. Someone at these organizations is making money from them and suppressing use of actual treatments to allow the EULA designation.”
D.D. "The Pfizer vaccine is fully approved so there is no reason to ‘suppress use of actual treatments to allow the EULA designation.’"
To reiterate, the Pfizer vaccine is not approved, it is EULA. Comirnaty is approved. All this is is a little jiggery-pokery trying to pass one off as the other.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/judge-allen-winsor-pfizer-eua-comirnaty-vaccines-interchangeable/
"Federal Judge Rejects DOD Claim That Pfizer EUA and Comirnaty Vaccines Are ‘Interchangeable’
A federal district court judge has rejected a claim by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine being administered under Emergency Use Authorization is interchangeable with Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine, which in August was fully licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
In an order issued Nov. 12 in Doe et al. v. Austin, U.S. Federal District Judge Allen Winsor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida denied a preliminary injunction requested by 16 service members against the U.S. Military’s COVID vaccine mandate. A hearing is scheduled for Sept. 14, 2022.
However, the judge’s acknowledgment that “the DOD cannot mandate vaccines that only have an EUA” is significant for two reasons.
One reason pertains to the difference in ingredients and manufacturing process between Pfizer’s EUA vaccine and the approved Comirnaty vaccine, and the other pertains to the legal difference between a fully licensed vaccine and an EUA vaccine.
The latter reason would apply not just to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, but also to the vaccines produced by Moderna and Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), both of which are authorized only as EUA products."
D.D. OK, you provide a number of 3rd party articles from liberal publications regarding Front Line Doctors, but not an actual quote from the Doctor in question.
I have also heard others who have complained that they waited a long time for a reply. So lets set them aside.
The good thing is that the the efficacy of the drug is not dependent on prescribing doctor, so return to post 27 in which I provide Peer Reviewed Studies regarding Ivermectin.
mental problems resulting from the Shots
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4017435/posts
Ivermectin cures near death patient.
https://trialsitenews.com/near-death-patient-walks-out-of-hospital-after-ivermectin-treatment/
Good Night!
Well. Nothing to indicate a Satire site
Supreme Court of Canada Justice implicated UN and WHO in targeted murders of Barry & Honey Sherman
Why are the UN and WHO suspects in the “targeted murders” of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman? The Shermans owned Apotex which manufactured and sold Hydroxychloroquine – a cheap, effective and a less toxic metabolite of chloroquine.
“In conclusion, our results show that HCQ can efficiently inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. In combination with its anti-inflammatory function, we predict that the drug has a good potential to combat the disease. ” research paper Hydroxychloroquine, a less toxic derivative of chloroquine, is effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro, published March 18, 2020 – day Justin Trudeau announced the closure of Canada’s borders to most travelers during news conference outside Rideau Cottage about the measures Canada is taking to combatCOVID-19
“chloroquine is an effective pre & post-infection antiviral agent for SARS-CoV. A dose-dependant decrease in virus antigen-positive cells was observed starting at 0.1 μM chloroquine & 10 μM (Micrometre, also called micron, metric unit of measure for length equal to 0.001 mm, or about 0.000039 inch) completely abolished SARS-CoV infection. … Chloroquine, a relatively safe, effective and cheap drug used for treating many human diseases including malaria, amoebiosis and human immunodeficiency virus” Virology Journal 2005 study “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread“. Acknowledgements “This work was supported by a Canadian PENCE grant (T3), CIHR (Canadian Institutes of Health Research, is Canada’s federal funding agency for health research) group grant #MGC 64518, and CIHR grant #MGP-44363 (to NGS)” Virology Journal, Published 2005 Aug 22
“There is sufficient pre-clinical rationale and evidence regarding the effectiveness of chloroquine for treatment of COVID-19 as well as evidence of safety from long-time use in clinical practice for other indications.” Europe PMC paper ” A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of chloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19“.
Well. something to watch. How many died because this apparently effective treatment was denied to them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.