Posted on 11/26/2021 9:22:18 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
I want to share a very personal story and confession with you. When I was in medical school in the late ‘70s, I was on the front cover for the national medical student handbook. I’m sharing this photo with you that shows me administering a vaccine. At that time and for the next 15 years, I rigidly followed all vaccine guidelines.
Even when I started seeing patients at my own clinic, I never once questioned the safety of any vaccine and I rejected information from people voicing their concerns. In the late ‘80s, one particularly kind patient of mine, a mother, patiently shared a personal testimony about her vaccine-injured son, Jack.
She opened my eyes to a reality that I was previously unaware of and did not want to accept. She confronted me with clinical data that I could no longer ignore. In the years that followed, I saw more and more parents who had serious fears about certain vaccines; I slowly came to the realization that informed consent was practically nonexistent and there were serious medical risks being covered up by pharmaceutical companies and the federal government.
We are now in the midst of vaccine mandates that have affected nearly every person on the planet. If you don’t know someone personally who has suffered a reaction to these vaccines, you are likely in the minority.
Sheryl Ruettgers, who is the wife of former Green Bay Packers offensive lineman Ken Ruettgers, is among those who have suffered severe adverse effects from a COVID-19 injection.
Four days after receiving the first dose of the Moderna COVID-19 shot in January 2021, Sheryl experienced a severe neurological reaction. She is still experiencing muscle pain, numbness, weakness and paresthesia that inhibit her daily activities.1 When she connected on social media with others who had been injured by the injections, the private pages were shut down.
After connecting with doctors, nurses and other individuals who had experienced firsthand accounts of adverse reactions, the group wrote a letter to Dr. Janet Woodcock, acting commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It stated:2
“We deserve and strongly request transparency and acknowledgment of these vaccine reactions so that there can be a beginning to the discoveries and developments in the care that we desperately need. Until acknowledgement of these adverse reactions exists, it will be impossible for people to receive care.
We are pleading that you make the medical community aware of these reactions so we can get the medical care that we need and hopefully recover and return to our previously healthy lives.”
The group received no response from federal officials, which led Ken to start the website C19 Vax Reactions,3 for people to share their stories. There you can read over 500 real testimonies of adverse reactions to the shots and view dozens of videos detailing individuals’ reactions.
In one example, 17-year-old Everest Romney received his first dose of the Pfizer shot, and experienced extreme swelling in his arm and neck that night.4 Two days later, the previously healthy athlete was unable to lift his head due to the pain and swelling. A pediatrician dismissed the concerns, blaming them on a sports injury.
His mother insisted on a CT scan, which revealed a blood clot inside his jugular vein on the same side he got the shot. Rare blood clots in his brain were also later revealed. He ended up in the ICU, where doctors still refused to acknowledge that the clots could be linked to the shot.
Medical observations from doctors, nurses, first responders, general practitioners and other medical professionals regarding negative vaccine reactions are also included at C19 Vax Reactions. For example, Karen W. stated:5
“I work in andrology in a fertility clinic. The rumors about the increase in miscarriages is not a rumor. It’s real. We are seeing it, and it started when the shots rolled out to the general public, in March/April.”
Another medical professional, Dr. Katherine R., said:6
“I have seen pulmonary emboli, DVTs, psoriasis exacerbations/ diffuse rashes, peripheral neuropathy, and CVAs from the shots. I purposefully look to see when the patient has received their shots. None of my colleagues care to look or ask. It is a nonissue for them. A potential reaction after vaccine is likely to be a coincidence, I’m told.”
Y.D., another doctor, similarly stated:7
“I’ve seen 2 instances of previously localized cancers turn metastatic within a month of the second dose. I’ve seen 1 instance of polyarticular arthritis in an otherwise healthy mid 30’s male. 1 instance of disseminated mucosal vasculitis in a 20 something female. 1 death from a rhinovirus infection after vaccination.”
This is the type of data that need to be collected, analyzed and studied in the midst of this unprecedented injection campaign, but instead those who speak out are silenced or discredited. Kyle Warner, a 29-year-old professional mountain bike racer, developed pericarditis, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and reactive arthritis following his second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot.8
An ER doctor refused to believe it was an adverse reaction to the jab and instead blamed it on a “psychotic episode.” At the Real, Not Rare rally held in Washington, D.C., Warner spoke before politicians to make a difference in the support level for vaccine-injured people — which is nonexistent in the U.S. — and voice opposition to vaccine mandates.
Their mission is to gain acknowledgement from elected officials and federal health agencies of vaccine adverse reactions and raise awareness within the medical community about these reactions. The Real, Not Rare website has also collected dozens of stories from people who have been injured by COVID-19 shots.9 They also want to stop the denial of certain vaccine exemptions and stop vaccine mandates:10
“Real lives are being affected by ‘not so rare’ consequences. Many vaccine injured individuals are seeking acknowledgment by the media and government so they can receive better healthcare and treatment. Vaccine injured individuals did their part by getting this vaccine, and now they need your help.”
In a second letter to the CDC and FDA, dated September 4, 2021, the “ever-growing group of Americans who have suffered severe and ongoing neurological adverse reactions” to the COVID-19 shots, asked for acknowledgement that these reactions exist. “Until you acknowledge us, we simply do not exist,” they wrote, adding:11
“Doctors tell us repeatedly that if neurological reactions were occurring, the medical community would be promptly notified by the CDC and FDA … The experts at the NIH have stated that they believe these reactions are treatable and that early intervention is key to reducing the severity and duration of these disabling reactions.
Given that these adverse reactions are being denied recognition, it is impossible for those who are injured to receive any early intervention and, therefore people remain hopelessly injured.”
While health officials remain silent about COVID-19 injection reactions, the growing number of reports cannot be silenced forever. Board-certified internist and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough12 detailed the nonfatal syndromes that are occurring after COVID-19 shots, which cause symptoms similar to that of long COVID in many cases. The shot-induced syndromes fall into four areas, the first being cardiac.
In addition to myocarditis, a recognized adverse reaction to the shots, atrial fibrillation in young people and pericarditis can also occur post-COVID-19 shot. The second category of shot-induced syndromes is neurologic, which causes neurological symptoms similar to those among COVID-19 long haulers, as well as additional, more serious, effects. This includes Guillain-Barré syndrome, which can be fatal, bell’s palsy, seizures, persistent headaches and blood clots in the brain.
The third category is immunologic, which includes suppression of lymphocyte count and reactivation of other viral syndromes, including Epstein-Barr virus and shingles. The fourth category — hematologic — occurs about two weeks after the shot and describes vaccine-induced thrombocytopenic purpura.
Signs include bruising all over the body, bleeding from the gums and nose and dark urine. If you notice these signs in the weeks after receiving a COVID-19 injection, get to a hospital immediately.
For those suffering from these shot-induced syndromes, the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Working Group’s I-RECOVER13 protocol for long-haul COVID syndrome has been used to treat shot-induced symptoms with similar success. The protocol can be downloaded in full,14 giving you step-by-step instructions on how to treat reactions from COVID-19 injections.
I am dedicated now more than ever to individuals and families who have been injured by these vaccines. They were not informed of the risks. They believed what they were told — that the vaccines were safe and effective. These people’s lives have been changed forever. They have been isolated, unsupported and shamed; wading through grief in the wake of vaccine mandates established “for the greater good.”
The more devoted I became in supporting the ethical principal of informed consent to medical risk taking — which includes the legal right to make voluntary decisions about getting an experimental injection — the more the attacks from the media, the government and pharmaceutical companies were compounded.
People recognize truth when they see and hear it. We are united in our philosophical opposition to government health officials intimidating, threatening and coercing citizens to violate their conscientiously-held beliefs. Censorship is pervasive; big tech has colluded with dictators and pharmaceutical companies to bury the harms occurring through these experimental vaccines, including death.
If you want your voice to be heard, I will help you share your testimony. Vaccine mandates have led to injuries, devastation and deaths — while the brainwashing “get your vaccine now” campaign is being used to divide and conquer.
One parent’s personal grief shared with me nearly 30 years ago changed my life and opened my eyes. One spark is all that is required to start a fire. There is a revolution building — a revolution for freedom to live your life without medical mandates or dictators calling the shots.
Please share your story with us, and encourage others you know who have a story to share theirs. It’s never been more important than now, for you and your family, to take control of your health.
“Mercola recommended inhaling hydrogen peroxide to prevent and cure for COVID.”
That’s interesting. Mom has been doing that and I wondered where she got the idea. There might be something to it. She’s 97, goes everywhere mask-less, and does everything she wants to. No Covid.
D.D. Palm oil. Dr. Mercola is not alone.
https://www.firstforwomen.com/posts/health-news/palm-oil-linked-to-cancer-study
“A recent study published in the journal Nature wanted to understand the effects that consuming fatty acids like oleic, linoleic, and palmitic acid could have on mouth and skin cancer cells in mice. Both oleic and linoleic acid are found in omega-6 and 9 packed foods including flax seeds and olive oil. As for the palmitic acid, researchers fed the mice a short term diet rich in palm oil (a type of vegetable oil) to measure the fatty acid’s effects on cancer cells.
The study authors revealed that the diets including linoleic and oleic acid didn’t lead to a greater likelihood of developing cancer. Whereas, the palm oil diet caused mice to be at a higher risk of the disease. Researchers claim that this is due to the palmitic acid in the oil promoting metastasis, which is when cancer cells break away from the primary tumor and spread throughout the body. This led them to warn about this risk when consuming palm oil regularly. “
Similarly:
https://breastcancerconqueror.com/palmitic-acid-breast-cancer/
https://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/news/20170209/palm-oil-the-new-fat-under-fire
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22677343/
Hydrogen peroxide is a reactive chemical mainly used for bleaching, as a disinfectant, and as a general oxidizing agent. The aim of this study was to investigate subtle acute effects of inhaled hydrogen peroxide vapors. Eleven healthy volunteers were exposed to 0 (clean air), 0.5 and 2.2 ppm for 2h at rest. Symptoms related to irritation and central nervous system effects were rated with Visual Analog Scales. The ratings varied considerably but were generally low and with no significant differences between exposure conditions, although the ratings of smell (p=0.09, Friedman’s test), nasal irritation (p=0.06) and throat irritation (p=0.06) showed borderline tendencies to increase at 2.2 but not at 0 and 0.5 ppm. Nasal airway resistance increased after exposure to 2.2 ppm hydrogen peroxide (p=0.04, paired t-test) but not after 0.5 ppm. No exposure-related effects on pulmonary function, nasal swelling, breathing frequency and blinking frequency were detected. Furthermore, no clear effects were seen on markers of inflammation and coagulation (interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A, fibrinogen, factor VIII, von Willebrand factor and Clara cell protein in plasma). In conclusion, our study suggests that hydrogen peroxide is slightly irritating at 2.2 ppm, but not at 0.5 ppm.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289588/
6. Conclusions
Hydrogen peroxide is a widely used, highly accessible, and available chemical compound whose efficacy has been demonstrated on several human viruses, including coronavirus and influenza viruses [32]. It is possible that hydrogen peroxide, by diverse routes of administration and mechanisms of action, could exhibit a therapeutic and/or prophylactic effect against SARS-CoV-2.
The concentrations of H2O2 that we used for mouth rinses, for enteral administration, and for nebulized application are safe, as no serious side effects were reported in either of the three modalities of administration.
Research is needed to determine the full potential of complementary and alternative therapies such as those with hydrogen peroxide, for use in prophylaxis and treatment against COVID-19.
We strongly encourage the rapid development of randomized controlled trials to study the benefits of oral (enteral), mouth and nasal rinse, and vaporized applications of hydrogen peroxide against SARS-CoV-2, in singular use or therapeutic combinations.
Although further clinical studies are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antiseptic mouthwashes against SARS-CoV-2, the prophylactic application represents a promise for widespread uses among the general population, especially the vulnerable and highly exposed groups.
Here are Drs Mercola and Levy discussing nebulizing with dilute Hydrogen Peroxide and saline.
The Washington Post agrees with you regarding Hydrogen Peroxide.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/09/22/hydrogen-peroxide-covid-misinformation/
They love the word misinformation don’t they? It can’t be a disagreement of opinon.
Dr Andrew Weil does not like the use of something like 35% Hydrogen Peroxide.
Diluted can be used for sore throats.
https://www.drweil.com/health-wellness/health-centers/children/sore-throat/
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “D.D. Palm oil. Dr. Mercola is not alone.”
He may not be all alone but he is decidedly in the minority, a very small minority.
Totally amazing the lengths, the dangerous cures, the anti-vaxxers will go to to avoid taking the one thing, the vaccine, that will reduce the chances of illness, hospitalizations, and death. One wonders how many will needlessly die because the believed people like Mercola.
Palm oil;
"He may not be all alone but he is decidedly in the minority, a very small minority."
I am not going to run around doing a survey of doctors on this subject and I suspect you did not either before making your statement. So, this is just an "Ad Populum" argument.
At one time doctors washing hands between surgeries was a minority opinion. Trained doctors at the time ridiculed the need to wash their hands. Jennings, Pasteur, Koch, and others changed the view of medicine and of course, developed true vaccines.
Same type of argument advanced by leftist climate change: 99% of scientists believe in global warming/cooling/change! All gonna die! When surveyed a lot of the scientists denied having made those sort of statements.
The research on Palm oil is fairly recent. More doctors will accept it as more reserach is done. (Remember smoking and cancer?)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid19-hydrogen-peroxide/fact-check-inhaling-hydrogen-peroxide-is-not-a-recommended-treatment-for-covid-19-or-other-illnesses-idUSL1N2QV1OP
"This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our fact-checking work here"
Reuters agrees with you. Because we all should trust Reuters like we should trust Facebook like we should trust the Washington Post.
https://community.aafa.org/blog/danger-don-t-nebulize-hydrogen-peroxide-and-breathe-it-to-try-to-treat-or-prevent-covid-19
"Hydrogen peroxide can be toxic if ingested, inhaled, or by contact with the skin or eyes. Inhalation of household strength hydrogen peroxide (3%) can cause respiratory irritation. Exposure to household strength hydrogen. peroxide can cause mild ocular irritation. Inhalation of vapors from concentrated (higher than 10%) solutions may result in severe pulmonary irritation."
I would refer you back to the NIH article which discusses that subject, the use of DILUTE H2O2.
(Dr Mercola discusses dilute, not full strength, hydrogen peroxide. )
(I gargle with Saltwater and Baking soda. Totally Poisonous!)
The people who drink H2O2 full strength (See YouTube) are not bright, but that is not what we are talking about here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your statement:
"Totally amazing the lengths, the dangerous cures, the anti-vaxxers will go to to avoid taking the one thing, the vaccine, that will reduce the chances of illness, hospitalizations, and death. One wonders how many will needlessly die because the believed people like Mercola."
Sorry D. Duke, the Covid vaccines do NOT stop transmission, do NOT stop death.
(Ivermectin....1 documented death in 40 years of use though. Dangerous!)
https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/40-places-where-covid-shots-have
40 Places Where Covid Shots Have Failed To Stop The Spread 24 countries and 16 states where cases reached new all-time highs after vaccination roll outs.
Snip.... "Federal Prison Study Finds Vaccinated Just As Infectious As Unvaccinated: The study found that vaccinated prisoners were just as infectious as unvaccinated prisoners and there was no difference in the length of sickness between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. "During a high-transmission outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in a prison setting, we failed to find different durations of RT-PCR positivity, Ct values, or durations of viral culture positivity in fully vaccinated persons compared with persons who were not fully vaccinated." ...snip.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Death; FIFA soccer players, people who are required to take the shot to play soccer and who are dying.
Yah,Just a blog;
https://granitegrok.com/blog/2021/11/german-newspaper-prints-list-of-soccer-players-collapsing-with-cardiac-issues
Just some doctors you disagree with:
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/frontlinenews/500-increase-in-sudden-cardiac-and-unexplained-deaths-among-fifa-athletes-in-2021/
Same story from another source.
https://thewatchtowers.org/108-fifa-players-and-coaches-dead-in-last-6-months/
So, D.D. You are promoting the use of dangerous EULA vaccines by the FDA & CDC. Someone at these organizations is making money from them and suppressing use of actual treatments to allow the EULA designation.
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “I am not going to run around doing a survey of doctors on this subject and I suspect you did not either before making your statement.”
Because you know that this is a very minority opinion. I provided material from credible sources that demonstrates that this can be dangerous and ineffective.
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “Reuters agrees with you. Because we all should trust Reuters like we should trust Facebook like we should trust the Washington Post.”
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “Same story from another source.”
Interesting. You challenge the credibility of Reuters then you cite AFLD, one of whose spokespersons asserts that demons impregnate women while the sleep.
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “Sorry D. Duke, the Covid vaccines do NOT stop transmission, do NOT stop death (Ivermectin....1 documented death in 40 years of use though. Dangerous!)”
Talk about a strawman argument. There are no vaccines that stop all transmissions and stop all deaths. Ivermectin is dangerous and ineffective. There are no credible, peer reviewed studies that show ivermectin is as effective as the vaccines in stopping transmissions and deaths.
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “Snip.... “Federal Prison Study Finds Vaccinated Just As Infectious As Unvaccinated: The study found that vaccinated prisoners were just as infectious as unvaccinated prisoners and there was no difference in the length of sickness between the vaccinated and unvaccinated.”
In order for a vaccinated person to become infectious, the first have to become infected and the chances of an vaccinated person becoming infected is far less than the chances of an unvaccinated person.
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “So, D.D. You are promoting the use of dangerous EULA vaccines by the FDA & CDC. Someone at these organizations is making money from them and suppressing use of actual treatments to allow the EULA designation.”
The Pfizer vaccine is fully approved so there is no reason to ‘suppress use of actual treatments to allow the EULA designation.’
D.D. Thanks for your reply! (I think your tagline is mostly correct!)
D.D wrote
“Because you know that this is a very minority opinion. I provided material from credible sources that demonstrates that this can be dangerous and ineffective”.
As I noted your argument was an “Ad Populam” argument based on the logical fallacy that because most doctors (do not yet) believe a link between palm oil and cancer spread it must be false. (It may also be that they are not aware of it but that is a different issue.)
D.D. “Interesting. You challenge the credibility of Reuters then you cite AFLD, one of whose spokespersons asserts that demons impregnate women while the sleep.
Could be fake attribution or deliberate distortion of what someone said. This happened regularly to President Trump, didn’t it? They kept asking why he did not denounce white nationalism after he did. Something media does regularly, mis-state to confuse and mislead.
Since you offer the charge, please provide the name of the AFLD person and a link to them actually stating or saying that demons impregnate sleeping women. (Are they a good doctor in other ways??)
D.D. “Talk about a strawman argument. There are no vaccines that stop all transmissions and stop all deaths. (Thank you for conceding this point.) Ivermectin is dangerous and ineffective. There are no credible, peer reviewed studies that show ivermectin is as effective as the vaccines in stopping transmissions and deaths.”
See below. Ivermectin. Not ineffective, not dangerous, Must be used early. Widely used where Fauchi and the Drug Companies are not running things.
(Peer reviewed as noted. You can also select other covid treatments in the drop down box. nice! )
Early, Late, PrEP, PEP Covid Analysis (Preprint) (meta analysis) meta-analysis v155 Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 67 studies
Details • Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain statistically significant after exclusions. 45 studies show statistically signi..
Nov 23 Late Ozer et al., Journal of Medical Virology, doi:10.1002/jmv.27469 (Peer Reviewed) death, ↓75.0%, p=0.09 Effectiveness and Safety of Ivermectin in COVID‐19 Patients: A Prospective Study at A Safety‐Net Hospital
Details Small prospective PSM study in the USA, showing 75% lower mortality with ivermectin treatment, without reaching statistical significance, significantly shorter ventilation and ICU time, and longer hospitalization time. Authors leave the ..
Nov 17 PrEPPEP Samajdar et al., Journal of the Association of Physicians India, 69:11 (Peer Reviewed) cases, ↓79.8%, p<0.0001 Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine for Chemo-Prophylaxis of COVID-19: A Questionnaire Survey of Perception and Prescribing Practice of Physicians vis-a-vis Outcomes
Details Physician survey in India with 164 ivermectin prophylaxis, 129 HCQ prophylaxis, and 81 control patients, showing significantly lower COVID-19 cases with treatment. Details of the treatment and control groups and the definition of cases ar..
Nov 9 Late Stone et al., Research Square, doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1048271/v1 (Preprint)
Rapid increase of SpO2 on room air for 34 severe COVID-19 patients after ivermectin-based combination treatment: 55-62% normalization within 12-24 hours
Details Retrospective severe COVID-19 patients in Zimbabwe treated with ivermectin, doxycycline, and zinc. For 34 with SpO2 tracking, there was rapid improvement in SpO2, with 55% recovery towards SpO2=97 within 12 hours. For all 92 severe cases,..
Nov 3 Late Malaysia Ministry of Health (News) death, ↓69.1%, p=0.09 Kenyataan Akhbar KPK 3 November 2021 – Hasil Dapatan Kajian Keberkesanan Rawatan Ivermectin Untuk Pesakit COVID-19 Berisiko Tinggi (I-TECH Study)
Details RCT 490 hospitalized patients in Malaysia, showing no significant differences. There was only 13 deaths - 3 for ivermectin and 10 for control. Minimal details are available currently. Group sizes are not provided (241/249 are the closest ..
Oct 28 PrEPPEP Verma et al., Indian Journal of Community Health, 33:3 (Peer Reviewed) Assessing Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices towards Ivermectin Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for COVID-19 among Health Care Workers
Details Survey of 306 healthcare workers involved in the medication of COVID-19 patients in India. 71% indicated that ivermectin had a protective effect for COVID-19.
Oct 20 Review Low et al., Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2021.166294 (Review) (Peer Reviewed) review Repositioning Ivermectin for Covid-19 treatment: Molecular mechanisms of action against SARS-CoV-2 replication
Details Review of the antiviral characteristics of ivermectin and mechanisms of action. Authors note that ivermectin has proven effective for HIV-1, Adenovirus, flu, SARS-CoV, and more; due to genomic similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV, t..
Oct 19 Early Borody et al., TrialSite News (Preprint) death, ↓92.3%, p=0.03 Combination Therapy For COVID-19 Based on Ivermectin in an Australian Population
Details Retrospective 600 PCR+ outpatients in Australia treated with ivermectin, zinc, and doxycycline, showing significantly lower mortality and hospitalization with treatment. This trial uses a synthetic control group, and the preliminary repor..
Oct 15 In Vitro Segatori et al., Viruses, doi:10.3390/v13102084 (Peer Reviewed) (In Vitro) in vitro Effect of Ivermectin and Atorvastatin on Nuclear Localization of Importin Alpha and Drug Target Expression Profiling in Host Cells from Nasopharyngeal Swabs of SARS-CoV-2- Positive Patients
Details Gene expression analysis of nasopharyngeal swabs of COVID-19 positive and negative patients, and in vitro study supporting the use of ivermectin and atorvastatin for COVID-19, and the efficacy of ivermectin at clinically relevant dosages...
Oct 14 In Vitro Jitaboam et al., Research Square, doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-941811/v1 (Peer Reviewed) (In Vitro) in vitro Favipiravir and Ivermectin Showed in Vitro Synergistic Antiviral Activity against SARS-CoV-2
Details In Vitro study showing a strong synergistic effect of ivermectin and favipiravir. Combining multiple antiviral drugs with different mechanisms of action helps to minimize drug resistance and toxicity.
Oct 14 News Goodkin, M. (News) news Are Major Ivermectin Studies Designed for Failure?
News Goodkin, M. (News)
news
Are Major Ivermectin Studies Designed for Failure?
Details Discussion of flaws in ivermectin trials creating a bias towards not finding an effect.
(These are he most recent articles. More showing at link.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(05)62668-2/fulltext
Note the second paragraph.
D.D. “In order for a vaccinated person to become infectious, the first have to become infected and the chances of an vaccinated person becoming infected is far less than the chances of an unvaccinated person.”
I would agree but I do not think the vaccines are very effective or they would not be wanting multiple boosters. I would also indicate that the varients are originating in the vaccinated. (I will not raise the issue of natural immunity here!)
DD “The Pfizer vaccine is fully approved so there is no reason to ‘suppress use of actual treatments to allow the EULA designation.’”
I think are doing a bit of bait and switch here. I may respond at a later time!.
Have a good day!
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “Since you offer the charge, please provide the name of the AFLD person and a link to them actually stating or saying that demons impregnate sleeping women. (Are they a good doctor in other ways??)”
Stella Immanuel: numerous links just google her name.
As for the AFLD being good doctors: many reports that they fail to back up their claims and that they have little or no history in treating patients.
NETWORK OF RIGHT-WING HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS IS MAKING MILLIONS OFF HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE AND IVERMECTIN, HACKED DATA REVEALS
https://theintercept.com/2021/09/28/covid-telehealth-hydroxychloroquine-ivermectin-hacked/
https://time.com/6092368/americas-frontline-doctors-covid-19-misinformation/
Then there is:
One is Douglas Deibele, who claimed on Twitter in March that he’d successfully treated 500 patients on a combined regimen of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin — curious, given that Deibele is a dentist who has not practiced medicine in more than two decades, having set aside teeth in favor of acting. Look fast to see his uncredited bit parts in, for instance, Bad Samaritan. He is not the only member of the group who is no longer practicing medicine, but that didn’t stop them from advising a vulnerable public against wearing masks and maintaining social distance, among other false, potentially lethal rantings.
https://www.aafp.org/news/blogs/inthetrenches/entry/20200805itt-facts.html
Or this:
Pete from Shawnee Mission wrote: “So, D.D. You are promoting the use of dangerous EULA vaccines by the FDA & CDC. Someone at these organizations is making money from them and suppressing use of actual treatments to allow the EULA designation.”
D.D. "The Pfizer vaccine is fully approved so there is no reason to ‘suppress use of actual treatments to allow the EULA designation.’"
To reiterate, the Pfizer vaccine is not approved, it is EULA. Comirnaty is approved. All this is is a little jiggery-pokery trying to pass one off as the other.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/judge-allen-winsor-pfizer-eua-comirnaty-vaccines-interchangeable/
"Federal Judge Rejects DOD Claim That Pfizer EUA and Comirnaty Vaccines Are ‘Interchangeable’
A federal district court judge has rejected a claim by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine being administered under Emergency Use Authorization is interchangeable with Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine, which in August was fully licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
In an order issued Nov. 12 in Doe et al. v. Austin, U.S. Federal District Judge Allen Winsor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida denied a preliminary injunction requested by 16 service members against the U.S. Military’s COVID vaccine mandate. A hearing is scheduled for Sept. 14, 2022.
However, the judge’s acknowledgment that “the DOD cannot mandate vaccines that only have an EUA” is significant for two reasons.
One reason pertains to the difference in ingredients and manufacturing process between Pfizer’s EUA vaccine and the approved Comirnaty vaccine, and the other pertains to the legal difference between a fully licensed vaccine and an EUA vaccine.
The latter reason would apply not just to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, but also to the vaccines produced by Moderna and Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), both of which are authorized only as EUA products."
D.D. OK, you provide a number of 3rd party articles from liberal publications regarding Front Line Doctors, but not an actual quote from the Doctor in question.
I have also heard others who have complained that they waited a long time for a reply. So lets set them aside.
The good thing is that the the efficacy of the drug is not dependent on prescribing doctor, so return to post 27 in which I provide Peer Reviewed Studies regarding Ivermectin.
mental problems resulting from the Shots
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4017435/posts
Ivermectin cures near death patient.
https://trialsitenews.com/near-death-patient-walks-out-of-hospital-after-ivermectin-treatment/
Good Night!
Well. Nothing to indicate a Satire site
Supreme Court of Canada Justice implicated UN and WHO in targeted murders of Barry & Honey Sherman
Why are the UN and WHO suspects in the “targeted murders” of Justin Trudeau’s August 26, 2015 election campaign fundraisers Barry and Honey Sherman? The Shermans owned Apotex which manufactured and sold Hydroxychloroquine – a cheap, effective and a less toxic metabolite of chloroquine.
“In conclusion, our results show that HCQ can efficiently inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. In combination with its anti-inflammatory function, we predict that the drug has a good potential to combat the disease. ” research paper Hydroxychloroquine, a less toxic derivative of chloroquine, is effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro, published March 18, 2020 – day Justin Trudeau announced the closure of Canada’s borders to most travelers during news conference outside Rideau Cottage about the measures Canada is taking to combatCOVID-19
“chloroquine is an effective pre & post-infection antiviral agent for SARS-CoV. A dose-dependant decrease in virus antigen-positive cells was observed starting at 0.1 μM chloroquine & 10 μM (Micrometre, also called micron, metric unit of measure for length equal to 0.001 mm, or about 0.000039 inch) completely abolished SARS-CoV infection. … Chloroquine, a relatively safe, effective and cheap drug used for treating many human diseases including malaria, amoebiosis and human immunodeficiency virus” Virology Journal 2005 study “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread“. Acknowledgements “This work was supported by a Canadian PENCE grant (T3), CIHR (Canadian Institutes of Health Research, is Canada’s federal funding agency for health research) group grant #MGC 64518, and CIHR grant #MGP-44363 (to NGS)” Virology Journal, Published 2005 Aug 22
“There is sufficient pre-clinical rationale and evidence regarding the effectiveness of chloroquine for treatment of COVID-19 as well as evidence of safety from long-time use in clinical practice for other indications.” Europe PMC paper ” A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of chloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19“.
Well. something to watch. How many died because this apparently effective treatment was denied to them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.