Posted on 08/07/2021 2:36:23 PM PDT by DFG
For months, we’ve been warning people that Covid-19 “vaccine” totalitarianism would eventually lead to government taking our kids if we don’t let them get the jab. Well, it’s happening.
Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the very mRNA technology used in Pfizer and Moderna injections, was on with Steve Bannon on War Room today to explain the situation that’s unfolding in Boston, MA. A 14-year-old child who wants to be vaccinated could not get her parents’ permission, so the court has stepped in and revoked custody in order for her to get vaccinated without their consent.
“So, I’ve been called to testify as an expert witness in a court in Boston. The child who has been removed from their parents’ custody, a 14-year-old,” Malone said. “And the legal system is insisting on vaccinating this 14-year-old.
Not that it should matter, but the parents are not uninformed nincompoops. The mother is a high-level executive at a Biotech firm.
“The mother is objecting, and she’s a very senior Biotech executive,” Malone continued. “She’s highly informed. She’s made the decision not to vaccinate her child based upon the data. The courts have removed custody and are trying to force the child to accept vaccination. They’re so worked up, the parents have the capital, they’re going to fly me up to Boston to testify in court.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thelibertydaily.com ...
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3970456/posts
This is the article we were talking about. The one that contradicted the earlier report that children should not be vaccinated.
Very likely. So she can be part of the In Crowd.
If this is the first of this type of act, I am overjoyed and saddened.
If this is like it is reading, the government is taking a minor child away from parents custody and by doing so is causing possible harm to the child.
There are common side effects to these injections.
“The most commonly reported side effects, which typically lasted several days, were pain at the injection site, tiredness, headache, muscle pain, chills, joint pain, swollen lymph nodes in the same arm as the injection, nausea and vomiting, and fever. Of note, more people experienced these side effects after the second dose than after the first dose, so it is important for vaccination providers and recipients to expect that there may be some side effects after either dose, but even more so after the second dose.”
Taking a child from parents and creating a possible physical threat to the child is called child abuse and borders on the line of kidnapping and slavery. If that kid gets hurt in any way, the parents should sue them for more than can be imagined. And by doing so will set a precedence that will take the wind out of the sails of this type of action and cause government to back off the population. And it should be written down anywhere people can read it. All they have to do is have legal representation with the child at injection and follow up. If the child has pain, the government is toast.
wy69
Nephilim Invasion. Here now.
Transhumanism to disintegration. Blood invasion Prince and power of the air
“creating a possible physical threat to the child is called child abuse and borders on the line of kidnapping and slavery. If that kid gets hurt in any way, the “
Nephilim Invasion. Child sacrifice. Canabilism. Raphilim practice Philistine. Og.
If a judge did that to me, he would not be a judge for very long.
Plenty of Vaxxers are giggling and rubbing their hands together
“ THANKS VAX SHILLS.”
******************************
Do you know the IMAGINARY NAME of this IMAGINARY GIRL in this IMAGINARY CASE? And what IMAGINARY COURT is this IMAGINARY CASE being held in?
Hanging judges has dual definitions.
MASS PSYCHOSIS - How an Entire Population Becomes MENTALLY ILL
This explains the Covid Terrified Sheeple. I highly recommend all the masked and gloved Sheeple, who are terrified of catching the virus, try combat to see what real terror is like.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09maaUaRT4M
We Were Soldiers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuaSi-H0oGY&t=10s
Do you have children? She’s 14, which means she has the wisdom, knowledge, and judgement of a turnip. Frustrating? Of course. But she’s a CHILD. The judge, here, is the bad guy, not the child. She’s just being immature, which is what kids are. In fact, it’s NORMAL for them to be so, with rare exception.
We shall probably never know since family court cases are not available, unlike civil and criminal cases.
Fine.
Take custody. Just don’t try to give her back.
The court took her, the court can clothe her, feed her, house her, pay her medical bills, and educate her.
Don’t even think the court is off of the hook just because she got some shots.
What has changed to suddenly make the parents responsible and competent enough to resume their parental duties?
Social media and peer pressure is now many times more important to many adults, and most teens, than many to nearly all family relationships.
Social media groups are now becoming much more influential in breaking up marriages as well.
Satan and government/state marxist totalitarians love this.
A 14yr old girl stood in front of a judge and stated she wanted to be vaccinated against her parents wishes.
Some would say no if they were the judge.
Some would say yes.
Bingo. Use of the term, "revoke custody" seems relevant in this regard.
Otherwise, the court's authority to remove a child is almost certainly based on state statutes, so an early question would be whether the state has made vaccinations mandatory for all of its employees, contractors and elected officials.
Bingo. Use of the term, "revoke custody" seems relevant in this regard.
Otherwise, the court's authority to remove a child is almost certainly based on state statutes, so an early question would be whether the state has made vaccinations mandatory for all of its employees, contractors and elected officials.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
